Isnt this just the same arument that you presented in the last to threads you started why?
Why, can't I use an argument more than once per a thread?
*************No, I mean He really doesn't exist for atheists.
Denominations tend to distort/add to the original message. They are man-made. They add their own rules, beliefs, conditions etc.. We don't need denominations. We need to get back to the basics.
This is nonsense. The existence of something is not dependent on what people believe.No, I mean He really doesn't exist for atheists.
What the heck is this gibberish? Why might parralel universes exist? What basis do you use for the assertion that such things don't exist?Parallel universes may exist, and yet they don't exist here.
What basics? There are some 20,000 distinct Christian cults and sects all claiming an independent truth and interpretation of Christian mythology. The bible might offer some hope but that has dozens of versions and re-writes and interpretations that we are left with no definitive version of the original mythology.Denominations tend to distort/add to the original message. They are man-made. They add their own rules, beliefs, conditions etc.. We don't need denominations. We need to get back to the basics.
And you, no doubt, know just the person to take us there.
Aren't we all at work?
sandy:So, you'd presumably start by eliminating the distinction between Christianity and Judaism, since Jesus was a Jew himself. In fact, since Islam, Christianity and Judaism are all Abrahamic religions, there's no need to divide those "denominations", wouldn't you say?
Sandy,What basics?....
Not true. Parallel universes may exist, and yet they don't exist here.
Good point, but no. I would leave those all alone. Christianity and Islam are COMPLETE opposites. Devout Jews live by the Old Testament. The denominations I'm referring to are only those in Christianity. Too much splintering off.James R said:sandy:So, you'd presumably start by eliminating the distinction between Christianity and Judaism, since Jesus was a Jew himself. In fact, since Islam, Christianity and Judaism are all Abrahamic religions, there's no need to divide those "denominations", wouldn't you say?
forgive me if I'm wrong but dont you follow the old testament, isn't that in the Bible. you follow the Commandments dont you.The Bible. Jesus Christ.Cris said:Sandy,What basics?....
To cut in a bit, we do believe in the Old Testament, but the New Testament is more important for us now.forgive me if I'm wrong but dont you follow the old testament, isn't that in the Bible. you follow the Commandments dont you.
Sandy you are wrong, they are all from the same source, all Abrahamic religions.
and in answer to the OP, too much Alchohol probably.
Much so. God in a human form.Yes and according to the NT, Isn't "Jesus" God in flesh?
forgive me if I'm wrong but dont you follow the old testament, isn't that in the Bible. you follow the Commandments dont you.
Sandy you are wrong...
so you have confidence in the Commandments, but you dont accept the authority of them or give allegiance to them, explains a lot, thanks.Already answered by other posters. We believe the OT but follow the NT (New Testament/Covenant from Jesus Christ.) Devout Jews follow the OT.
so you have confidence in the Commandments, but you dont accept the authority of them or give allegiance to them, explains a lot, thanks.
whereas devout Jews are of a higher moral fibre, ok I understand now.
Which bible? Which variation? Which revision? Which translation? Whose interpretation?The Bible. Jesus Christ.
Which bible? Which variation? Which revision? Which translation? Whose interpretation? There are thousands of combinations. On what basis would you choose one of them as your "basics"? I assume you choose the particular cultural variation on which your personal indoctrination was based, and then assert that as the only true version. As will most other Christians who will assert the same but for their particular different variation.
Without a factual and reliable historical basis for your religion you will be unable to find any basics that have any signficant credibility beyond imaginative mythology.