Skin Walker will enter soon and have a shot, parade around,
Just so I don't disappoint you... here I am
Skin Walker, seems to have a sizable investments in it not being true, so guess what? spends his life proving it is not true, I bet his whole academic life/ego depends on it not being true, I bet when he gets a good argument he sits at his computer with his heart racing , trying to get another angle, and then when he finally gets it off his chest, he sits back and marvels, then goes to bed, then gets up the next day and eagerly checks to see if there has been a response, and Even if you win the battle here, you manage to tie the other in a not, it changes nothing, zero.
It`s all about you!
Yes.. I'm sure you're right. I exist only to debunk nonsense like the T-boob profits. I have no other life and do nothing between your four contributions to the woo-woo claims made in this thread.
Your fallacious attempts to poison the well are typical tactics of the woo-woo crowd with just about everything from religious cult claims to UFOs to ESP. Even the alternative medicine nutters use the same tactic when they can't engage in reasoned debate with critics. Their response is nearly always the same when they find that they've finally lost the ability to argue their points with reason (after all, reason isn't on their side): they say things like, "the skeptics are obsessed with [insert BS claim], therefore there must be something to [insert BS claim]."
Instead of dealing with the argument at hand, they create this straw man, making the skeptics' arguments into something they're not and use fallacious tactics like poisoning the well with comments like, "he'll probably respond right away with...."
The fascinating thing is that on this forum, there exist one or two topics attract nutters that will only discuss this topic and no other. These one-thread wonders pop in, make generalist claims of wild speculation, cry foul when skeptics bring up reasoned arguments, and use fallacious arguments to support their woo-woo cause. All the while, they NEVER post in any other forum on any other topic. If they do, it is rare and probably just a token post to give the impression that they are participating -but their real agenda is clear: their woo-woo cause.
So, Mr. Four Post Wonder, while you are free to come here and express your opinion, anyone that is actually a member of SciForums knows that you're talking out of your ass with regard to ad hominem claims made in your post above about my "investments" in the T-boob profits.
You succeeded in one thing with that post: creating a single post that contained at least 3, maybe 4, distinct logical fallacies. Congratulations.
Now, since none of the T-boobs seem able to logically support their claims with reason and evidence, isn't it safe to conclude that Desmarquet is a fiction writer. And since his fiction has barely a following among a few cult fantatics and is poorly written, can't we conclude that he is also a bad fiction writer?