kx000
Valued Senior Member
It makes perfect sense that an ignorant crank will quote a crank website.
Fail.
Its science you damn bigot. About 250 (223 apparently) human genes are not terrestrial.
It makes perfect sense that an ignorant crank will quote a crank website.
Fail.
Nope.Its science you fucking bigot.
Nope.About 250 (223 apparently) human genes are not terrestrial.
Hmm, strange claim for someone who has also stated:Its science you damn bigot.
Lol.. science vs. bible. Neither of them really mater.
Nope.
Nope.
Do try to use science (as opposed to crank) sites for reference.
And now another evasion.
What question? The "And so?"?
Okay: evolution is a scientific process, not a philosophical one. Hence using it in a philosophical sense is a misuse.
Incorrect.
Scripture claims we were created ab initio as fully-formed humans. Evolution states otherwise.
Hmm, strange claim for someone who has also stated:
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2806439&postcount=10
Typical crank, dismiss science until you find something you think supports you.
I don't know if scriptures actually say that Dw? There is this thing were it says formed from the dust of the earth I do believe . That sounds like an evolution type thinking to Me , but what do I know I read whimsical ideas into all kinds of " It's"
http://www.easyenglish.info/bible-commentary/genesis-mwks1-lbw.htmv27 So God created people so that they were like himself. He created people as his image. He created them as man and woman.
Huh?If you give me a reason to change my P.O.V. I will.
These are mutations which show up in some and not others, on an unpredictable basis.
What do you consider as 'proof'?
Huh?
You've already changed it.
In one post you claim science doesn't matter, in the other you're calling on it back up your fallacious view.
How much effort do you put into being clueless? Or does it just come naturally?
http://www.easyenglish.info/bible-commentary/genesis-mwks1-lbw.htm
Adam and Eve arrived as fully-formed huumans.
No evolution.
http://www.easyenglish.info/bible-commentary/genesis-mwks1-lbw.htm
Adam and Eve arrived as fully-formed huumans.
No evolution.
Then why call on it?IT. DOES. NOT. MATER. Period.
Not only false but stupidly so.It is not necessary. The only thing that truly maters is love.
Of course it does. If evolution happened then Adam and Eve weren't created as humans by god.The bible is bull shit. Evolution happened. That does not disprove Adam, and Eve however.
Okay, but talk about the present. Does it not justify the OP question. Theist are still compatible with evolution...
How you understand Evolution as pure science vs how you use it to understand the world philosophically is not the same thing
And it only took 4 billion years, I guess he wasn't in a hurry to see us.
For me the evidence of evolution takes center stage over that which has no evidence to support.
And what of the evidence for evolution and it's impact on the religious ?
Evolution's so called 'random processes' have no evidence for randomness.
Because we realize that 7 days for a being to whom time and space are no obsticle can be a very long time to us. About 15 billion years give or take.
Also, IF it is actually God speaking to man then we would have been stupid at the time when it was dictated.
The concept of a billion was not even full realized at this time.
Even if the person that it was dictated was shown the light, how would that person explain it to the masses? It knew that we would figure it out eventually.