No more than the racist ideas of evolution would be valid in 2000 yearsSo FSM would be a valid religion 2000 years from now?
I guess the big one is that it is only seriously advocated by atheists for the sake of parody@LG --
What's the big difference? Where does the FSM fail any more than current religions?
things would certainly look strange ... much like if it was to change that racist ideas of evolution come to the fore@LG --
And if that were to change?
Not too expert in scientology but I would say off the cuff that scientology doesn't really have anything to say about the ultimate nature of existence ( the role of the living entity, the role of the phenomenal world, the role of god .... and the interaction of all these three.) It seems that scientology is mostly about psychic phenomena ... kind of like "how to win friends and influence people" mixed in with reincarnation.However a better question would be this, what marked differences are there between scientology and christianity? How do they differ in the fundamentals?
IOW it doesn't really identify the inherent problems of material existence.
IOW, just like the racist is departing from their views of evolution to present what they "really" think is the "real"picture of race issues in the context of parody , the atheist is departing from their views of the universe/historical continuum's to present what they "really" think is the "real" picture of theistic issues in the context parody
try reading a newspaperlightgigantic
What inherent problems? I think you are seeing problems that just do not exist.
seriously advocated by atheists for the sake of parody
did you miss the word "advocated"?Seriously for parody? Will someone tell LG what parody means?
Seriously for parody? Will someone tell LG what parody means?
The technical name of this condition is called "Disagreeing with what Grumpy thinks is true". Apparently his wife has the same condition.AlexG
LG has a condition that doesn't allow any evidence or understanding of anything to enter into his mind that contradicts what he already thinks. It's called magical thinking.
Grumpy
Apparently his wife has the same condition.
Yet you declare its an imagination to say material existence has inherent problemslightgigantic
My wife is dead, ahole.
Grumpy
Yet you declare its an imagination to say material existence has inherent problems
so you had no problems when your wife died?lightgigantic
Death is not a problem for life,
and having children never causes anyone any problems?it is an end to it, just like a birth is a beginning.
hence inherent problems of the material world = no get out of jail free cards.There is no evidence of anything else. Your desires notwithstanding. You are born, you get old, you get sick and then you die and the world goes on without you. There are no get out of jail free cards, sorry.
Grumpy
so you had no problems when your wife died?
and having children never causes anyone any problems?
hence inherent problems of the material world = no get out of jail free cards.
You seem to be agreeing with this fact.
problems don't have to be metaphysical to existlightgigantic
Not of the metaphysical kind.
If problems were not a part of living there would be no need to find solutions or suffer in the absence of themGrief is also part of living, not a problem for it.
Problems are not rendered non-existent simply because everyone experiences ... in fact the statement "inherent problems of material existence " indicates that it would be expected that everyone experience themNone that are not natural and experienced by most mammals. Even dying in childbirth is a part of living.
Actually at the moment we are discussing whether there are inherent problems of (material) existence ... since you can't really move a discussion from "problems do not exist" to the likelihood of solutions for them.You seem to think there is a get out of jail free card, a second chance, a life outside of living. You are delusional. You were born, you are getting older, you will likely get sick and you will die. Get used to the idea and deal with it, or continue down the path toward unreason and delusion. I don't care, either way.
Grumpy
So far you seem to indicate that if everyone experiences it
it is not a problem.
Would this be correct?
@wynn --
In what important way do the parodies depart from the "standard" view on religion? Keep in mind that in our world the "standard" view would be the majority view, and that would mean christianity(specifically catholicism).