Victor Espinoza's: Thread of Intrigue

[Kittamaru]

Of course you can, what is nearer to you from a point, a cave, or a dome? The dome is nearer than the cave, so in terms of location you can't have the cave positive, and the dome negative. Negative numbers attract, so science has a positive mass electron, it throws out Quantum physics. Science has no attracting mass. Science treats the electron as a sphere, but it is a hole. It is full of gravity... which makes it spherical. Without the negative number, how would you know that the electron is full of gravity?

The reference of a point, a cave, and a dome makes no sense either! It almost sounds like you are confusing math (negative numbers) and a vacuum (void).

And how are electrons "full of gravity"? Are you talking about nuclear forces now? Atomic bonds? You are jumping everywhere...

 

[Kittamaru]

I want to create thrust.

Using air.

I want to invent a space propellant.

The problem with that is that you need movement outside of a closed system to do this. Otherwise the force is cancelled by it's opposite reaction.

Now, you could do an inertial disk system (think of it like a gyroscopic control disk), but this only applies along an axis of ration, not a vector of thrust.

 

[victorespinoza]

The problem with that is that you need movement outside of a closed system to do this. Otherwise the force is cancelled by it's opposite reaction.

Now, you could do an inertial disk system (think of it like a gyroscopic control disk), but this only applies along an axis of ration, not a vector of thrust.

With centrifugal force, I remove the opposite reaction.

 

[Uncle Pythagoras]

The reference of a point, a cave, and a dome makes no sense either! It almost sounds like you are confusing math (negative numbers) and a vacuum (void).

And how are electrons "full of gravity"? Are you talking about nuclear forces now? Atomic bonds? You are jumping everywhere...

Hmm I use shapes for maths, because I am trying to talk about pure physics without numbers. It's probably hard to follow. Nevermind.

 

[billvon]

With centrifugal force, I remove the opposite reaction.

Victor has rediscovered the Dean Drive!

 

[Uncle Pythagoras]

With centrifugal force, I remove the opposite reaction.

I don't understand your fishing idea. I that a lasso?

 

[victorespinoza]

I don't understand your fishing idea. I that a lasso?

I'm not fishing, I'm creating a centrifugal force to one (1) electric aircraft turbine.

 

[Uncle Pythagoras]

I'm not fishing, I'm creating a centrifugal force to one (1) electric aircraft turbine.

Is that like a helicopter with jets instead of rotor blades?

 

[victorespinoza]

Is that like a helicopter with jets instead of rotor blades?

Not so:

I want to create thrust.

Using air.

I want to invent a space propellant.

With centrifugal force, I remove the opposite reaction.

[video=youtube;XnSZ93ervoo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnSZ93ervoo&hd=1[/video]

 

[Kittamaru]

Victor, the problem is, that wouldn't create any thrust along it's axis... all you would have is rotation and counter rotation.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

I'm not fishing, I'm creating a centrifugal force to one (1) electric aircraft turbine.

It was you that started talking about fishing.

You said:
"It's like when we go fishing, the turbine blows
while the centrifugal force will not leave the turbine will fall to the ground"?

Now, if you had said:
"It's like when we go fishing. You sit by the riverbank and put bait on the hook"
that would have made some sense.

What are you talking about?

 

[Kittamaru]

What do you mean by "It's like when we go fishing"
How is it like going fishing?

I get it... I think he's thinking of how, in fly fishing, you swing the line back and forth in order to build up momentum to cast the line.

Victor, that wont' work here without some method of releasing the weight forward and then drawing yourself towards in... the problem is, in space, trying to cast the weight would have different results depending on if the weight you are casting is lighter or heavier than your ship: If heavier, you'll simply push your ship backwards, if lighter, you'll just drag the weight back to yourself. Yes, you'll move a little bit, but the net result would be near-zero in the end.

 

[victorespinoza]

Victor, the problem is, that wouldn't create any thrust along it's axis... all you would have is rotation and counter rotation.

The air pushes.

 

[origin]

I get it... I think he's...

Don't kid yourself.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

It's certainly not going to be anything as sensible as that.

 

[victorespinoza]

It was you that started talking about fishing.

You said:
"It's like when we go fishing, the turbine blows
while the centrifugal force will not leave the turbine will fall to the ground"?

Now, if you had said:
"It's like when we go fishing. You sit by the riverbank and put bait on the hook"
that would have made some sense.

What are you talking about?

I try to say, that while these rotating a turbine of Air for aircraft, there is no opposite reaction force downward..

 

[Captain Kremmen]

:bawl:
But what has that got to do with fishing?

 

[victorespinoza]

:bawl:
But what has that got to do with fishing?

It is a diagram that I saw on the internet explaining centrifugal force:

It has nothing to do with fishing.

 

[Uncle Pythagoras]

I try to say, that while these rotating a turbine of Air for aircraft, there is no opposite reaction force downward..

That still sounds like a helicopter with jet engines to me. Are the engines turned on, or off?

 

[Uncle Pythagoras]

Double post anomaly.