No, I just didn't want to go through old posts again,
Right. Nice cop out.
So what we got are:
1) two graves with 2000 year old contents.
2) people who dance and sing around it obviously for 2000 years already, using the same chant which has nothing in common with any known up to today Syllabary of Kana.
3) a document about the graves.
The point is that if 3 is a forgery then 1 & 2 don't make sense and one can not explain 1 & 2.
Please cite the archaeological or historical journals that have dated these alleged graves and rituals. I've yet to see the evidence that there is a grave dated to 2000 years. But even if such graves do exist, then epigraphical forgeries make complete sense for someone who wants to sensationalize them or create undo mystery. Such hoaxes were once common practice at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries.
well if you ask me, then please explain how could someone forge a document as such and seduce people to dance and cite to a meningless chant from that document for more than 2000 years already?
Sure. Its called the Bible. Or Mahabharata. Or the Koran. Such documents are created entirely out of oral traditions that are, in turn, based on mythical explanations of non-existent supernatural entities and events. People to this day "dance" and "chant" about these and many, many other documents, texts, and doctrines forged to explain the universe. Most of them have very different and even contradictory explanations, so clearly they can't all be right. Thus, at best, only one is not a "forgery" making the "dances" and "chants" of those remaining the exact explanation you're asking above. QED.
I said there's no evidence presented in the book, and even more, I said there's no evidence that reincarnation is true.
Good. Topic closed then. We both agree that there's no good reason to believe in reincarnation. I clearly misunderstood you until now, so accept my apologies.
Even in desmarquet's book it is written that information about past lives is erased from the memory of the person and the dragon in desmarquet's cellar is that (as expalined also in his book by the alien Thao) such information can only be accessed through the psychosphere of the planet by any individual who would undertake the necessary special training in extracting that information, details of which are left unexplained.
Complete and utter fantasy. But as long as we both agree on that... Like I said (and like you appear now to admit), Desmarquet's book is fiction. If all we disagree upon is whether its bad or good fiction, then that's a difference that's acceptable. Until now, I thought you were claiming that Desmarquet's book is an account of reality, which is the only reason I've bothered to post in this thread.
I never said nor I ever claimed anything from that book to be fact except than the obvious, such as facts regarding Drugs and Money to be of the greatest evils of our civilization or facts about the russians really having found out a way to photograph the aura using the GDV camera, or fact about the hydrogen engine being the best method around to fight pollution.
Except these aren't facts that are as obvious as you might want to believe. Drugs and money have given much to the world, indeed my wife's life depends on a daily dose of medication that she cannot miss. Ever. Drugs have healed millions and prolonged the lives of millions. Money has made it possible to introduce these drugs to countries that disparately need them to help eradicate diseases like polio, small pox, and to fight life-threatening diseases like cholera, diphtheria, malaria and so on. Prenatal drugs have helped protect the health of mothers and their newborns, improving infant mortality rates in peripheral nations for the better. And
money has allowed this to happen. Money has also allowed workers and relief personnel to help victims of crises like the 2004 tsunami and earthquake victims in Iran. Money allows those interested to gain quality educations in institutions that were endowed by philanthropists or funded by governments. And so on.
So, clearly, drugs and money aren't the greatest evils since they've so clearly been used for good. Its what
people choose to do with these technologies that makes them good or bad.
With regard to photographing "auras," this is complete and utter pseudoscience and has been demonstrated as such. The "auras" are nothing more than electric discharges in the film itself. They aren't present if high voltage electricity isn't applied to the plate that the object is sitting on along with the film. Its bunk and only the most credulous buy into it. But if you'd like to cite scientific sources for "auras," be my guest. I'm willing to revise my opinion with evidence.
Finally, the "fact" that the hydrogen engine is the best method to fight pollution is questionable. Where do you suppose the hydrogen will come from? It takes electricity to make hydrogen ... surely you're aware of this. Granted, it could be produced using clean nuclear energy or hydrothermal energy -perhaps even wind or wave energy- but these processes aren't in place. And if the hydrogen engine suddenly became popular in American vehicles, you can almost bet that the method for producing hydrogen will be through burning coal since it is so plentiful and cheap. This would make its overall "pollution fighting" ability somewhat dubious at best.
You see I'm careful about what I take as facts.
Yes. We can see that.
Therefore what 'you' take as "fact" with the help of your own imagination and understanding is your responsibility, and what "evidence" you bring to either prove or disprove what 'you' have taken as fact is also your responsibility.
Indeed. Lucky me I have an education and critical thinking skills to guide me into what I "take as 'fact'" so that I don't succumb to the same pitfalls you appear to.
and yes, I am a moderator of the goldenplanetforum where practicing cults of any form is banned and incoherent nonsense like the posts you make here Mr.Skinwalker are moderated by the likes of me.
Lucky you that I'm a much fairer moderator here than you are there, eh? Otherwise I would have moderated your complete and utter nonsense long ago. Clearly you seek to ban the practicing of any cults other than your own at that woo-woo forum. The cult of the Thiaboobs. Present company excluded from that ad hominem remark, of course.
No other post from me will ever follow on this forum again, I'm so sorry to say you truly made me sick of the whole idea.
Don't let the door hit ya, pal.