Right. Except that's argument by incredulity. Others use such arguments, often to refute such things as Darwinian Evolution, but "I don't understand it, therefore it doesn't exist" is not a valid argument.Any hypothetical Alien, that has presumably traveled L/years to reach us, need be intelligent, and would not need to be afraid of us or our technology, and of course would not really want of anything.
So again, why all the secrecy...sorry Dave, I really am unable to fathom that.
Yes. Which is why the issue is generally on-hold. All that can be shown has been shown, until/unless there's new evidence that's a game-changer.I totally agree with that, but hasn't that been already done?
This is a good case. If they are studying us (as, say the only other sentient race in the area), they would not want the scientists to befriend the lab rats.What if they're little green anthropologists?
Perhaps we have a situation of my incredulity versus the far bigger dose of incredulity that jumping immediatly to the "Alien" explanation does.Right. Except that's argument by incredulity. Others use such arguments, often to refute such things as Darwinian Evolution, but "I don't understand it, therefore it doesn't exist" is not a valid argument.
(Not to mention the fact that it weakens the skeptical stance. If we open the door to speculation about what we "suppose" aliens might be thinking, the pro-alien nuts will have a field-day - that is exactly kind of no-rules, can't-be-proven-wrong arena they'd like to play in.)
Right, agreed again. So we have a situation that since extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The many thousands of reports of Aliens/UFO's, the vast majority that have been explained, leaving a few as simply UFO's. And the incredulity of those reports mostly all rest on personal sighting accounts, or fuzzy blurry photographs, yet still like Bigfoot, no physical evidence, no alien artifact, or syringe, no body or DNA, no nothing.Yes. Which is why the issue is generally on-hold. All that can be shown has been shown, until/unless there's new evidence that's a game-changer.
Well, after they leave their government positions, they can spill the beans. Anyone here seen this? What do you think?
The literally thousands and thousands of Alien origin UFO reports sightings/kidnappings/medical procedures, in itself speaks volumes.
[1] Why only always single individuals or small groups of people that are witnessed to such events?
[2] Why most in out of the way places?
[3] why never ever any hard evidence? you know, bodies, excrement, other unearthly artifacts.
[4] Such Alien beings would be far in advanced of us and certainly not fearfull of us, so why the general "secret"type of visitations?
[5] Considering [4] why after so many thousands of sightings, have they not made their visitations official? [you know, appearing in front of the White House or Sydney Harbor Opera House forecourts]
[6]Why all the flittering in then flittering out again without any further contact?
[7] Considering [6] these beings have obviously travelled many light years, so again, why just flitter in then flitter out again, until the next so called visitation, when again, they flitter in and flitter out again.
[8]Why all reported Aliens are of the usual "Hollywood style"body shape and colour? You know, big head with big eyes, grey colour etc
That's just off the top of my head.....yeah certainly one great big fat yawn!
BINGO!!!!!That's why I like my time-traveler speculation.
Assuming, totally hypothetically, simply for the sake of argument, simply for purposes of speculation,.
BINGO!!!!!
Yes it's speculative and many other speculative scenarios also abound.
And that is all anyone is ever saying about those few UFO's that remain unexplained.
Hence the term UFO.
As usual, for any firm declaration as to their nature, if that nature is extraordinary, then the usual rule applies: Extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence.
If it were extraordinary evidence, it would not need exploration to find.The extraordinary evidence exists ; it just takes some people time to explore ( investigate for themselves ) the extraordinary claims that shows the extraordinary evidence .
If it were extraordinary evidence, it would not need exploration to find.
Only in the minds of the impressionable and gullible.The extraordinary evidence exists ; it just takes some people time to explore ( investigate for themselves ) the extraordinary claims that shows the extraordinary evidence .
Only in the minds of the impressionable and gullible.
No extraordinary evidence exists in actual fact for anything that you have claimed exists, including ghosts, goblins, giants, Bigfoot, anal probing Aliens, or anything that I may have missed.
I've read plenty of books, including a few by cranks and quacks to get an idea how they operate: Let me list them.So you say ; but you have read no books .
I'm certainly not manipulated by the quacks and cranks in this world, as you obviously are.So you are manipulated by your ignorance .
Bingo! Correct! Thanks MR: Off goes my head and on goes a Pumpkin!I think you mean Charles Berlitz, not Charles Schultz. Unless that was the lost episode where Snoopy got lost flying thru the Bermuda Triangle.
Well pad such shallow knowledge .
You just skiffed the surface of what is thought and known . In 2016 .
I'll let my record here and yours, stand at the judgement of our peers, OK?