Except maybe as a defamation that I'm simply reposting some of the sites you hate.
You aren't just reposting "sites". You are repeating "arguments" and canards and false claims of fact - entire propaganda derived descriptions of situations, framed in the propagandist's language. and supported by links to propaganda sources. American rightwing authoritarian propaganda - fascist propaganda.
This crap is completely familiar to Americans. You are completely oblivious to its nature, origins, and relationship with reality.
For me, a video is a video, and, once no-one claims it was not Clinton, it tells something about Clinton.
Yes, we know. That kind of naivety is how you so often get played by American marketing professionals.
In case of the Clinton videos, we had a discussion here, where I have changed my opinion about which information given in the video is useful and what makes no sense because it was out of context. So, this was a clear case of an evaluation.
You only noticed one of them was "out of context" in one particular and trivial way, and even that only because three or four other people not only pointed to the obvious edit - right in front of you all along - but found the full video. And you still haven't acknowledged the context for the full video, or the other videos, or any other "information" about Clinton you think you possess. You have instead denied - flat out denied, in specific language - the necessity of knowing that context, when evaluating. And since you don't know it, and refuse to learn it, your "evaluations" are easily manipulated and you get played by American rightwing authoritarian marketing pros.
During Cold War time I was sitting in the communist block without any access to any American propaganda, neither from the left, nor from the right, so that your question why I believe them is completely off.
So you believe them now because they agree with the propaganda you had from the communist bloc media then? That would answer my question.
And again you, despite my clarifications that it is far from sure what Trump will really do, defame, naming Trump "my isolationist"
You were the guy posting here that Trump was more likely to be isolationist than Clinton because of 1) bullshit Trump said, that you did not realize the nature of because you were ignorant of American politics and refused all proffered information, and 2) sillyass psychopathology you attributed to Clinton, because you didn't realize you were being suckered by Republican campaign slanders and - again - refused all proffered information.
You not only fell for Trump the Isolationist, you doubled down - refusing to reconsider even in the light of information provided to you. And all that was perfectly consistent with your inveterate blind spot regarding rightwing tyranny and how it establishes itself.
He's your isolationist. You pratfall that hard, you own what's stuck to your face.
