Originally posted by Jenyar
It's an expression, like "the power of positive thinking". Nobody is implying that postive thinking is a power by itself.
You're so full of it. Positive thinking IS powerful! It's proof that God resides within.
Originally posted by Jenyar
It's an expression, like "the power of positive thinking". Nobody is implying that postive thinking is a power by itself.
Is positive thinking powerful per se, or does it just empower the person doing the thinking? That's my (or Paul's) point with the cross.Originally posted by Medicine*Woman
You're so full of it. Positive thinking IS powerful! It's proof that God resides within.
Originally posted by Jenyar
Is positive thinking powerful per se, or does it just empower the person doing the thinking? That's my (or Paul's) point with the cross.
It's a sign of injustice and suffering. The resurrection was a sign of victory over these. The cross represents death, but the man on the cross represents life.Originally posted by Medicine*Woman
Positive thinking is powerful BECAUSE it empowers the person who uses it and creates all things good to happen.
There is nothing powerful about the cross. It's a sign of defeat.
Originally posted by Jenyar
It's a sign of injustice and suffering. The resurrection was a sign of victory over these. The cross represents death, but the man on the cross represents life.
No, resurrection and reincarnation are two different things, and have different implications. I still don't know why you prefer secondhand information about Jesus. Why not believe that his followers represented his words truthfully? If not Paul, then John, or the gospels? You cannot wrest Jesus from his connection with the God of Israel, he depended too much on the Jewish Laws and Prophets for his credibility.Originally posted by Medicine*Woman
Because the One Spirit of God dwells within us, we too are "resurrected" (reincarnated) into a new body and a new life. The man on the cross was the teacher who tried to teach about the power (energy) of God, but his followers made him into a god and the truth has been lost (or hidden or perverted). OUR LIVES represent the One Spirit of God. Otherwise, why would there be a need to teach us about this?
Originally posted by Jenyar
No, resurrection and reincarnation are two different things, and have different implications. I still don't know why you prefer secondhand information about Jesus. Why not believe that his followers represented his words truthfully? If not Paul, then John, or the gospels? You cannot wrest Jesus from his connection with the God of Israel, he depended too much on the Jewish Laws and Prophets for his credibility.
But do you believe what He taught? Shouldn't you believe in the Old Testament then?Jesus worshipped the God of Israel. He was a Rabbi. He taught the Jewish Laws and Prophets as it was his 'job'. I've never indicated otherwise about this.
How do you know? Do you have a source of original original words? What about the words quoted by all the other authors, and the Jewish beliefs He must have agreed with if He was a Rabbi?Since Jesus's original words were misquoted by Paul and others, the only consideration I give are to the known words of Jesus
Originally posted by Jenyar
But do you believe what He taught? Shouldn't you believe in the Old Testament then?
How do you know? Do you have a source of original original words? What about the words quoted by all the other authors, and the Jewish beliefs He must have agreed with if He was a Rabbi?
Jesus didn't break any Jewish rules
This is why he predicted that his followers would be thrown out of the synagogs. Jesus did not break the law though. Healing on the Sabath is what the Law should have meant to the Isrealites.That was his followers who made him the savior. Jesus didn't break any Jewish rules, he just tried to enlighten the Jews about the laws. His teachings aimed to enlighten them not save them. The only focus we need to put upon Jesus are to his teachings. Nothing else is necessary.
No, the Sabath was supposed to be the Lord's day. It was the day that the Isrealites were supposed to come to the Lord and rest within him. Mathew 12What do you mean by "should have meant"? Healing on the Sabbath was considered work, and as such, forbidden.
Then how did the Jews come to expect a Messiah, or were they deluded too?Nowhere in Isaiah does it mention, allude, foretell or insinuate anything about Jesus.
So, you know this for a fact? Can you show me any halakhic authority or midrash that forbids healing on Shabbat?Originally posted by Circe
Healing on the Sabbath was considered work, and as such, forbidden.
Jesus wanted to force them to redefine what "work" and the Sabbath actually means.Originally posted by Circe
It's been said that Jesus didn't break any Jewish rules. The Bible says otherwise
John 5:16-18
16 And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day.
17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.
18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.
Jesus wanted to force them to redefine what "work" and the Sabbath actually means.
No, he restored the meaning they were supposed to have.Originally posted by Circe
Agreed. And so he broke their meaningless rules.