What is the 6th Dimension?
- Thread starter Xeno
- Start date
- Status
Potatoscrub
Registered Member
tl;dr
Anyway, I hope my previous message wasn't offensive to you
I was merely voicing my (scientifically backed) opinion that spinning a colorful paper wheel does not unlock the secrets of dimensions, but merely causes disorentation and minute hallucenogenic effects.
Oh and expect me to abide by rule 34 of the internet with regard to wheel.
Can you? Isn't the Riemann tensor always zero in one dimension.
@Jozen-Bo
you are a genius with dense ideas and super ego, many thanks for a certain enlightenment. although a shame about your arrogance, as it interferes with the ebb and flow of this forum. publish your journals to satisfy your 1 way plot, but thanks for the drama and tangents.
you are a genius with dense ideas and super ego, many thanks for a certain enlightenment. although a shame about your arrogance, as it interferes with the ebb and flow of this forum. publish your journals to satisfy your 1 way plot, but thanks for the drama and tangents.
dimensional thought
Mabey I'm in the wrong place for this, but as I was setting here drinking my morning coffee, I started thinking of thought being a dimensional device. That is we see in three dimensions there for we think in three dimensions. We watch TV we see two dimensions, which brings up 2 questions: 1. Do we translate the 2 dimensional images we see into 3 dimensions? or 2. Do we merely accept the 2 we see and go on from there. But this isn't the point of my post.
It has been said that insane people are not aware that they are insane. Which begs the question; if we are aware of more dimensions than 3, is it possible to think in 4, 5, or 6 dimensions, and if this were true would we be able to overcome our 3 dimensional insanity, or are the insane actually thinking in more than 3 dinension?
I believe, that as sentient beings, if we imagine it we can make it happen.
Mabey I'm in the wrong place for this, but as I was setting here drinking my morning coffee, I started thinking of thought being a dimensional device. That is we see in three dimensions there for we think in three dimensions. We watch TV we see two dimensions, which brings up 2 questions: 1. Do we translate the 2 dimensional images we see into 3 dimensions? or 2. Do we merely accept the 2 we see and go on from there. But this isn't the point of my post.
It has been said that insane people are not aware that they are insane. Which begs the question; if we are aware of more dimensions than 3, is it possible to think in 4, 5, or 6 dimensions, and if this were true would we be able to overcome our 3 dimensional insanity, or are the insane actually thinking in more than 3 dinension?
I believe, that as sentient beings, if we imagine it we can make it happen.
What makes you think thought has a dimensionality?
We can think in as many dimensions as required: for example as a design engineer (draughtsman) I was often required to think in 2 dimensions (in the old days of doing drawings on paper*), mathematicians can think in four, five or more depending on what they're doing.
And don't forget we experience at least 4 dimensions - time being the other: next week I'll visit X, tomorrow I need to go shopping, last year I had a great holiday...
* I have come to the conclusion (unsupported by any study) that draughtsmen have a facility (maybe through training, or maybe a natural predilection enhanced through training) for "switching" to 2 dimensions. Non-draughtsmen always seem to screw up somewhere in converting a 3D object to an accurate/ representative 2D drawing.
We can think in as many dimensions as required: for example as a design engineer (draughtsman) I was often required to think in 2 dimensions (in the old days of doing drawings on paper*), mathematicians can think in four, five or more depending on what they're doing.
And don't forget we experience at least 4 dimensions - time being the other: next week I'll visit X, tomorrow I need to go shopping, last year I had a great holiday...
* I have come to the conclusion (unsupported by any study) that draughtsmen have a facility (maybe through training, or maybe a natural predilection enhanced through training) for "switching" to 2 dimensions. Non-draughtsmen always seem to screw up somewhere in converting a 3D object to an accurate/ representative 2D drawing.
0=nothing
1=length
2=width
3=depth
4=time
5=space
6=microelectric universes
7=the surface beween wave and particle
8=particle fill
9=probabality, possibílity, chaos
10=thoughts
11=gravity
12=consciousness
13=infinity, everything
actually the 4th is breadth , because with out breadth neither of the first 5 could exist
and time is not a true dimension , since time is a consequence of physical compartive movement by objects , expressed by mathematics
Actually "breadth" is interchangeable with "width".
And no, it's not true that "without breadth neither of the first 5 could exist".
Wrong.
Let me guess.
You majored in ignorance and wishful thinking...
actually it is true that without breadth or width none of the first 5 could exist
since none can move out into space on there own properties , without any breadth
breadth is not conducive with first 5 , the dimensions give a certain specific direction and none include a Natural breadth within them
My apologies, I should have also put "lousy at guessing" on that list.
oh well
I noticed , moving on , that you have no arguments against what I have said in my post
breadth is needed for any for the first 3 dimensions to manifest
and time is only a mathematical dimension , used to understand the physical dynamics of things
look at a atomic clock based on cesium
time calculates the movement of the atoms position(s) , only
Then you also can't read.
No it isn't.
Breadth IS width.
That list is total nonsense.
It might as well include "wind" and "rain" for all the "accuracy" it has.
No it isn't.
Also wrong: time is interval separating events in the same way that space is interval separating objects (or locations).
It's a linguistic difference only.
Wrong, as Ben stated in another thread.
- Status