Actually, I am under the impression that this is common. As admitted, yes.. I do have strange, illogically formatted dreams as well, but consider it quite normal to have logically formatted dreams.
On the surface it wouldn't seem likely that the victim of a horrendous accident would be in a 'relaxed state' but it's worth perhaps looking deeper. Some guy barely conscious, a lot of blood lost - a dropped temperature. Ultimately I would consider that as 'relaxed' as one can get. Funnily enough people in such a position are generally encouraged to 'not go to sleep' etc because they'll most likely die. The unrelaxed people, (those screaming/aware of their surroundings etc), are usually the ones that survive.
I meant after the experience, not during it.
Who does that? Even the most skeptical of people still shit themselves when in a 'haunted house' and will often yell "ghost" even when they know it's bullshit. If such a thing happened to me I might possibly yell the same thing. Looking back at the event I can then deduce that it was my mind playing tricks etc. I am at that stage quite unlikely to phone the papers about it. "Is this the Daily Mirror? Yeah hi, I thought I saw a ghost last month but now I think about it it was bullshit".
Using how many cases out of how many cases? I do know that if I ever have an nde and retain my sense of reasoning then I wouldn't consider it some vision of a future life or whatever. I also wouldn't phone the newspapers just to tell them all nde's are bullshit. Who would?
Typically the tools will be covered, yes. Dentists however never do that.. bastards
Just to remain accurate: At the time the nurse made the comment she was alive and no blood had been drained - because, as the nurse said, her veins were a problem.
Secondly, (from the wiki page): Ear plugs do not block all external sounds. People with ear plugs may still be able to hear sounds in their environment.
The third part is the anaesthetic. To suggest that the anaesthetic wasn't functioning perfectly is certainly a more logical step than to suggest some ghostly part of her was clinging to the ceiling.
You seem to regard that as entirely illogical while what.. advocating that a ghostly part of her was floating round the room?
There are a couple of reason of which that is the most pertinent - of course you could also look at old memory resurfacing because of knowledge about the procedure. It is standard for doctors to explain big procedures to the patient before they undergo them. It will entail something like: "first we use a [insert tool name here] to open up a piece of the skull....". This woman would therefore most likely be aware of what procedures would happen and when and the tools used to carry them out.
You would need to establish that the dream occurred during death.
I wouldn't say "hid" as much as not aware of it. When you conduct procedures day in day out you're unlikely to remember such trivial details - especially when working under the premise that the patient wont remember anything.
Well to be honest I'd prefer to look at these possibilities before asserting that the womans ghost was clinging to the ceiling and then went off to have lunch with uncle Bob who's also dead but now lives in the clouds.
