errr ....you can find scriptures (and also scriptural commentaries) in most universitiesGod is writing university text now? Get a grip man.
errr ....you can find scriptures (and also scriptural commentaries) in most universitiesGod is writing university text now? Get a grip man.
errr ....you can find scriptures (and also scriptural commentaries) in most universities
Nice try but you`ll need to repair the university commentary in your previous thread before you can issue that statement.
I'm not sure I follow.You can take your comment entirely out of context if you want but you`re not fooling anybody except yourself(that`s a generic pearl of wisdom, not mine)
ok i understand , u just can't handle life itself and creating imaginary super father figures(gods) to protect you and love you infinitly.
Its like normal stuff like imaginary friends of lil kids,but even they (the majority at least)grow up after some point...some dont i guess...
If universities are largely places where one reads stuff and figures it out, what do you suppose scriptures (along with scriptural commentaries) are doing in universities?
Why do Abrahamic religions try to personify the concept of God? Why not an abstract, unfamiliar, unhumanlike God?
T
Isaiah 55
8 “ For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
If a customer wants to get a degree by not reading anything or figuring anything out for them self, they probably won't be able to take advantage of the services at a universityUniversity is a business, you give the customer what he wants. If you like trying to make sense out of drivel then they will provide it for you. Trying to equate religious study with everything else universities offer is like comparing Mr. Ed to Secretariat.
I
For some reason though you advocate this is the only means of approaching theistic topics. Its almost like you have never heard of the word "philosophy" .....
sureI thought we went through this aeons ago. You know my stance, philosophy is cool as long as it doesn't refer to religion.
just as long as you realize that this doesn't grant you the strongest philosophical position on the subject ....
On the contrary even the weakest philosopher can take on philosophy in whatever form it comes.You just have to realize you have the weakest. Even if I say nothing, you're still coming in second.
On the contrary...
On the contrary even the weakest philosopher can take on philosophy in whatever form it comes.
when ever you are ready to apply yourself, drop me a line ....When will you stop beating around the bush and cough up some god like you said you would?
and lemme guessYep, but not religious philosophy. I could have a room full of theists debating religious philosophy and the net product of their effort would total zero.
obviously philosophy (aside from any particular foray into religious aspects of it) is not your forte ...Therefore, weak or strong, it's a stalemate whenever you or another religious philosopher lock horns.
and lemme guess
a room full of philosophical atheists really cuts to the car chase ...
obviously philosophy (aside from any particular foray into religious aspects of it) is not your forte ...