So much for reading that book. Spoilers everywhere
I didn't know what to expect, but that video is pretty interesting.
I didn't know what to expect, but that video is pretty interesting.
I don't remember either, but found the movie.....I'm trying to remember if they had the "zip guns" in the movie. In the book, they shot something like a throwing star that would take a triffid's head clean off.
Reminds me of a little joke; Prostitute asking her friend "can you lend me 20 bucks until I get on my back again"
Sonuvagun. Inferno was made into a movie...
That'd be the remake, with Jackie Chan.I'm trying to remember if they had the "zip guns" in the movie. In the book, they shot something like a throwing star that would take a triffid's head clean off.
True, Dave - also, these topics are easier to discuss online than in person, most of the time. I'm not walking up to my neighbor to get his take on ''entropy in everyday life,'' or ''should science replace religion?''
Maybe I should. Hmm......
@W4U - They alter their behaviors to ''fit in'' (adapt) so to speak?
You have an interesting way of looking at things, Rainbow.time as a commodity of perpetual loss leveraging.
people spend far less time devoted to talking in real life face to face with people about intellectual issues.
this goes hand in hand with the ever decreasing wage rate of the working class.
with manufacturing and administration jobs being outsourced to 3rd world no rights markets this has seen a landslide effect in the loss of intellectual attainment as a collective social culture.
And smoke!..........The Post Whatever Thread
I was playing the yard maintenance game today. Trim a tree, sit down and have a smoke. Trim a bush, sit down and have a smoke. Move some debris, sit down and have a smoke. Thank the Universe for my chain saw and hedge trimmer
You just exactly described my every weekday while I'm between contracts.The Post Whatever Thread
I was playing the yard maintenance game today. Trim a tree, sit down and have a smoke. Trim a bush, sit down and have a smoke. Move some debris, sit down and have a smoke. Thank the Universe for my chain saw and hedge trimmer
It explains what begun a long time ago as bacterial "quorum sensing" and the order on which ENTP rests is provided by the microtubules present in all eukaryotic organisms, which can be called proto- or quasi-intelligences.So much for reading that book. Spoilers everywhere
I didn't know what to expect, but that video is pretty interesting.
It explains what begun a long time ago as bacterial "quorum sensing" and the order on which ENTP rests is provided by the microtubules present in all eukaryotic organisms, which can be called proto- or quasi-intelligences.
Also addressed by Anil Seth that; "when people agree (quorum sensing) on their hallucinations (best guesses), we call that reality"
This is all everybody does all the time. Your brain can only make a best gues of what your senses observe.Does anyone on here do this? :-}
Gotcha.This is all everybody does all the time. Your brain can only make a best gues of what your senses observe.
Optical illusions work on everyone, but agreement on an optical illusion is not recognizing reality. That would be creating a false reality by agreement.
And that happens often as well......
What is the "evidence to the contrary" though, if not another shared "hallucination"?Gotcha.
I'm not sure I think of ''best guesses'' as ''hallucinations,'' though. I think if we insist on the hallucination being real (to us, in the moment), despite evidence to the contrary...then, that would be a delusion. Hmm.
Well, if five people have claimed to see Big Foot last night in the town they all live in, separately/together (that part doesn't matter) - I'd consider that a hallucination, or just a mistake in identifying something else as Big Foot. Now if they insist on holding their claims to be true, and we know there's no evidence to support the existence of Big Foot, they'd be delusional.What is the "evidence to the contrary" though, if not another shared "hallucination"?
That's what I was getting at. How many people have to share a "hallucination" before it becomes "reality"? Even if we have hard evidence one way or the other, that evidence has to be agreed on too.But where do we draw that line?
True. I'm reminded of Virgin Mary ''visions'' that have been reported over the centuries, and many Catholics believe them ...without even looking into the stories.That's what I was getting at. How many people have to share a "hallucination" before it becomes "reality"? Even if we have hard evidence one way or the other, that evidence has to be agreed on too.