The justification for Christ and the salvation concept depend entirely on man's fall from grace begun by A&E. If the A&E story is not literally true then Christianity has no basis.Since it was a myth what does it matter? Also, even in the myth there was no apple.
Cris said:Mormonism as we see here is largely and heavily based on A&E being literally true.
The First Presidency has given the following statement regarding further official elaboration on the Garden story:
".....it is deemed wisest to let that subject remain without further explanation, for it is written that we are to receive 'line upon line,' according to our faith and capacities, and the circumstances attending our progress." (Messages of the First Presidency, Vol.2, p.233 - p.234)
I’m not sure that I would, but if I was just limited to the garden only for eternity then there is only so many times I could do something an infinite number of times in one place before it became really repetitive, right?You imagine that it would become boring after a time, but why?
Possibly because the bible gives no indication of anything else other than a garden paradise. Even descriptions of heaven, presumably our goal and greatest prize, is not clearly defined anywhere – it is left to our imagination. But why would there be any progression? If everything is provided, presumably God would discreetly clear away any excess excrement, all food would be provided in abundance, life would be eternal, and there would be no disease and no fear of death, and no struggle for survival – what then would be the purpose of doing anything?Man's stewardship over the earth might have progressed differently without sin, but why do you assume it wouldn't have progressed at all?
What was man created to do?And because he was doing exactly what he was created to do, in the spirit it was meant to be done, he would have been content and fulfilled.
But there would be no death and if we were to do as God commands and continue to multiply then the Earth would become wall-to-wall people in about 38 generations, or about 1 trillion people, and continuing to grow at an exponential rate.And lastly, that overpopulation would have become a problem in paradise is far from certain. ………….
And that is good because? And, doing what?Finally, we have to consider that without sin, people would have lived in direct relationship with God. They would never be without hope or recourse.
Unlike the command to multiply in Eden it is not clear if people in heaven are meant to have sex.And would heaven ever become overpopulated?
That is somewhat like asking; "If I wasn't born how would the world be different?" Tough to answer such questions as there are so many possibilities including "me" just being born later - speculation reigns in these cases.Cris said:What if A & E had not eaten the forbidden fruit and had stayed in the Garden of Eden, how would the world have developed?
I can't see where this is headed; the lack of current techonology is only to be expected from a primitive setting.The garden appears to have been a "friendly" jungle where animals can be slaughtered easily for food and fruit was in abundance. What else were people meant to do? Sex I guess would have been the primary pastime since there was no TV, radio, internet, cars, sports, etc. I didn't see any references to buildings, sewerage systems, phone systems, etc., either.
Not necessarily. They may have developed other forms of entertainment - why not? One may wonder though, because the sexual form of entertainment present in this our continually advancing technological society is arguably the most popular. When one approaches Christianity with a soley literal or soley symbolic view he will surely not address a significant portion of Christendom with his arguments.Wouldn't a garden paradise without modern facilities have become rather boring and inconvenient after a short while? And since we wouldn't die and would have lots of sex then what was God's plan for solving inevitable overpopulation?
No one can say for sure but one can always speculate. Eternal existence in this form perhaps?Just what had God planned for us in the event we hadn't disobeyed him?
While the events in the Garden of Eden, as related in the scriptures, did occur, Church leaders have taught that most parts of the Garden story are allegorical and should not be taken literally.
Cris said:So which is it? The events did occur or they didn't?
Speculation reigns. For one who is "In Search of Immortality" you appear to have a lot of qualms about the whole subject. Your descriptions above may lead one to think that if we didn't "eat the fruit" then we'd have many more problems to solve and would be way further advanced in technology than we are today. After all, that's what drives techonological developments - the need to work around issues.Cris said:I’m not sure that I would, but if I was just limited to the garden only for eternity then there is only so many times I could do something an infinite number of times in one place before it became really repetitive, right?
...
But there would be no death and if we were to do as God commands and continue to multiply then the Earth would become wall-to-wall people in about 38 generations, or about 1 trillion people, and continuing to grow at an exponential rate.
In real practical terms most would need to leave the planet and expand into the rest of the galaxy and beyond which would become full eventually given eternal lifetimes. The bible doesn’t appear to mention space travel.
That raises another question – if we cannot die then would we need to breathe? Presumably God would provide adequate spacecraft which would never fail and he would provide suitable new Earthlike worlds for us to fill.
LOL, well probably not. I somehow doubt that whether you lived or not would effect world events in such a dramatic manner as is claimed by the fall of A&E.That is somewhat like asking; "If I wasn't born how would the world be different?"