Um, no.
(Rest) Mass is zero.
Um, no.
There is no aether.
Um, no.
That's specious nonsense.
How can it be outside the aether while it's in the aether?
The Universe has no beginning, and No End.
- Thread starter Pincho Paxton
- Start date
(Rest) Mass is zero.
There is no aether.
That's specious nonsense.
How can it be outside the aether while it's in the aether?
Well it's not in the spherical force, it's in the linear force (or tension force). Two bubbles touching, inside is spherical force, between the bubbles is linear force. That must be what mass is.. spherical force. Linear force can be a vibration. No movement, no vibration.
Word salad.
You still failed on how all started .
Things do not start from zero and become billions of pounds around .
Not in any logic .
I did well. Imagine a Newton's Cradle with electrons appearing in the middle on each swing.
Not in any logic?
How about physics?
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=92761
Again...
Read the thread before making such comments.
No you didn't.
You simply posted specious drivel that doesn't even hang together as drivel, let alone as science with evidentiary support.
And of course the electrons do not surface from nothing.....:shrug:.
You fail to even grasp gravity or what isotropic means.
A large object with plenty of mass exerts gravitational forces on other objects. The force is determined by the mass of the two objects and the distance between them. A satellite 1000km above the North pole feels the same gravity as a satellite 1000km below the South pole. That's why gravitational systems collapse to make spherical systems, their gravity pulls on all objects at a set distance equally.
The gravitational force expression in Newtonian physics is $$F = \frac{GMm}{r^{2}}$$. 2 satellites which are 1,000,000 miles from the Sun will each feel the same force of gravity. It doesn't matter whether they are next to one another or on opposite sides of the Sun or one doing a polar orbit while another does an equatorial one. Gravity treats all directions equally and hence if its strong enough it pulls objects into spherical shapes.
I teach basic mechanics to people doing geophysics and even they manage to grasp this. Why can't you?
So the universe is similar to every thread you start they have no beginning and seem to have no end.
Newtonian physics are useless on mass scale of the universe. We are even past Einstein physics of relativity, past the point of frame dragging effect, we are past all that...
link: http://einstein.stanford.edu/
you know what, I hereby propose a hypothesis that the whole universe will collapse as a result of a frame dragging effect. But yes, its a hypothesis.
link: http://einstein.stanford.edu/
you know what, I hereby propose a hypothesis that the whole universe will collapse as a result of a frame dragging effect. But yes, its a hypothesis.
A mix of supposition and nonsense.
No it isn't it's a wild guess based on... nothing so far.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Hypothesis
The closest you get to the meaning is 1).
What's the argument you're going to put forward?
I was talking about Quantum Gravity. The Photon isn't even next to the next atom, it is between up to 4 atoms at a time, sometimes 2. With atom spacing to account for, Gravity between atom spacing cannot exist, else all atoms would be touching one another. The photon is just a wave, so this makes it even more robust to gravity. To bend a Photon path you need to bend the Aether itself. That requires a great force.
Anyway, you keep saying.. "This was taught.", and I keep telling you that Doers are taught, and thinkers think.
Last edited:
Please, get a clue. Or an education.
An education is what has messed you up so that you don't understand the reality any more. It's very simple. A bubble with bubbles within has force. The bubbles membrane has tension. The tension can vibrate, but the force is inside the bubble. The vibration is not a mass, it is a movement. A photon is a movement, and when stationary has no vibration. Thinking that a photon might have mass is like saying that a banana has a radar. Of course zero works, because you are asking an imaginary question. A banana has zero radar.
Last edited:
No, you were just making shit up. You haven't provided any reason why gravity is not isotropic, either on the scale of quantum mechanics or cosmology.
For every atom there's millions or billions of photons. Photons are the most numerous particles in the universe. Turning on a light doesn't create atoms but it does produce trillions upon trillions of photons.
Name one 'thinker' in physics who succeeded by ignoring everything, absolutely everything, known at the time. There isn't one. Imagination untempered by rationality is delusion.
Bearing in mind that nothing you have come up with so far actually explains a damn thing I don't think you're in a position to talk about "messed up" or "reality".
Word salad again. You can't support (let alone prove) any of the above.
Photons don't have mass.
As already stated.
And you're talking bollocks.
And again you used the word gravity as a description. What method are you talking about? Gravitons flying out from atoms? What does that mean?
How do you know that the electrons are not just vibrating the Aether?
None, because success is part of being wrong in physics.