The Trump Presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.
Agrees!

However I think the American Mental Health professionals can also form an opinion, and as an organization voice their concerns (not as individuals) in a way that would be useful to the American people and the world generally. Even if they simply recommend that Trump attends a psychiatric assessment.
I don't think this can be done ethically. You can't offer an opinion for a patient that you haven't personally seen and if you have seen him as his doctor then you can't issue such an opinion due to doctor/client privilege.
 
well.. you know... these are unprecedented times....
How many people that are protesting now that are mental health professionals is any ones guess....
 
Just reading up on the Susan Rice saga..
Rice shared a tweet that said: "Trump loves and trusts the military so much he just kicked them out of the National Security Council and put in a Nazi in their place."

How many people have to consider the President as "Stone cold crazy" before he is officially crazy?
 
If the people of the USA are serious about their values they need to mobilize and "Occupy the White House" en masse, a few million peaceful people protesting should do the trick...
Perhaps Trump is insane enough to call an airstrike on the White House?
There is an old Russian joke: Why can there be no color revolution in the US? Because there is no US embassy in the US.

It may be proven wrong. Even without a US embassy, there is sufficiently strong financial support for creating a color revolution in the US. There is. There is Soros, there is the US deep state, there are all the globalists. And, of course, the financial support for demonstrators is only one part - the much more important part of a color revolution is media support. And media support against Trump is obvious. So we will see if a color revolution is possible in a state without US embassy.
 
It may be proven wrong. Even without a US embassy, there is sufficiently strong financial support for creating a color revolution in the US. There is. There is Soros, there is the US deep state, there are all the globalists. And, of course, the financial support for demonstrators is only one part - the much more important part of a color revolution is media support. And media support against Trump is obvious. So we will see if a color revolution is possible in a state without US embassy.
Unnecessary. We have Congress, which acts in the service of the deep state, and has impeachment powers. And we have elections for President every four years - a "color revolution" would take longer than that to organize and succeed.

As far as the globalists, they support Trump. And Soros is not that powerful within the US - others, opposed to him, have more money and more power.

Meanwhile, "the media" is not all that opposed or revolutionary - major players within it support Trump wholeheartedly, and no major player is completely set against him.

So some other support for such an undertaking would have to be found.
 
An interesting element of a Russian comment about what Trump is doing (in Russian: http://ruslanostashko.livejournal.com/83948.html my translation)

Trump detractors don't get the main point, which is that those who have elected him are completely excited to see how the liberal community in US and Europe is frustrated and agitates in their TV studios and papers. For those who support Trump every teardrop of Madonna, Rihanna, Hillary Clinton and John McCain is a proof that Trump - is genuine, that Trump is not like all those, that Trump is what America and the whole world needs.

Another side remark is about a quite popular and influential Russian political talk show. Of course, in its main direction it is pro-Russian. But their point is also to allow quite heavy confrontation among the participants. In this case, the funny thing I found worth to mention was the last part of it, which was about the Ukraine. In this part, where have been the moderator and seven participants. During the discussion, it appeared that from these seven participants six were Ukrainian citizens, and only one was a Russian citizen.


Ok, some of the Ukrainian citizens were emigrants, some from Donbass, so that they supported a pro-Russian position. But, anyway, I think it is an illustration about real freedom of speech in Russia.

And we have elections for President every four years - a "color revolution" would take longer than that to organize and succeed.
The Ukrainian maidan needed several months, and at 21.2. they had reached a diplomatic victory, with earlier elections, so that they had to wait only half a year to win the elections in a completely legal way. Nonetheless, they preferred a coup.
As far as the globalists, they support Trump.
Sorry, this is nonsense. Ok, this may be an irrelevant disagreement about words, feel free to name a "globalist" whatever you like. I name "globalists" those who want a world government. Those who supported the unipolar world lead by the US, fighting against a multipolar world.
Meanwhile, "the media" is not all that opposed or revolutionary - major players within it support Trump wholeheartedly, and no major player is completely set against him.
At least here in Germany I have never seen such a unified support for one side of a political fight as in these elections. Much more rigorous and fanatical even compared with other campaigns, like the Bolotnaja color revolution in Russia or the maidan. Ok, one can disagree that the support of these events has been already so close to 100% that no further increase was possible in principle. But, it appears, it is possible.
 
This is an interesting one:

132b37fa0c784e78a7b1d982cbaafe29


http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/24/politics/donald-trump-immigrant-wives/

"My mother was born in Scotland, in the Hebrides, in Stornoway, so that's serious Scotland. And she was a great woman," Trump said in a 2010 documentary. "Whenever anything was on about, ceremonial about the Queen she could sit at the television and just watch it. She had great respect for the Queen and for everything (she) represents"
In 1930, an 18-year-old Mary MacLeod sailed for America from Glasgow on the S.S. Transylvania, according to a copy of the ship's passenger list on Ancestry.com. MacLeod arrived in New York and married Fred Trump, the son of German immigrants himself.


"My grandfather Frederick Trump came to the United States in 1885. He joined the great gold rush and instead of gold he decided to open up some hotels in Alaska. He did fantastically well. He loved this country, likewise my father and now me," Trump said in a taped message for a German-American pride parade a few years ago.

So... according to Trump, his mother and grandfather were immigrants...

Melania Trump moved to New York about 20 years ago. The Slovenian born model now has her own jewelry and caviar-cream skincare lines. She married Trump in 2005 in a fairytale wedding that included a wedding gown reported to cost $100,000. And the next year, she became a citizen -- a decade after arriving in America.

Melania is an immigrant...

And of course, Trump's first wife, Ivana, was an immigrant too. Born in Czechoslovakia, she married an Austrian ski instructor in order to get a foreign passport to leave the communist country, her divorce lawyer has said.
A few years later, she "went to my aunt and uncle in Canada," she has said.
She and Trump married in 1977, but she didn't become an American citizen for another 11 years.

So was Ivana...

Curiouser and curiouser...
 
schmelzer link said:
Trump detractors don't get the main point, which is that those who have elected him are completely excited to see how the liberal community in US and Europe is frustrated and agitates in their TV studios and papers. For those who support Trump every teardrop of Madonna, Rihanna, Hillary Clinton and John McCain is a proof that Trump - is genuine, that Trump is not like all those, that Trump is what America and the whole world needs.
Why on earth would you think the Trump detractors in the US would be unaware of this, or not "get it"?

That inherent mental glitch is the most obvious thing about the Trump voters, and they have not been at all shy about declaiming it - and explaining themselves thereby - for over a year now.
The childishness of the Trump supporter - and Trump himself - is one of the major objections to his Presidency. These people are not grownups, and government is something that only grownups can handle.
"As far as the globalists, they support Trump."
Sorry, this is nonsense. Ok, this may be an irrelevant disagreement about words, feel free to name a "globalist" whatever you like. I name "globalists" those who want a world government. Those who supported the unipolar world lead by the US, fighting against a multipolar world.
Yeah, those people - they're for Trump, in the US. That's what they hear when they hear "America First" - a world run by the US in its own interests, a unipolar world in which the pole is the United States. When they hear "multipolar", they think "multicultural", and that means liberals being all soft on communists and black people at the UN. They're against that.
At least here in Germany I have never seen such a unified support for one side of a political fight as in these elections.
In the US, things were quite different - Trump played the media like a fiddle. He had the major TV stations showing - live - fifteen and twenty minutes of empty podium, waiting for him to show up. It was a standing joke.
 
Just reading up on the Susan Rice saga..
Rice shared a tweet that said: "Trump loves and trusts the military so much he just kicked them out of the National Security Council and put in a Nazi in their place."

How many people have to consider the President as "Stone cold crazy" before he is officially crazy?
He is not mentally ill, just full of bad ideas.
 
There is an old Russian joke: Why can there be no color revolution in the US? Because there is no US embassy in the US.

And you think that makes sense? Well I guess that explains why your beloved Mother Russia remains a backward nation.

It may be proven wrong. Even without a US embassy, there is sufficiently strong financial support for creating a color revolution in the US. There is. There is Soros, there is the US deep state, there are all the globalists. And, of course, the financial support for demonstrators is only one part - the much more important part of a color revolution is media support. And media support against Trump is obvious. So we will see if a color revolution is possible in a state without US embassy.
Unlike your beloved Mother Russia, the media is obligated to report the truth rather than the dictates you your beloved Putinia. And what the hell does Soros or "globalists" have to do with color revolutions?
 
In one week Trump has managed to confuse and alienate most of the world. He has confused and alienated world leaders, business leaders around the globe and his own party. That's quite an accomplishment. :)
 
No, he is mentally ill. That's why he has a bunch of bad ideas.
I object to this on the basis of science. It belittles people who are actually mentally ill. Plenty of people with typical brain development act out of fear, hold bigoted values, covet power, and subscribe to conspiracy theories.
 
I object to this on the basis of science. It belittles people who are actually mentally ill. Plenty of people with typical brain development act out of fear, hold bigoted values, covet power, and subscribe to conspiracy theories.
No. It doesn't. It's just a matter of fact. Whether you want to admit it or not, whether it offends your sense of political correctness or not, it's a scientific truth. Mental illness does affect the quality of decisions an individual makes and that fact is widely recognized. That's why every state in the Union have laws which allows the state to intervene in an individual's decision making. When an individual becomes a threat to himself or others, the state intervenes to protect the individual and others.

Trump is clearly afflicted by narcissistic personality disorder. You really don't have to look hard to find it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...nauguration-crowd-size-paranoia-a7552661.html
 
No. It doesn't. It's just a matter of fact. Whether you want to admit it or not, whether it offends your sense of political correctness or not, it's a scientific truth. Mental illness does affect the quality of decisions an individual makes and that fact is widely recognized. That's why every state in the Union have laws which allows the state to intervene in an individual's decision making. When an individual becomes a threat to himself or others, the state intervenes to protect the individual and others.

Trump is clearly afflicted by narcissistic personality disorder. You really don't have to look hard to find it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/donald-trump-mental-illness-narcisissm-us-president-psychologists-inauguration-crowd-size-paranoia-a7552661.html

Trump is clearly afflicted by narcissistic personality disorder. You really don't have to look hard to find it. Is that an undisputable "fact" . . . .or simply YOUR opinion? After all, you may be somewhat biased by observing the former POTUS over the last 8 years!! (IMHO - not proven fact!!! - observe MY honesty!)
 
Trump is clearly afflicted by narcissistic personality disorder. You really don't have to look hard to find it. Is that an undisputable "fact" . . . .or simply YOUR opinion? After all, you may be somewhat biased by observing the former POTUS over the last 8 years!! (IMHO - not proven fact!!! - observe MY honesty!)

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck... it's probably a duck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top