No, spelling.
Well so far you're fitting right in.
objective or intelligent?
Unfortunately it's none of those.
You have been asked this before: what possible reason do you have for thinking (apologies for my misuse of the word there) that this could have any meaning whatsoever in reality?
And maybe you should come up with "ideas" that at least bear some resemblance to science and reality. As opposed to spouting specious unsubstantiated crap that makes you come across as a woo woo.
Make it and prove it to me. It can be made. That we both know.
What specifically signifies that it does not? If you don't picture the ideal, you can't criticize properly. How do you not understand this simple 100 year old analogy. The only possibility I can think of is that I have somehow ran a string of sentences that is infallible. It goes completely over your head and you reject a true reality at this particular crossroads in your epistemology.
Fail.
Wrong: you made the claim - substantiate it.
Also wrong.
Er no. You have posted this specious (and unscientific) idea. What makes you think it has ANY scientific substance?
What exactly do you mean by "Assimilate all the elements of the periodic table into a singular object"? Some sort of weird machine with unnecessary components?
Still wrong - take a look at how the thing would fir together and/ or work (or rather not work).All those little chemical reactions in one place and you say it does not refer to reality. Right
Your yet to falsify it. Therefore infallible. The proof is in the pudding once you get your head out your arse and help society actually move foreword by
Oh, So only I have heard on nanotechnology. Great I'm leading a paradigm shift with a box full of morons.
Specious how? Unscientific how?
Well eventually the heaviest elements will settle to the bottom, but kinetic energy will keep the insides turning until the protons decay.
Oh wrong again. You made the claim it's up to you to support it it.
Wrong.
Because an arm-waving claim with no support and no actual evidence isn't scientific.
Still not clear. What do you mean exactly?
:roflmao:
It it?
You should not be looking for what is wrong in your own mind, but how it applies to my ideology. How does reality nanotechnology change the reality of our understanding?
No evidence against my position does not falsify my position. In fact it just makes me feel more comfortable with my ideology.
CLEAR?
Well then picture my ideology. Then prove protons decay (which you can't) so I can't say the object will in fact last forever.
No you didn't.
Bullshit.
Neither does it lend support. Or validate it.
No.
False argument.
Huh? You've been under the assumption you dislike me?
Also wrong. I haven't dodged.
Oh you're assuming again. And didn't you claim to be not a theist?
And now you're descending even further into gibberish.
So what?
Yes, you're very good at drawing conclusion from your own simple misunderstandings.
Irrelevant
Ignorance
So your admitting in front of an audience none of your statements have a cause/effect relationship against mine.
Well there is the 100 billion dollar question right there isn't it? I mean that LITERALLY.
Using the negative assumptions you leave blind against you? There isn't a word for that type of logic. We both know I can't pull a lawyer in here and say "OBJECTION ARGUMENTATIVE" and actually move on to getting work done.
Not until all your please moderator come HElp me please remarks. I got something over 100 years old for that logical escape route(=
Alright fine. I'll wait till your ready. First I thought of you as a teacher. Now I see you have no feeling for the fact prophetic men suffer a great deal.
Duh... Hello. American.
"Life no argument.-We have fixed up a world for ourselves in which we can live-assuming bodies, lines, planes, causes and effects, motion and rest, form and content: without these articles of FAITH, nobody now would endure life. Life is no argument; the conditions of life could include error."-Nietzsche
The second sentence kinda was my so what.
I know it so help me out and actually reach for something every once in a while.
I agree. You guys have hijacked this discussion and turned it into a name-calling contest.
It's irrelevant that you haven't actually shown your claim has any basis in reality?
Wow! You really do have trouble comprehending English don't you? That's not what I said, nor was it implied.
But inaccurately and falsely.
Word salad.
Re-read what I wrote. I may help you to understand.
Your peers? The other inmates of the asylum?
Prophetic?
And?
Er, no. You've shown no evidence whatsoever that you're capable of philosophy (note, reading books written by philosophers and quoting them does not make you a philosopher), let alone doing anything for me.
You need a brain and some rationality first.What is it that makes great men. What are the factors that lead to an Ubermensche? From the sturdiest thief to the supreme dictator. I need better influences
Cause optical computer. effect detection of higgs boson and proof (or lack-thereof) of dark matter. How is this unclear?It's irrelevant that you haven't actually shown your claim has any basis in reality?
Yet you don't refute that you did not refute my statements. Afraid of yourself to a degree no matter what you say in response. Truth. Because I used to be afraid. What have you become? A monster?
Then where would you ballpark the guesstimate cost of finding 108 samples of each pure element and assembling them using nano-tech into an optical computer? The but implies feasibility.
It was a joke. You missed it or more likely found it displeasing.
How can I say this as an American... I'm right. Your as wrong as the wrongs you dish out unto others. I spill hateful vile truthful words. You will never understand me.
Oh please a psychologist friend is vastly different than the people who actually live in the asylum. Still I think a trip there would bring you back to reality. I'm completely ignorant of any information you would refer to as reality. What do you consider real?
Well I certainly don't have down syndrome. Back in my original days (remember I "believe" I'm Nietzsche) you might be considered slightly retarded just for carrying on like you do. Knowing your every move is irrelevant and doing nothing to stop it. Perhaps I give you too much credit in the "knowing" department. The questions you ask me are the very things you know the least. Why would you ask them otherwise?
Well frankly I'm trying to find out why you dislike me but you keep coming up with the same answers.
So your saying I know nothing of life and (since incapable) should kill myself. That sounds like a highly evolved threat on my life.
Rationality ex post facto.— Whatever lives long is gradually so saturated with reason that its irrational origins become improbable. Does not almost every accurate history of the origin of something sound paradoxical and sacrilegious to our feelings? Doesn’t the good historian contradict all the time?-Nietzsche
I told you The whole damn thing was Nietzsche's Mother fucking idea. I've had it stuck in my head since before I can remember and it causes me great suffering to not see it. Physically, mentally, weak somethimes just by the way I watch how others live their lives these days. GO!!! Leave you disgusting creature.
