What's new in Syria

Why this?

On the front of the fight with ISIS there has been also a small victory, a small village near the Kuweiris airport has been liberated. There seems to be more serious plans for the next days, see http://www.almasdarnews.com/article...eration-to-liberate-the-aleppo-thermal-plant/

ISIS simply plays no special role for Russia - it is simply one of many terrorist groups in Syria. Nonetheless, the deblocking of the Kuweiris airport was the first big victory after the Russians came, and it was against ISIS.

Russia claimed its purpose for intervening in Syria was to fight ISIS, not to prop up an unpopular dictator against the wishes of the Syrian majority. Amnesty International claims 85% of Russia's airstrikes are in areas with no ISIS presence, and that hospitals, schools and mosques are among the primary targets hit on a regular basis. Meanwhile ISIS continues to overrun Deir Ez-Zor with hundreds of kidnappings and murders in the last week alone, but you haven't said a word about it and the Russian media only appears to have given it a passing mention.

http://aranews.net/2016/01/islamic-state-militants-bomb-regime-held-districts-in-syrias-deir-ez-zor/
 
Reuters:
Three months into his military intervention in Syria, Russian President Vladimir Putin has achieved his central goal of stabilizing the Assad government and, with the costs relatively low, could sustain military operations at this level for years, U.S. officials and military analysts say.
...
"I think it's indisputable that the Assad regime, with Russian military support, is probably in a safer position than it was," said a senior administration official, who requested anonymity. Five other U.S. officials interviewed by Reuters concurred with the view that the Russian mission has been mostly successful so far and is facing relatively low costs.
 
Russia claimed its purpose for intervening in Syria was to fight ISIS, not to prop up an unpopular dictator against the wishes of the Syrian majority.
Wrong. Russia has said from the start that it will fight ISIS and other terrorist organizations, and that it will support the legal government of Syria. BTW, Assad is actually quite popular in Syria, and it is because of this that the US diplomats want to forbid that he can participate in future democratic elections. This is what Russia supports: a secular state, with democratic elections, where the Syrian people and not Washington decides who rules Syria - so that Assad should be allowed to participate too.
Amnesty International claims 85% of Russia's airstrikes are in areas with no ISIS presence, and that hospitals, schools and mosques are among the primary targets hit on a regular basis.
What AI claims is irrelevant, Russia has never made any claims about how many bombs it delivers to which terrorists, 5% or 95% to ISIS is completely irrelevant, and the other part is simply a propaganda lie.
Meanwhile ISIS continues to overrun Deir Ez-Zor with hundreds of kidnappings and murders in the last week alone, but you haven't said a word about it and the Russian media only appears to have given it a passing mention.
I have said something see #109. This "overrun" of the quite small area continues already many months, and probably will continue more months,with small gains and losses. It is fine that after my correction in #109 you now acknowledge that these have been kidnappings and murders of the civilian population, and not Syrian army soldiers who have been killed in hundreds as you have claimed in #107.
 
http://www.juancole.com/2016/01/top...in-syria-and-is-being-embraced-by-europe.html gives a nice overview over the situation in Syria, in particular it explains the situation before the Russians came, where the outlook was indeed something quite close to what has happened in Libya.

Regarding the question of the economic situation in Russia, http://www.forbes.com/sites/timwors...to-deal-with-oil-price-collapse/#38467e04362c gives a nice description why the actual situation is not that threatening - the falling ruble is what the falling oil price requires to do the right things in Russia economically: To reduce imports in general, to replace imports by domestic production, to export other things than oil and gas.

The article http://www.fuw.ch/article/die-gelassenheit-in-russland-uberrascht/ (in German) supports my claim that there is no panic among the Russians themself, and, by the way, notes that despite the low oil price Russia has no trade deficit - it gains more from exports than it pays for imports. And mentions, as an example, that Russia gains even from exporting software.

https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/putins-russia-more-stable-it-seems is also quite interesting, even if written by a clearly Russia-hating CIA guy. But he at least understands that the West has no chance with economic warfare to destroy Putin.
 
http://www.juancole.com/2016/01/top...in-syria-and-is-being-embraced-by-europe.html gives a nice overview over the situation in Syria, in particular it explains the situation before the Russians came, where the outlook was indeed something quite close to what has happened in Libya.

Regarding the question of the economic situation in Russia, http://www.forbes.com/sites/timwors...to-deal-with-oil-price-collapse/#38467e04362c gives a nice description why the actual situation is not that threatening - the falling ruble is what the falling oil price requires to do the right things in Russia economically: To reduce imports in general, to replace imports by domestic production, to export other things than oil and gas.

The article http://www.fuw.ch/article/die-gelassenheit-in-russland-uberrascht/ (in German) supports my claim that there is no panic among the Russians themself, and, by the way, notes that despite the low oil price Russia has no trade deficit - it gains more from exports than it pays for imports. And mentions, as an example, that Russia gains even from exporting software.

https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/putins-russia-more-stable-it-seems is also quite interesting, even if written by a clearly Russia-hating CIA guy. But he at least understands that the West has no chance with economic warfare to destroy Putin.

Seriously, did you read your Forbes reference? I suggest you read the last paragraph. Russia is devaluing its currency out of desperation. Russia has no other alternative but to devalue its currency as it has done. That means Russians are poorer. Mother Russia is doing the same things which led to the hyper inflation of the Weirmar Republic, and you want people to believe that is good? Russia has two alternatives, as pointed out in your Forbes reference, a sudden and massive prolonged depression or a less severe depression accompanied with hyper inflation. Russia has chosen the later.

As for panic among Russian...Russians are a very docile lot. Russians have tolerated much abuse from their leaders over the eons, beginning with the tsars. So abusive leadership isn't new to Russians. Russians are accustomed to suffering. Those few Russians who had the courage to protest were executed or emigrated. As has been previously pointed out to you, what Russians tolerate from their government would never be tolerated in the West. How long will Russians continue to tolerate Mother Putin, God only knows. But that doesn't change the fact, Mother Russia is growing weaker by the day. What I would expect to see is a pick up in Russian emigration rather than social unrest. Russian dissidents have a nasty way of turning up dead under mysterious circumstances.

Mother Russian's like you remind me of Monty Python's Black Knight.

Russia is so desperate, it is floating rumors of collaboration with OPEC just to get a temporary spike in oil prices.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...647c48-b0c4-11e5-b820-eea4d64be2a1_story.html

Mother Russia is in deep trouble. It's budget is based on $50.00 oil. Oil is now selling at $30.00 and will like drop even lower as Iran begins dumping oil into the market place. And with OPEC showing no interest in lowering production, that means oil is going even lower. Russia's in deep trouble. It isn't paying its employees....sound familiar? It's not the first time it has happened. As has been repeatedly brought to your attention, Putin is repeating all of the mistakes made by the Soviet Union. He hasn't learned a thing. Mother Russia hasn't learned a single thing. It's falling back into bad habits, the same bad habits which caused the collapse of the Soviet Union.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-budget-danger-rising-from-dramatic-oil-drop
 
Last edited:
I suggest you read the last paragraph. Russia is devaluing its currency out of desperation. Russia has no other alternative but to devalue its currency as it has done. That means Russians are poorer. Mother Russia is doing the same things which led to the hyper inflation of the Weirmar Republic, and you want people to believe that is good? Russia has two alternatives, as pointed out in your Forbes reference, a sudden and massive prolonged depression or a less severe depression accompanied with hyper inflation. Russia has chosen the later.
Completely off? A hyperinflation is something completely different. If the oil price is falling by a factor 2 you can buy 2 times less for your oil. That's all, and has nothing to do with a hyperinflation. Russians are a little bit poorer, because they can buy less things from US and EU. Nothing has changed with thing produced in Russia. A one time effect, which can be reverted if the oil price is raising again, which will happen in some future.
Russia is so desperate, it is floating rumors of collaboration with OPEC just to get a temporary spike in oil prices.
LOL. What would be desperate with a big oil producer cooperating with a powerful oil producer cartel? By the way, these are rumors. I can imagine that Russia is not interested.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...647c48-b0c4-11e5-b820-eea4d64be2a1_story.html
YMMD, an American propaganda paper whining that there is too much free speech in Russia instead of American political correctness, and remembers good old Breshnew time: "While Soviet-era anti-American propaganda could be sharp, it did not employ slurs. But in recent years ..."

By the way, yet another propaganda lie: The original comment by Putin was "You have asked if there was a third side involved. I understand your idea, but we don't know. If somebody from the Turkish leadership decided to lick the Americans in a certain place, I don't know if they were right or not." WP makes "Putin opined that “the Turks decided to lick the Americans in a certain place.”" out of this.

Another example of a primitive propaganda technique:
Nobody in Russia gets to freelance propaganda-wise. Thus, anti-Obama rants, even when coming from prominent individuals outside government, have Putin’s imprimatur. .... Meanwhile, the famous nationalist comedian Mikhail Zadornov regularly deploys the term “schmoe”
So, all the nonsense people talk in a state full of often very indecent free speech becomes Putin's personally approved propaganda. To attribute everything evil to the leader of the enemy is a classical propaganda technique. "Putin’s anti-Obama propaganda is ugly and desperate" makes this aim of the article clear: personalization.

The funny thing is to use Zadornov as an example of somebody who would care about getting "Putin's imprimatur". But, of course, to understand how funny this is one has to know him, heard some of the jokes he makes about Putin and the whole Russian bureaucracy.
 
Completely off? A hyperinflation is something completely different. If the oil price is falling by a factor 2 you can buy 2 times less for your oil. That's all, and has nothing to do with a hyperinflation. Russians are a little bit poorer, because they can buy less things from US and EU. Nothing has changed with thing produced in Russia. A one time effect, which can be reverted if the oil price is raising again, which will happen in some future.

No, it isn’t. Since Putin’s aggression, Russia has been running double digit inflation rates. “Oil price falling by a factor of 2”, what the hell are you talking about? Oil has gone from nearly $145 a barrel to $28 a barrel. Oil has lost 80% of its value in a rather short period of time.

Per the article you referenced, Russians are a lot poorer and they are going to stay that way. Russia doesn’t produce all the things it needs from the West, and Russia is one of the least productive nations on the planet.

It isn’t a one-time effect. Russia is responding to deflation by printing rubles. That can only go on so long before hyperinflation occurs. As has been endlessly pointed out to you, oil prices are not rebounding. The long term trend is down. Iran has visions of dumping 2 or more million barrels per day on the market later this year, and OPEC has shown no interest in reducing oil output even as Mother Russia tries and fails to bring OPEC back. And despite predictions US oil production would decline in the face of higher oil prices, it hasn’t. New US offshore oil production has actually caused US oil production to increase. And here is the rub, any time the OPEC decides to increase the price of oil above $40 per barrel all that US oil production comes back in spades, if it ever declines. So at best, oil producers can hope for slightly higher prices….not anywhere near the $50 per barrel Russia has budgeted.

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/may2009/gb2009058_530398.htm

What would be desperate with a big oil producer cooperating with a powerful oil producer cartel? By the way, these are rumors. I can imagine that Russia is not interested.

No, these are not rumors. This is fact. Russia is desperately trying to rebuild OPEC and major OPEC countries have shown no interest in cooperating with Mother Russia. By the way, the US is the world’s largest oil producer followed by Saudi Arabia.

What YMMD, an American propaganda paper whining that there is too much free speech in Russia instead of American political correctness, and remembers good old Breshnew time: "While Soviet-era anti-American propaganda could be sharp, it did not employ slurs. But in recent years ..."

By the way, yet another propaganda lie: The original comment by Putin was "You have asked if there was a third side involved. I understand your idea, but we don't know. If somebody from the Turkish leadership decided to lick the Americans in a certain place, I don't know if they were right or not." WP makes "Putin opined that “the Turks decided to lick the Americans in a certain place.”" out of this.

Another example of a primitive propaganda technique:

So, all the nonsense people talk in a state full of often very indecent free speech becomes Putin's personally approved propaganda. To attribute everything evil to the leader of the enemy is a classical propaganda technique. "Putin’s anti-Obama propaganda is ugly and desperate" makes this aim of the article clear: personalization.

The funny thing is to use Zadornov as an example of somebody who would care about getting "Putin's imprimatur". But, of course, to understand how funny this is one has to know him, heard some of the jokes he makes about Putin and the whole Russian bureaucracy.

LOL, well now you are back to summarily and without merit dismissing information you find unpleasant as propaganda. The truth isn’t propaganda. It’s just the truth.
 
Why would Saudi Arabia throw a bone to Putin and reduce its share of the global oil market, just so Russia can have an easier time ethnically cleansing Sunni Arabs in Syria? Must be another one of those Bizarro World fantasies RT keeps cooking up for domestic consumption.
 
“Oil price falling by a factor of 2”, what the hell are you talking about? Oil has gone from nearly $145 a barrel to $28 a barrel. Oil has lost 80% of its value in a rather short period of time.
So what? You know the meaning of a sentence of type "If A then B"? Tip: It is different from "A". Another hint: The meaning of "If the oil price is falling by a factor 20 you can buy 20 times less for your oil" would be the same.

Russia doesn’t produce all the things it needs from the West, and Russia is one of the least productive nations on the planet.
LOL.
It isn’t a one-time effect. Russia is responding to deflation by printing rubles. That can only go on so long before hyperinflation occurs.
No. If the oil price does not fall more after this, one need no further reduction of the ruble. If Russia uses in general higher inflation rates has other reasons.
As has been endlessly pointed out to you, oil prices are not rebounding. The long term trend is down.
Repeating of nonsense does not make it right. At the actual oil price the production of oil decreases. This may be unproblematic during the start of a world-wide big economic downturn, which is what many people think actually happens. But if the world economy comes back, it will need oil, thus, oil prices will rise again.
So at best, oil producers can hope for slightly higher prices….not anywhere near the $50 per barrel Russia has budgeted.
First, you speculation that the oil price will be for long below 50$ is nonsense. Second, if Russia makes a budget, it has to expect what will be the oil price during the next year. No reasonable budget without reasonable predictions of the income. If the oil price is 150$, they will budget using 150$, if it will be 10$, they will use 10$. If the oil price falls beyond the expectations, they will cut the budget. Russia is not ruled by stupid Keynesians, so if there are no money they cut the budget.

It is funny that a response where, in a particular example of your propaganda, I identify one clear falsification (ok, you may not understand the difference between "If A then B" and "A", see above), a particular example of a common propaganda technique (personalization) and a laughable error applying it (presenting Zadornov as a propagandist of Putin) is rejected as
well now you are back to summarily and without merit dismissing information you find unpleasant as propaganda.
For those who understand Russian language, here some fun about Putin and Russian bureaucracy from Zadornov:
 
No. If the oil price does not fall more after this, one need no further reduction of the ruble. If Russia uses in general higher inflation rates has other reasons.

The Ruble will drop more once Russia starts grinding to a halt, the foreign currency reserves drain dry and companies start filing for bankruptcy. Right now most of the price changes are due to both optimistic and pessimistic speculation.

Repeating of nonsense does not make it right.

Unless it's nonsense repeated by RT, with its phony claims about Ukrainian Nazis based on footage from completely unrelated locations and time periods. Then it's as right as Newton's law of gravity.

At the actual oil price the production of oil decreases. This may be unproblematic during the start of a world-wide big economic downturn, which is what many people think actually happens. But if the world economy comes back, it will need oil, thus, oil prices will rise again.

Russia was starting to show signs of trouble even when oil was $100 a barrel. Too much corruption and government incompetence, too many eggs in one basket, a one-trick pony for an economy. Sanctions and oil prices just made it into an acute issue.

First, you speculation that the oil price will be for long below 50$ is nonsense.

As soon as oil hits something like $40 per barrel, all those Yankee shale producers you forgot about come right back online, and they'll be doing so on long-term contracts this time so their customers can avoid Russian and OPEC price manipulations. Plus Iran's looking to dump another 2 million barrels per day on the global market, so you're pretty much screwed. To your credit, at least you haven't made any suggestions yet of invading Saudi Arabia to try and shut down their oil production, unlike many Russian commenters around the web (as well as many disgruntled pro-Russian Americans upset that domestic violence is now being properly criminalized at home).

Second, if Russia makes a budget, it has to expect what will be the oil price during the next year. No reasonable budget without reasonable predictions of the income. If the oil price is 150$, they will budget using 150$, if it will be 10$, they will use 10$. If the oil price falls beyond the expectations, they will cut the budget. Russia is not ruled by stupid Keynesians, so if there are no money they cut the budget.

The only things left to cut are elderly pensions and military funds. You can't just stop repairing roads and piping gas to freezing homes, and Russian flags have no nutritional value.
 
So what? You know the meaning of a sentence of type "If A then B"? Tip: It is different from "A". Another hint: The meaning of "If the oil price is falling by a factor 20 you can buy 20 times less for your oil" would be the same.

What does "if A then B" have to do with the very basic fact I questioned what you meant when you wrote "“Oil price falling by a factor of 2" and pointed out to you oil prices have fallen by more than 80%. It's basic math. It isn't a matter of "if A, then B". :)

Additionally, there is this thing called supply and demand. Outside of Mother Russia, people don't buy stuff just because they can. People are not buying 20 times the amount of oil and that is a problem for Mother Russia. The supply of oil has outstripped the demand for oil. That's a problem for Mother Russia.


And that comrade is one reason why Mother Russia is in such a sad state once again.

No. If the oil price does not fall more after this, one need no further reduction of the ruble. If Russia uses in general higher inflation rates has other reasons.

Well that is what you want to believe. But as previously pointed out to you, that isn't what Russian banking officials are saying. And clearly, as previously pointed out to you, oil prices are going even lower. That's why Mother Russia is desperately attempting to reconstitute an oil cartel and to do so it needs the cooperation of other major oil producers - something it isn't likely to get. OPEC members have shown little interest in restricting oil supplies or cooperating with Mother Russia. Additionally, US oil production is a game changer. It's doubtful, that OPEC could control oil prices even it wanted to. As previously pointed out to you the US is the world's largest oil producer and US oil producers can now export oil and natural gas.

Repeating of nonsense does not make it right.

You should heed your own advice comrade. Reality isn't nonsense. Facts aren't nonsense either. Just because you don't like reality, it doesn't make reality or facts nonsense.

At the actual oil price the production of oil decreases. This may be unproblematic during the start of a world-wide big economic downturn, which is what many people think actually happens. But if the world economy comes back, it will need oil, thus, oil prices will rise again.

Well, not surprisingly you are conflating different issues. Supply doesn't decline just because prices fall. You obviously don't understand the supply-demand curve. Price is a function of supply and demand. Supply isn't a function of price. You obviously don't understand economic demand and the factors affecting economic demand.

Two, the world isn't in an economic downturn. Russia is. The world economy is slowing due to China. But China only represents 13% of world GDP. The demand for oil is growing, but it isn't growing faster than supply. And that is a problem for emerging countries who are heavily dependent upon oil exports (i.e. Russia), and it's a problem that isn't going away. New technologies are now emerging which greatly reduce the need for oil (e.g. electric cars and battery technologies). China has recently signed onto a deal to promote cleaner energy. Other major oil producers have been long aware this day was coming and have diversified their economies. Mother Russia has not and is now behind the 8 ball.

First, you speculation that the oil price will be for long below 50$ is nonsense.

Well here is the thing, as previously pointed out to you, oil is already well below 50 dollars per barrel and it's heading lower. Oil was selling for 28 dollars a barrel just a few days ago. That isn't speculation. That's a fact. But that hasn't stopped Mother Russia from using 50 dollars per barrel in their budget. Mother Russia hasn't adjusted her budget. The fact is Mother Russia has for years now been overly optimistic about oil prices. And Russian workers are going unpaid as a result.

And as previously pointed out to you, Iran intends to bring millions of barrels of additional oil to market in the coming months. The world is awash in oil. Those are facts comrade. That isn't speculation.

Second, if Russia makes a budget, it has to expect what will be the oil price during the next year. No reasonable budget without reasonable predictions of the income. If the oil price is 150$, they will budget using 150$, if it will be 10$, they will use 10$. If the oil price falls beyond the expectations, they will cut the budget. Russia is not ruled by stupid Keynesians, so if there are no money they cut the budget.

Enjoy the Kool-Aid comrade. As has been previously and repeatedly pointed out to you, your assertion just flies in the face of reality which is the norm for you. It has been 7 months since oil sold for 50 dollars a barrel. If Mother Russia isn't ruled by Keynesians, then why is Mother Russia printing money like there is no tomorrow in order to cushion the impact of deflation? Why has Mother Russia experienced double digit inflation since being sanctioned by the world for invading and annexing the lands of its neighbors?

It is funny that a response where, in a particular example of your propaganda, I identify one clear falsification (ok, you may not understand the difference between "If A then B" and "A", see above), a particular example of a common propaganda technique (personalization) and a laughable error applying it (presenting Zadornov as a propagandist of Putin) is rejected as

Yes, I think you have clearly established that you have a chronic case of "If A then B". But it isn't going to save you from reality. The facts are Mother Russia is in serious economic trouble. It cannot afford Putin's militarism. It can't even afford to pay its employees which is very reminiscent of what happened when The Soviet Union collapsed. As has been repeatedly brought to your attention Mother Russia and in particular Putin is repeating the mistakes of the Russia's past. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article4667617.ece
 
Last edited:
The poor Russians. Double digit Inflation is a terrible thing, especially for those with savings living on fixed incomes.
Sad, really, thinking of poor cold and hungry old people.
The savings dissipate like paper in the wind.
If this gets any worse, some of them will have to un-retire and go to work for Walmart as greeters.
 
The Ruble will drop more once Russia starts grinding to a halt, the foreign currency reserves drain dry and companies start filing for bankruptcy.
Which has to happen because you dream about it. There is no reason. Russia has yet a positive trade balance. Some of the currency reserves has been used to repay some of the dollar debts of companies, but the reduction of all debts has been much greater than the corresponding reduction of the reserves, so there is no reason to expect that they drain dry, except your dreams.
Unless it's nonsense repeated by RT, with its phony claims about Ukrainian Nazis
I'm really sorry that this horrible RT does distribute claims not in favour of your beloved Ukrainian Nazis.
Russia was starting to show signs of trouble even when oil was $100 a barrel. Too much corruption and government incompetence, too many eggs in one basket, a one-trick pony for an economy. Sanctions and oil prices just made it into an acute issue.
Very sorry for you that your dreams about Russian collapse, which you have had already with $100 a barrel do not become reality even with a price below 30.
As soon as oil hits something like $40 per barrel, all those Yankee shale producers you forgot about come right back online,
No, this comes much later. What is working, continues to work even now, because almost all the costs are before it starts giving oil. So, if the oil price rises, you have to find new investors to start new holes. I doubt new investors will start to invest at \$ 40. I would expect them closer to \$ 80 or so.

The only things left to cut are elderly pensions and military funds. You can't just stop repairing roads and piping gas to freezing homes, and Russian flags have no nutritional value.
You are wrong, the Russian state owns a lot of things, and has a lot of bureaucrats to be fired before anything bad happens.

But let's return to the topic. What's new in Syria:
Today, everything goes as usual. In Northern Latakia, the Syrian army has advanced a few km near the border, and taken one village there. Along the Latakia-Aleppo highway they have also advanced a few km and have taken there some small villages, also taken control of three tunnels of a nearby railway, and are now in a position 3 km West of Kinsabba, which is the last serious stronghold of the terrorists in Latakia. South of Kinsabba fighting goes around 3-4 km from Kinsabba. So, with advances at several different places continuing, aiming at Kinsabba and the Turkish border, the situation further detoriates for the terrorists.

In a little bit slower way the advances continue against ISIS near Kuweiris. Here, the Syrian army during the last week seems to work following the "one village per day" rule. Today it was a rather small village named Tanuza, 1.5 km away from the village Afeish which was taken yesterday. One may think that this is not much, but if ISIS would allow the continuation of this yet another one or two weeks, a nice piece of some 150 km^2 or so would be encircled. So they can hardly allow this, thus, they have to do something to stop this advance next week or at least the following.

What else? In Hama the terrorists have started a big offensive, have even reached some initial success, only to loose it today, see http://www.almasdarnews.com/article...buwaydah-and-several-points-in-northern-hama/ Similarly, there was an unsuccessful attempt to start an offensive around the Golan heights, see http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/islamists-launch-new-offensive-in-southwestern-syria/ In above regions there has been not much activity of the Syrian army all the time, as far as I remember, except for the first time in Northern Hama. It looks like the Russian advisers have recommended to stop this, it really made not much sense to attack there strategically. So, the army restricts itself to defense and waits. And, correspondingly, the terrorists in these regions are yet strong enough to start attacks, but nonetheless not strong enough to reach a lot with such attacks.
 
Which has to happen because you dream about it. There is no reason. Russia has yet a positive trade balance. Some of the currency reserves has been used to repay some of the dollar debts of companies, but the reduction of all debts has been much greater than the corresponding reduction of the reserves, so there is no reason to expect that they drain dry, except your dreams.

This is another case of where a little knowledge helps. The United States had a positive balance of trade too, just before it fell into The Great Depression. A positive balance of trade is no protection from inflation...oops. :) And Russia's foreign currency reserves have been used for than paying down debts. It has been used to prop up the ruble.

I'm really sorry that this horrible RT does distribute claims not in favour of your beloved Ukrainian Nazis.

Yeah, I think everyone here knows you have an aversion to reality.

Very sorry for you that your dreams about Russian collapse, which you have had already with $100 a barrel do not become reality even with a price below 30.

I guess that explains why the Russian state isn't paying its workers. :)

No, this comes much later. What is working, continues to work even now, because almost all the costs are before it starts giving oil. So, if the oil price rises, you have to find new investors to start new holes. I doubt new investors will start to invest at \$ 40. I would expect them closer to \$ 80 or so.

You are wrong, the Russian state owns a lot of things, and has a lot of bureaucrats to be fired before anything bad happens.

Yeah, it's working so well, Russia's economy has contracted by 5% or more and it has double digit inflation and people on the street protesting because they are not getting paid. :)

But let's return to the topic. What's new in Syria:
Today, everything goes as usual. In Northern Latakia, the Syrian army has advanced a few km near the border, and taken one village there. Along the Latakia-Aleppo highway they have also advanced a few km and have taken there some small villages, also taken control of three tunnels of a nearby railway, and are now in a position 3 km West of Kinsabba, which is the last serious stronghold of the terrorists in Latakia. South of Kinsabba fighting goes around 3-4 km from Kinsabba. So, with advances at several different places continuing, aiming at Kinsabba and the Turkish border, the situation further detoriates for the terrorists.

In a little bit slower way the advances continue against ISIS near Kuweiris. Here, the Syrian army during the last week seems to work following the "one village per day" rule. Today it was a rather small village named Tanuza, 1.5 km away from the village Afeish which was taken yesterday. One may think that this is not much, but if ISIS would allow the continuation of this yet another one or two weeks, a nice piece of some 150 km^2 or so would be encircled. So they can hardly allow this, thus, they have to do something to stop this advance next week or at least the following.

What else? In Hama the terrorists have started a big offensive, have even reached some initial success, only to loose it today, see http://www.almasdarnews.com/article...buwaydah-and-several-points-in-northern-hama/ Similarly, there was an unsuccessful attempt to start an offensive around the Golan heights, see http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/islamists-launch-new-offensive-in-southwestern-syria/ In above regions there has been not much activity of the Syrian army all the time, as far as I remember, except for the first time in Northern Hama. It looks like the Russian advisers have recommended to stop this, it really made not much sense to attack there strategically. So, the army restricts itself to defense and waits. And, correspondingly, the terrorists in these regions are yet strong enough to start attacks, but nonetheless not strong enough to reach a lot with such attacks.

LOL,.yeah, retreat into Assad's propaganda.
 
The poor Russians.

I know, why can't Mongols and Vikings just be left to do what Mongols and Vikings do best?

Double digit Inflation is a terrible thing, especially for those with savings living on fixed incomes.
Sad, really, thinking of poor cold and hungry old people.

Sure, and even sadder thinking of all the people made poor, cold, hungry and dead by the bombs their taxes pay for and their children drop from the sky.

The savings dissipate like paper in the wind.

Schmelzer says they're doing just fine.

If this gets any worse, some of them will have to un-retire and go to work for Walmart as greeters.

Given that Russia's education system already collapsed many years ago and has failed to imbue its graduates with the skills needed to participate in a dynamic economy, your assessment is correct. Unfortunately, Russia isn't a suitable investment climate for Walmart, and we have far too many Syrian and Ukrainian refugees in our queues to be taking on grumpy imperialist Russians looking for handouts and jobs greeting our shoppers.
 
What does "if A then B" have to do with the very basic fact I questioned what you meant when you wrote "“Oil price falling by a factor of 2" and pointed out to you oil prices have fallen by more than 80%. It's basic math. It isn't a matter of "if A, then B". :)
If you don't understand even this, I'm sorry for you.

But, ok, for the stupid: Find the difference between saying "If the oil price is falling by a factor 2 you can buy 2 times less for your oil", which is what I have actually said, and
“Oil price falling by a factor of 2", what you claim I have said.

Dreams about further falling oil prices (actually they even rise) and about US oil as a game changer deleted. You would better care about how the US oil producers survive the low oil price. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=79687&p=irol-rigcountsoverview suggests that the rig count is seriously going down, now being 619, down -924 in comparison with last year.
Supply doesn't decline just because prices fall.
Of course, once the rig is working and the oil comes out, one will not stop this because of a lower price. But nobody invests into new rigs, so with some delay in time the supply goes down.

Two, the world isn't in an economic downturn.
Not yet, but there seem to be a lot of indicators that this has to be expected. If this does not happen, fine. But if it happens, then the prices of all raw materials tend to go down.
And then, of course, oil would remain down or even go further down during the whole crisis time.
New technologies are now emerging which greatly reduce the need for oil (e.g. electric cars and battery technologies). China has recently signed onto a deal to promote cleaner energy. Other major oil producers have been long aware this day was coming and have diversified their economies. Mother Russia has not and is now behind the 8 ball.
Electric cars seem quite stupid, first one creates electric energy, when one has to store it in batteries, when one has to travel them around - a lot of loss in each step, instead on a single loss burning gasoline. Such stupidity survives only based on state support. It is, of course, very good for mankind in the long range if one can get rid of the much too big dependence on oil. But this in no way means that oil producers become poor guys. And you fantasies that Russia has changed nothing remains propaganda nonsense. It exports now grains, weapons, atomic power, even software, and has also shifted toward selling oil products instead of oil itself. Saudi Arabia seems in much bigger financial trouble.

The United States had a positive balance of trade too, just before it fell into The Great Depression. A positive balance of trade is no protection from inflation...oops. :)
The point being? A positive trade balance means the land, as a whole, gains from foreign trade, gets more money from export than it has to pay for imports. If the price for the main export product falls a lot, one would expect that this changes. It hasn't.
And Russia's foreign currency reserves have been used for than paying down debts. It has been used to prop up the ruble.
A little bit, when it was very much down. Later, during the last year, there was even a time when they have sold rubles. What one has to do to make profit - to buy rubles when they are very cheap, to sell them when they are worth more.

The reserves have been reduced, by 27,1%, to \$371,3 billion. But similarly the things one has to care about have been reduced too, and even more. One criterion for sufficiency of reserves is if they are sufficient for 3 months of import. This criterion has been reduced by 33,6% to \$78,0 bill. Another one is the amount of foreign debt which has to be paid next year. Reduced by 42,8%, to \$134,1 bill. http://aftershock.news/?q=node/368568 for the numbers.

Russia's economy has contracted by 5% or more and it has double digit inflation and people on the street protesting because they are not getting paid. :)
Nice to see that it makes you happy if some people are not getting paid. So, don't worry, you will always have a good chance to become happy, because it always happens that some people do not get paid because their firms have problems and go bankrupt, and the Western press will always find them, once one can make propaganda with this. Of course, if there is some crisis, there will be even more such cases. So, nice times for you. If the big world crisis comes, it will hit Russia too, even if it is prepared quite nicely for this, because it depends now much less on the rest of the world than two years ago.
 
The poor Russians. Double digit Inflation is a terrible thing, especially for those with savings living on fixed incomes.
Sad, really, thinking of poor cold and hungry old people. The savings dissipate like paper in the wind.
It may be terrible if it is something new, but the inflation has always be greater than in the West, and the Russians have known from Jeltsin time that it is not a good idea to make savings in money.

Hunger and cold was a problem during the Jeltsin time - when everything was fine and the West was happy with what happens in Russia, and the guy who is preferred by the West for Russia's future, mafia-boss Chodorkowski, was a big player. Nobody in Russia, except some criminal elements who have made a lot of money at that time but are now imprisoned or so, or those who miss the child prostitution with street kids which was common at that time, would like to return to this time.

And that's why those who support the West have no chance to win. And if the situation becomes worse, because of the political actions of the West like sanctions, or because of something external like falling oil prices, this is, of course, not nice, but will never lead to support for Western anti-Putin propaganda.

The West has to blame himself - he has done everything wrong, done everything to become hated by the Russians, to make Russia their enemy.
 
So vodka is actually an American invention?
That is unrelated. Ok, one could try to make a point that there is some relation: During the time the Russians have loved America they have drunken much more vodka, and the most pro-American president was most famous for drinking a lot of it. And during the Soviet time, with communism/marxism not being an American, but at least a Western invention, the problem has increased too. But beyond such weak connections?

Fact is that everybody could see that China has managed the economic transition toward capitalism in a much better way, less problematic for the population. Instead, following the Western recommendations ended in an economic disaster. Then came the political failures - initiating civil war in Jugoslavia and when, even worse, the open aggression against Serbia to occupy the Kosovo. That made it clear for everybody that the NWO is not a peaceful liberal utopia, but American dictatorship. And the extension of the NATO instead of ending it after the end of the Warsaw pact made clear that all this is directed against Russia. The Russians have understood.

In Syria there seems nothing new, the rebel offensive in Northern Hama has ended without any progress, the Syrian army has taken some village at another part of Northern Hama, increasing the security range around the road to Aleppo. Another counteroffensive directed toward Sheikh Miskeen by Al Qaida has failed too, without even reaching some initial gains. Business as usual, so to say.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top