Naah, they would have started killing everyone, so that everyone runs away from the danger tsunami zone.(Q) said:Would the UFO's be sporting a flashing billboard similar to the Goodyear blimp?
Duendy is using magical to describe the way in which our ancient ancestors made sense of the world. As our cultures evolved the twin strands of the subjective and objective, spiritual and physical, separated into religion and science. Duendy appears to be arguing for a reunification of sorts.(Q) said:Magic? Slight-of-hand, smoke-and-mirrors are all that encompasses magic. Have you never been to Las Vegas?
But a bolide strike in the Baltic would be bad news.Avatar said:Anyways, there are no worth bothering about earthquakes where I live.
Ophiolite said:I'm not saying alternative views should not be discussed. Start a thread on this in the philosophy section: call it science and religion - two sides of one coin.. You may be surprised how close some of our views are.
D__OK. i might
You say science+state= SCIENCEism.
You accuse me of SCIENCEism
I have a science background an am arguing the science case, so half of your definition.
I have as little as possible to do with the state.
D__Well sos do i...BUT it still is up your arse, and the more 'professional' the more you so, regarding freedom of free scientific endeavour
Therefore, either your definition or your accusation are faulty..
D__ apparently not so
also, THIs forum is called 'pseudoscience' hadn't you noticed?
Yes. That is exactly where I would have attacked my post. It was its single glaring weakness.
Avatar said:What is 'mental health myth'?
(Q) said:There MIGHt BE a way of experiencing lightening that is not from a scientific textbook----of experiencing wind, water, and so on. a magical way. and it is that way that this age of science has lost, and stamps down on whenever mentioned...
Magic? Slight-of-hand, smoke-and-mirrors are all that encompasses magic. Have you never been to Las Vegas?
(Q) said:There MIGHt BE a way of experiencing lightening that is not from a scientific textbook----of experiencing wind, water, and so on. a magical way. and it is that way that this age of science has lost, and stamps down on whenever mentioned...
Magic? Slight-of-hand, smoke-and-mirrors are all that encompasses magic. Have you never been to Las Vegas?
(Q) said:but what they LACK is any spiritual sensitivity. ist is that i am pointing to
Perhaps the reasoning behind lacking spiritual sensitivity is due in part to the lack of the spiritual, which to date has never been shown to exist.
D__ Let me guess. Evidence?
"Pointing" to the spiritual is pointing where?
duendy said:HI...I found this today:
India Daily - an enormous number of UFO sightings before Tsunami
www.indiadaily.com/editorial/12-31h-04.asp
This really makes you wonder....THAt if we would just be more openminded about all this, then we would be able to SEE signs about disasters like Tsunami.
another natrual sign before it was may many sand snakes coming out of the ground as in response to earth tremor
If what I have argued is correct, it appears, not necessarily that Chalmers is mistaken, but that if he is correct, neither he nor we are in any position to know or reasonably conclude that he is. A stripped-down version of his argument can be put this way:
1.There are phenomenal experiences.
2. Phenomenal experiences are not logically supervenient upon the physical.
3. If anything actual is not logically supervenient upon the physical, then physicalism is false.
Therefore, physicalism is false.
That is certainly valid. It may also be sound. I have said nothing to directly argue that any of the premises are false. However, if it is sound, I have argued, we do not know and, to all appearances, cannot know that it is. Therefore, unless something (consistent with Chalmers’ other central claims) can be done to shore up the claim that we can know or be justified in believing that we have phenomenal experience, it is not rationally incumbent upon us to reject physicalism even if Chalmers’ argument is sound.
http://personal.bgsu.edu/~roberth/chalmers.html
(Q) said:(Q)....??? have you got any fingers?
Actually no, I'm an alien on a mission to Earth - my entire existence is comprised of a head in a jar. I type using a pencil in what Earthlings would consider my mouth.
D__i didn't realize. is there anything i can do?
but it also is feeling? like when you are sad that area feels heavy. when you are anxious heart beats faster....in love..?
Are you refering to the release of adrenaline and other neurotransmitters?
D__ Yes and more. the other doesn't cancel that out, it is just a deeper dimension of relational experience rather than mere logical reductive analytical analysis
use your imagination and feeling rather than just your logical capacity, and you'll beigin diggin where i'm comin from.
I kinda figured out from your first posts that your entire concept of reality stems from your imagination. Thanks, but no thanks. I prefer reality. Yoiur imagination can easily refute anything anyone has to say and would be valid... in your imagination.