There must be a name for that fallacy: Read the same books that I do and you'll agree with me.
Why does the government hide UFO's?
- Thread starter darksidZz
- Start date
Magical Realist
Valued Senior Member
Or, educate yourself on a topic by reading up on it so you can credibly talk about that topic.
That's a different fallacy: People who disagree with me are uneducated.
My reading suggests that
1. Aliens are telepathic
2. They have achieved interstellar travel
3. Their ships use 100% of the energy, nothing is lost
4. They have spread out to our planet rather than traveling to it purposefully (initially)
5. David Jacobs may be unreliable as the Emma Woods fiasco shows
6. Insectoids are the true aliens with the greys being some kind of hybrid attempts
Concerns are I've deduced only telepathic species can achieve interstellar travel because of the resources and knowledge pool required, it would need a cohesive society with no deviations from one part of the planet to another. They would need to work together for such an achievement. So naturally it makes sense these visitors are telepathic.
Also a plan of colonization would only make sense if you were bioforming your species, that would leave the environment intact and all the resources instead of terraforming which would destroy or alter them. Infact terraforming as we think of it may be impossible on a planetary scale. The idea they are attempting this is supportive they are real as it makes sense and falls in line with a reason.
Just a few thoughts
1. Aliens are telepathic
2. They have achieved interstellar travel
3. Their ships use 100% of the energy, nothing is lost
4. They have spread out to our planet rather than traveling to it purposefully (initially)
5. David Jacobs may be unreliable as the Emma Woods fiasco shows
6. Insectoids are the true aliens with the greys being some kind of hybrid attempts
Concerns are I've deduced only telepathic species can achieve interstellar travel because of the resources and knowledge pool required, it would need a cohesive society with no deviations from one part of the planet to another. They would need to work together for such an achievement. So naturally it makes sense these visitors are telepathic.
Also a plan of colonization would only make sense if you were bioforming your species, that would leave the environment intact and all the resources instead of terraforming which would destroy or alter them. Infact terraforming as we think of it may be impossible on a planetary scale. The idea they are attempting this is supportive they are real as it makes sense and falls in line with a reason.
Just a few thoughts
I know you will simply ignore it... as you are want to do... but for the sake of "doing my job", I am obligated to remind you:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/sciforums-site-rules.142880/
Knowingly posting false or misleading information
15. The intentional posting of false or misleading information is unacceptable. This includes posting half-truths, i.e. leaving out relevant and known information to give a false impression
Trolling
18. Trolling is the posting of inflammatory posts with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional (often angry) response. Trolls aim to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, often by raising tangential or irrelevant hot-button issues. Trolling posts are intended to incite controversy or conflict and/or to cause annoyance or offence.
Trolls are damaging to online communities because they attempt to pass as legitimate participants in discussions while actually seeking to disrupt normal conversation and debate. If permitted to remain, trolls tend to reduce the level of trust among members in an online community. One consequence may be that truly naive posts are rejected by sensitised members as just more examples of trolling.
Trolls tend to follow certain patterns of behaviour that may include:
- Posting of similar responses and topics repeatedly.
- Avoiding giving answers to direct questions put to them.
- Never attempting to justify their position.
- Demanding evidence from others while offering none in return.
- Vanishing when their bluff is called, only to reappear in a different thread arguing the same point.
- Deliberately derailing discussions onto tangential matters in order to try to control the flow of discussion.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
With all due respect:
is only true if the listed rules are enforced.
An interesting artifact :
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/299976/mystery-surrounds-object-found-in-romania.
Apparently 250,000yrs old , of metallic aluminium.
our first evidence , physical , of a higher form of intelligence ? Sure looks that way .
The piece definately looks machined .
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/299976/mystery-surrounds-object-found-in-romania.
Apparently 250,000yrs old , of metallic aluminium.
our first evidence , physical , of a higher form of intelligence ? Sure looks that way .
The piece definately looks machined .
Last edited:
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Wow! I stand corrected!
Believe me... the rules are slowly starting to be actually enforced after an odd period of being quite loose in several sub-forums for reasons I do not (and cannot) agree with.
Anyway I reiterate :
An interesting artifact :
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/299976/mystery-surrounds-object-found-in-romania.
Apparently 250,000yrs old , of metallic aluminium.
our first evidence , physical , of a higher form of intelligence ? Sure looks that way .
The piece definitely looks machined .
An interesting artifact :
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/299976/mystery-surrounds-object-found-in-romania.
Apparently 250,000yrs old , of metallic aluminium.
our first evidence , physical , of a higher form of intelligence ? Sure looks that way .
The piece definitely looks machined .
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
BZZT! Web sites don't count. You said so yourself.
You promised us books. Full of irrefutably compelling evidence. Mounds and mounds of it. Great honkin' libraries.
Cough up.
To read about a subject throughly you need to read a book .
This is an object found .
Bzzt.
Actually it's evidence of lower intelligence.
Namely: those who believe it's 250,000 years old.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Wedge_of_Aiud
"The wedge is simply a tooth from a modern day excavator bucket, the kind used by workers digging foundations for construction projects. The results of metallurgical tests made on the wedge are consistent with modern 2000 series duralumin..."
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Heh! The moment I saw it, the first thing I thought was "that looks like a tooth from an excavator". But I thought that was to silly to say out loud.
When you read the article in my post # 715 , it's so clear cut , as to be a tooth from an excavator .
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
YOU claim to have read them.
And YOU make the claim that we are ignorant of all these wonderful things.