Why does the government hide UFO's?
- Thread starter darksidZz
- Start date
Well nice to see you step back a bit and admit there are other possibilities, as that is what we all have been trying to tell yourself and MR.
So you can't back up your claim about materials used for bucket teeth? (Still, inventing "facts" is fairly standard behaviour from you).
And you're simply ignoring everything written in the link you gave (and quoted in its entirety).
All because you want to believe.
Amazing.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
That is exactly what I was thinking. Riv is displaying the same
as Magical Realist has been.
And look where he is now.
I also loved the X-Files and Gillian Anderson in particular, but they should have had a warning classification along the lines of, "Gullibles, please watch with your parents"
Really Dydyr . Inventing facts ? I haven't ignored any facts . Because I want to believe ?
Hmm... where dydyr does this article say that this object is unequivocally an excavator tooth ?
The article doesn't .
It seems more that you want to believe , that it is nothing more than an excavation machine tooth . At least you hope .
Yes, your unsupported claim: The thing is , is that this 2000 series was never used for excavator teeth .
Oops, and another invention of yours. Nowhere have I claimed that it's unequivocally an excavator tooth.
It being an excavator tooth is the likeliest explanation: there's no need whatsoever to invoke aliens or ancient technologies to explain the thing.
There is though ; because if not an excavator tooth what then ; and who made it ? Aliens or ancient tech. , who knows .
But we do know that Gobekli Tepi is 12000yrs old .
So what I'm saying is that , there is alot of our past we have no idea about ; how advanced we really were . We are learning everyday though .
No.
Unless there is good reason to discount the excavator tooth hypothesis then there's no need whatsoever to speculate further.
Learn to spell: Tepe.
And so what if it's 12,000 years old?
There's no evidence of anything "advanced" or even particularly unusual (except for societally) about it.
Some of us are learning, others (e.g. you) just accept the crank claims as factual.
Still can't admit to making up "facts"?
Not surprised by your response dyr your a conservative fella ; well many here are .
I'm not ; well I'm sometimes ; read , seen and heard some bizzare stories ; I just take in stride and try not to prejudge ; as many do .
This Planet ; the Universe can be quite ......challenging to ones understanding of the things in it and life itself , is that not true dyr ?
Assumption on your part.
And you're gullible.
Except that you have prejudged: you appear to be still maintaining that there's some other viable explanation (i.e. you've "prejudged" that the excavator tooth is not in fact a sufficient explanation).
To the extent of lying by inventing "facts".
I have no idea how manage to get "dyr" as a diminutive of Dywyddyr (unless - as evidenced by your posts - you have little idea of spelling and punctuation).
You said the same about me river.The point is as boring as it probably sounds to you, extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence...not any plunging into conspiracy type nonsense etc.
As I have told you before, I most certainly believe [have faith if you will] that we are not alone in this universe, but I also recognise the fact that we have as yet, no evidence at all for any ETL, intelligent or otherwise, existing anywhere in the universe, let alone having visted Earth to conduct anal probing medical experiments on poor unsuspecting impressionables!
The point is as boring as it probably sounds to you, extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence...not any plunging into conspiracy type nonsense etc.
As I have told you before, I most certainly believe [have faith if you will] that we are not alone in this universe, but I also recognise the fact that we have as yet, no evidence at all for any ETL, intelligent or otherwise, existing anywhere in the universe, let alone having visted Earth to conduct anal probing medical experiments on poor unsuspecting impressionables!
There is evidence for ETL's but of course ; you wouldn't admit it .
No need to be base pad .
What is this extraordinary evidence for ETL off this planet river?
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Sorry buddy, many explanations for that, and I posted a link accordingly explaining it.
Again no extraordinary evidence exists for any extra terrestrial life off this earth.
Last edited:
The link explaining the Xenon, along with other fabricated issues pushed by those that want to believe, in our previous exchange.
I'm sure you'll be skillful enough to find it.
The link explaining the Xenon, along with other fabricated issues pushed by those that want to believe, in our previous exchange.
I'm sure you'll be skillful enough to find it.
Provide the link pad .