The two state solution fate

Status
Not open for further replies.
Buffalo Roam said:
pjdude, I don't need a sock puppet to deal with you, your so far behind the curve, you think your in first place.
Click to expand...

but I don't think I'm in first place. I just think I'm better and smarter than you. you really need to get your head out of your ass and learn to listen.
 
pjdude1219 said:
Yeah I know your not that fucking smart.
Click to expand...

Oh look ,pj know some grown up words, ain't that cute, he sound like a little grown up man....:roflmao:


pjdude1219 said:
considering what you consider to be intelligent I really would have to ask you to not insult him like that.
Click to expand...

Yes, intellegent enough to nail you correctly:

p-brane said:
You need to recognize the difference between fantasy and reality. You sound like a crazy person. Your posts are shallow and show no real insight into anything.
Click to expand...
 
Buffalo Roam said:
Oh look ,pj know some grown up words, ain't that cute, he sound like a little grown up man....:roflmao:
Click to expand...
grow up and quit using smilies.




Yes, intellegent enough to nail you correctly:
Click to expand...
lol. you haven't nailed me correctly. Your guesses are about my life and reasons for my actions are as far from the truth as possible.



and please refrain form taking credit for someone elses alleged accomplishment.
 
Buffalo Roam said:
Yes, I know you think your are legend in your own mind, and whipped the Big Bad Buffalo.
Click to expand...

there is a word for people like you, who when repeatedly told something and still don't get it. That word is stupid. You don't know shit about me or what I think of anything.
 
pjdude1219 said:
there are jews that would have killed him( like you) there are jews that would have saved him. there are arabs that would have killed him there are arabs that would have saved him.
Click to expand...

The Arabs tired to kill him, they were the ones who attacked him in the first palce and after he ws down, they were ready to put a bullit into his brain.

The Israelis in their actions seem to show that your chances for survival are much better with them even after you shoot at them.
 
The Israelis in their actions seem to show that your chances for survival are much better with them even after you shoot at them.
Click to expand...

Really? Why? Because they kill only 1300 for every 3?
 
Buffalo Roam said:
The Arabs tired to kill him, they were the ones who attacked him in the first palce and after he ws down, they were ready to put a bullit into his brain.

The Israelis in their actions seem to show that your chances for survival are much better with them even after you shoot at them.
Click to expand...

generalizing like that is bigoted. I suppose if I were to use your logic it would mean all rightwingers are stupid because you are.
 
pjdude1219 said:
generalizing like that is bigoted. I suppose if I were to use your logic it would mean all rightwingers are stupid because you are.
Click to expand...

Explain to me who attacked and then tried to kill the man after he was wounded?

Explain the flying lessons given Fatah members in Gaza by Hamas when they staged their coup?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvSMlPaD_Zo


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1M4eH9Kk7I&feature=related

Hamas - Gaza - Palestinians - Fatah - Israel - Khaled Abu Hi...
Jul 15, 2007 ... Throwing handcuffed prisoners to their deaths from Gaza’s highest (and most ... But his journey is Gaza’s journey, from Fatah fighter and Israeli ... ruins of the buildings of the Executive Force, which he helped Hamas build ... At least 160 Palestinians, most of them Fatah, died in that week of war ...

www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/magazine/15HAMAS-t.html - Similar pages
 
disease said:
Explain why Israel has ignored avery resolution passed by the UN except 181?
Click to expand...

Because the Arabs ignored U.N.181 in the begining.

And every call for peace ever since.

Hamas is still ignoring U.N. 181, and U.N.242.

Even in the last exchange, Hamas ignored the U.N.
 
disease said:
Explain why Israel has ignored avery resolution passed by the UN except 181?
Click to expand...

Because Palestine is a lie.

http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/where-is-palestine-638461.html


The reality is that Israel was founded on 17% of historic Palestine in 1948 - not 78% , and captured 5% of historic Palestine in 1967 - not 22%.
Click to expand...

The Committee for Accurate Reporting of the Middle East in America (CAMERA) succinctly summarises this reality as follows:

These are false and deceptive statements based on an incorrect understanding of the size of Palestine and the boundaries that defined Palestine in international law.


"In fact, the original land of Palestine, as determined by the League of Nations, included what is now Israel, Gaza, the West Bank and the entire state of Jordan. The British transferred nearly 78% of historic Palestine to the Arabs to create a new entity called the Emirate of Transjordan. Jews were forbidden to live, buy land or become citizens there."

The Emirate remained part of Palestine until 1946 when independence was granted by Great Britain with the consent of the League of Nations and it was renamed the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan,

That decision in 1946 irrevocably created an exclusively independent Arab state in 78% of historic Palestine - truncating Palestine to just 22% of the size within which the Jewish people had initially been given the opportunity in 1922 to reconstitute the Jewish National Home.


1948 Palestine therefore was only 22% of the size of 1922 - 1946 Palestine. 78% of Palestine - today called Jordan - together with its Palestinian Arab inhabitants had already achieved statehood in 1946.

Arab propagandists deliberately ignore the events of 1922 and 1946 to justify their claim that Israel now occupies 100% of Palestine. They are only telling 22% of the story - classic misinformation at its Goebbels' best.

That Mahmoud Abbas can apparently repeat this fiction unchallenged is even more striking when one considers he is also the Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) whose Constitution claims that Jordan remains an inseparable part of Palestine notwithstanding the actions of Great Britain and the League of Nations in 1922 and 1946.
Click to expand...
 
what a surprise buffalo uses a propaganda website for info. referring to transjordan as part of historic palestine is dishonest and bullshit idea.
 
disease said:
Explain why Israel has ignored avery resolution passed by the UN except 181?
Click to expand...

U.N. Resolution 181 is a United Nations Security Council Resolution, which has weight of law behind it, as per U.N. Charter, when the Arabs rejected U.N.S.R. 181 it became a moot point.

http://www.mythsandfacts.com/Conflict/10/UN-resolutions.pdf

The UN Secretary-General, the General Assembly, and now the international Court of Justice (ICJ) seem ignorant of the General Assembly’s powers or perhaps prefers to ignore them. These UN organs even fail to note that “affirmation” means merely a declarative statement of sentiment. It is not a directive. It is not law.

In any case, this and a host of other anti-Israel resolutions passed annually are not legally binding documents by any measure. One does not even have to be an experienced judge to see this; one need only to read the UN Charter to establish this fact. Article 10 of the UN Charter states:

“The General Assembly may discuss any questions or any matters within the scope of the present Charter or relating to the powers and functions of any organs provided for in the present Charter, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations to the Members of the United Nations or to the Security Council or to both on any such questions or matters.” [italics by author].


Past members of the ICJ have gone on record as underscoring that the UN Charter does not grant the General Assembly (or the International Court of Justice, for that matter) authority to enact or amend international law.
Professor Judge Schwebel, former President of the International Court of Justice, has stated that:

“… the General Assembly of the United Nations can only, in principle, issue ‘recommendation’ which are not of a binding character, according to Article 10 of the Charter of the United Nations.”2

Schwebel also cites the (1950) opinion of Judge, Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, a former member judge of the International Court of Justice, who declared that:
“… the General Assembly has no legal power to legislate or bind its members by way of recommendation.”3

Yet another former ICJ judge, Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice has been just as resolved in rejecting what he labeled the “illusion” that a General Assembly resolution can have “legislative effect.”4
Academics and renowned international law experts also agree. Professor Julius Stone illuminates this subject by pointing out:
“In his book The Normative Role of the General Assembly of the United Nations and the Declaration of Principles of Friendly Relations, Professor Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz5 is led to conclude that the General Assembly lacks legal authority either to enact or to ‘declare’ or ‘determine’ or ‘interpret’ international

© 2007, Eli E. Hertz Page 2 of 4 UN Resolutions
law so as legally to bind states by such acts, whether these states be members of the United Nations or not, and whether these states voted for or against or abstained from the relevant vote or did not take part in it.”6

IN A NUTSHELL
• UN Resolution 181 legitimized a Jewish state in 1947. The resolution also proposed an Arab state, but the Arabs refused to accept it and went to war against the newly declared State of Israel.
• In the late 1990s, Arab leaders sought to roll back the clock to 1947 and accept the UN partition plan recommended in Resolution 181. But their acceptance was 50 years too late. Its proposals concerning an Arab Palestinian state had become a moot point – outdated and irrelevant to current realities. For it to be accepted today would have meant the demise of the State of Israel.
• Neither references to the refugee problem nor an Israeli withdrawal constitute UN directives. They are solely recommendations upon which negotiations and reconciliation between the parties should be conducted.
• The refugee problem was never viewed as a stand-alone issue in the 1948-vintage UN Resolution. Moreover, it did not speak of Arabs alone, but of all refugees caused by the conflict. Often forgotten is that the conflict created as many or more Jewish refugees who fled the Arabs lands for their lives; a majority found refuge in Israel.
• The language of UN Resolution 194 clearly expects governments and authorities (not just Israel) to help solve the refugee problem. There were five hostile Arab governments involved in aggression and war that created the refugee problem, and the resolution expects them to be part of the solution.
• Resolution 242 is the cornerstone for “a just and lasting peace.” It calls for a negotiated solution between the parties based on “secure and recognized boundaries.”
• Resolution 1515, a ‘Blueprint for Peace’ if implemented will violate the Mandate for Palestine and international law. The Mandate clearly calls to “facilitate … and shall encourage … close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.
Click to expand...

1 Dore Gold, “Baseless Comparisons: UN Security Council Resolutions on Iraq and Israel,” Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, September 24, 2002, at .http://www.jcpa.org/brief/brief2-7.htm
2 Professor, Judge Stephen M. Schwebel, What Weight to Conquest? in “Justice in International Law”, Cambridge University Press, 1994. Judge Schwebel has served on the International Court since 15 January 1981. He was Vice-President of the Court from 1994 to 1997 and has been President from 1997 to 2000. A former Deputy Legal Adviser of the United States Department of State and Burling Professor of International Law at the School of Advanced International Studies of The Johns Hopkins University (Washington). Judge Schwebel is the author of several books and over 150 articles on problems of international law and organization. He is Honorary President of the American Society of International Law. Opinions quoted in this critiques are not derived from his position as a judge of the ICJ.
3 Ibid.
4 Cited in “Israel and Palestine, Assault on the law of nations,” Professor Julius Stone, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981. p. 29.
5 Professor Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz “The United Nations declaration on friendly relations and the system of the sources of international law” Publisher: Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands; Germantown, Md.: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979. ISBN: 902860149X.
6 Professor Julius Stone (1907-1985), “Israel and Palestine, Assault on the Law of Nations” The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981, p. 127. The late Professor Julius Stone was recognized as one of the twentieth century's leading authorities on the Law of Nations. His work represents a detailed analysis of the central principles of international law governing the issues raised by the Arab-Israel conflict. He was one of a few scholars to gain outstanding recognition in more than one field. Professor Stone was one of the world’s best-known authorities in both Jurisprudence and International Law.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top