Why thank you Lemming3K,
I'm glad you've conceded it's "evidence" it's taken you long, but im glad you came to your senses in the end. Now that you consider it evidence, you can investigate the claims.
Also in a court law, analysis of scientists, forensics, and doctors is produced, sometimes in written form, and sometimes by their testimony, this is considered analytical evidence. Much like the Physical evidence I have already produced, which are not claims, but analytical reports of physical phenomena.
Thus thus far, I have produced:
1: Probability evidence: High probability of Aliens.
2: Testimonial evidence of NASA, USAF, CIA, NSA
3: Analytical evidence: Radar reports, Radar-visual reports, and Airforce, and physical traces, and investigation of EM effects of anamolous phenomena
I will of course produce more, but can you at least engage the evidence I have produced thus far. Now that you recognise it
And in your defence mikey i dont consider you a fanatic, just gullible
As I am a best judge of myself, and as you do not consider me irrational, I am most certainly not gullible. If I do say so myself, I am of a very analytical nature, and have a very healthy intelligence. I do not accept anything at face value - not even my existence - or crop circles for that matter
I have been known to in the past, rip apart some UFO theories, and cases. I have also debunked, and debunked severely, the famous crop circle of milky hill, and even at this forum, the so called photographs of aliens, that were being praised for there realism. I do not believe in Bob Lazar's story. In fact the first post I made at this forum was to debunk the case of the ancient nuclear war. Although I would love to believe it, and even despite the compelling story of Adamsn bridge, I still dismissed it as inconclusie.
I was asked to leave the last UFO forum I was in, because I severely criticized people there, and rejected 80% of what topics discussed.
Not very gullible, eh? If im not irrational, and I'm not gullible, then I'm rational. Have a think about that
However I could accuse the skeptics of being gullible, of buying every Anti-UFO musing and passing it of with conviction. Some golden ones, "UFO movement is fanatic and cultist", "Holding a press conference is cheap and easy" amongst others. In fact Im not sure, if the word gullible is apt, it's more foolish.