Only?
That's already a great thing!
They are reveiling those documents that UFOs exist!
You are talking like that just because it proves you completly wrong...
I was on the surface radar plot one night and saw an intermittent contact several milse away, couldn't get a firm signal on it. The officer of the watch was passing by and I said "Look, Sir, a UFO." He said "No, that would have to be Flying." I said "No, an Unidentified Floating Object." Silly.
Once on the quarterdeck a petti officer asked us how many roses were on board. After some harrumphing from everyone he said "Only two types. The compass roses on the charts and the shower roses." I said "NO, PO, there's another one." He looked like he was expecting me to be a smart-arse, said "Well, what is it then?" I said "Fire 'ose." See, I thought it was really simple and dumb. But he cracked up laughing for a good few minutes.
Really?
wow! you"re Dana Scully from FBI ist it?
yet i fail to understand why the British and American intelligence failed to identify about 20% of the sightings
Is there some reason why the reports from the first link are negative images? It makes them hard to read. Is there any easy way to view the positive images instead?
I think the only evidence that can come close to looking for anamolies will be the radar images that calculates a large object travelling at supersonic speed and it does not belong to us, russians or chinese....
Radar Capturing of a UFO?
Yes,indeed and many.
one of them was in Belgium which gained world wide attention.the object tracked on RADAR defied all the charracterstics of a conventional aircraft,it was Triangular shaped UFO.the example (official press release) states that the object accelerated to such high speeds that would be impossible for Humans to tolerate.
BTW i have video too and RADAR capturing is also shown.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.