It makes perfect sense, and isn't even complicated.
No, it doesn't... that jumbled mess of a sentence has absolutely no meaning that I can divine... if you have a point, then make it. Otherwise, let those with a point continue unhindered.
It will do absolutely nothing, because all Victor's systems are closed systems.
Nothing that Victor has invented will work because it contravenes Newton's Third Law.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object. The direction of the force on the first object is opposite to the direction of the force on the second object. Forces always come in pairs - equal and opposite action-reaction force pairs.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/u2l4a.cfm
This invention is a kind of perpetual motion machine.
Energy is supposedly removed from the system, but the original energy remains in full.
You could take some of the energy from the turbine to power the fans, and they would run forever producing free electricity.
In short, it is ideal material for the pseudoscience section.
It is truly Democratic that Victor has a place to speak, not undisputed of course, but unhindered.
Well, no - that one could create a force despite being a closed system - two jets causing a cylinder to rotate, attached to a generator, would indeed create power. It wouldn't be terribly efficient, but it would have the potential for SOME workload. however, trying to power those jets via that generator (not sure how an electric jet would work? Ion system maybe? Not enough thrust) would still suffer the effects of resistance and friction, thus eventually reducing the system to a net zero work potential.