Why does the government hide UFO's?

Pad, was the thing you saw a perfect circle?
If so, then if it was a typical saucer-shaped craft, why would it be flying at an orientation that just happened to always be such that you saw a perfect disc? In no photo ive ever seen of UFOs is the craft perfectly circular in profile. You would need to be looking straight up at it or down on it.
Although a spherical craft would always appear circular in the sky.

There is one thing, though, that is circular and moon-sized in the sky... :)

Is it possible that it was a mirage of the actual moon, just as there have been mirage of cityscapes seen in the sky (which led some to believe NASA was building a floating city!)?
:)
 
Magical Realist said:
And as usual you have nothing to refute the evidence with which is why you hurl childish insults. So what else is new?
Click to expand...
You haven't given ANY evidence to suggest that Paddoboy's UFO is a craft piloted by "nonhuman" intelligences that somehow aren't aliens.

Again, why do you think Paddoboy's UFO is one of the [nonhuman intelligence piloted craft] and not one of the non-[nonhuman intelligence piloted craft] with a mundane explanation?
 
Daecon said:
You haven't given ANY evidence to suggest that Paddoboy's UFO is a craft piloted by "nonhuman" intelligences that somehow aren't aliens.

Again, why do you think Paddoboy's UFO is one of the [nonhuman intelligence piloted craft] and not one of the non-[nonhuman intelligence piloted craft] with a mundane explanation?
Click to expand...

Buzz off troll.
 
Either all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft, or they're not.

If they are, then you should give evidence that all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft.

If they're not, you should give evidence that Paddoboy's UFO was an otherworldly craft and not a mundane phenomenon.
 
Sarkus said:
Pad, was the thing you saw a perfect circle?
If so, then if it was a typical saucer-shaped craft, why would it be flying at an orientation that just happened to always be such that you saw a perfect disc? In no photo ive ever seen of UFOs is the craft perfectly circular in profile. You would need to be looking straight up at it or down on it.
Although a spherical craft would always appear circular in the sky.

There is one thing, though, that is circular and moon-sized in the sky... :)

Is it possible that it was a mirage of the actual moon, just as there have been mirage of cityscapes seen in the sky (which led some to believe NASA was building a floating city!)?
:)
Click to expand...
Yep, it was a perfect circle and appeared right on the horizon....Yep certainly it may have been a mirage, but don't tell MR that! ;)
Could have been some one playing with a balloon also, who knows.
To say though that what I saw was Alien, or some interdimensional being is a Daecon has said a total lack of critical thinking on MR's part.
 
paddoboy said:
:) I have dealt with it, and like your own rather biased views, have totally dismissed it as has the forum in general.
Click to expand...

You speak only for yourself. I've done MY job and presented the evidence. It's up to everyone else to decide for themselves and research it further should they choose to. There is no hiding behind a mob mentality here. It is what it is.
 
Either all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft, or they're not.

If they are, then you should give evidence that all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft.

If they're not, you should give evidence that Paddoboy's UFO was an otherworldly craft and not a mundane phenomenon.
 
Magical Realist said:
You speak only for yourself. I've done MY job and presented the evidence. It's up to everyone else to decide for themselves and research it further should they choose to. There is no hiding behind a mob mentality here. It is what it is.
Click to expand...
Yes, I speak for myself certainly, and you also most certainly have done your job in presenting a load of evidence, some nonsensically false, some questionable, some intriguing, some Interesting, but none extraordinary enough to show that any of your presentations are either Alien in origin or extra dimensional as you seem so anxious to convey.
 
i agree with MR-- if his post are in the correct sectors--then why is everyone still harassing him-- why can he not have his say under the sector that is designed for his say?-- i see this a lot here-- people whine that topics are not in the right sectors and this is the reason for the harassing--but when moved to the proper sectors--people still continue to harass--- i do not get it. MY GOD-- this is simply the fringe sector.
 
Daecon said:
Why do you think it was a craft? What evidence has lead you to believe Paddoboy saw a craft specifically? What gave you the impression that it was a technological construction?
Click to expand...
I once saw an unknown craft flying beneath me. It flew about 1000 feet beneath me and had blue and red navigation lights (normal in the US is green and red with white in back.) It was definitely a UFO but I suspect it was just an airplane.
 
Magical Realist said:
LOL! So all those thousands of people and the Belgian airforce just made all this up? That's the absurd and non-evidenced attempt to "explain away" something that doesn't support your faith-based worldview. What am I supposed to do? Take your explanation on faith?
Click to expand...

An interesting thing about the Belgium case: If you watch the cockpit RADAR recording from the jet in pursuit [released by the BAF], the target actually goes below ground level for a moment. And the pilot never made visual contact. I have often suspected that this was a false image being projected from a stealth blimp nearby. The blimp accounts for the observations by eye witnesses on the ground. In other words, I wonder if this could have been a military test of new technology that combines stealth along with false image transmission. From what I understand this technology is now known to exist, which supports my long-held suspicions about this case.

So who is Russ accusing me of being this year? :D I see that after what, 13 years, nothing has changed! LOL!!!
 
Last edited:
Ivan Seeking said:
An interesting thing about the Belgium case: If you watch the cockpit RADAR recording from the jet in pursuit [released by the BAF], the target actually goes below ground level for a moment. And the pilot never made visual contact. I have often suspected that this was a false image being projected from a stealth blimp nearby. The blimp accounts for the observations by eye witnesses on the ground. In other words, I wonder if this could have been a military test of new technology that combines stealth along with false image transmission. From what I understand this technology is now known to exist, which supports my long-held suspicions about this case.

So who is Russ accusing me of being this year? :D I see that after what, 13 years, nothing has changed! LOL!!!
Click to expand...

Nope..a stealth blimp can't elude pursuing jets or suddenly accelerate to thousands of mph. The thousands of accounts also confirm several triangular craft. Not a blimp. Also note visuals of the movement of the craft during the jet pursuit were confirmed by witnesses:

"During this time, ground witnesses broadly corroborate the information obtained by radar. They described seeing the smaller triangle completely disappear from sight at one point, while the larger triangle moved upwards very rapidly as the F-16s flew past. After 00:30, radar contact became much more sporadic and the final confirmed lock took place at 00:40. This final lock was once again broken by an acceleration from around 160 km/h to 1,120 km/h, after which the radar of the F-16s and those at Glons and Semmerzake all lost contact. Following several further unconfirmed contacts, the F-16s eventually returned to base shortly after 01:00."==https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_UFO_wave
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top