I drew the same conclusion. And all I read was the opening post.
Alas Leftists draw erroneous conclusions day after weary day. Today is no different.
The Nonsense of Atheists
- Thread starter RenaissanceMan
- Start date
Alas Leftists draw erroneous conclusions day after weary day. Today is no different.
I drew the same conclusion. And all I read was the opening post.
after i took a long hiatus from this site, i came back and newbies were comparing me to sandy. i'm still kinda bitter about it actually.
SmackedByLife
Registered Member
Are you implying that religious belief has anything to do with an individual's intelligence? Please don't make me start listing all of the brilliant atheists in the world.
Please don't compare him to Sandy. I thought her views were of course reprehensible, but we were civil to each other, she's a nice lady! We had some good private conversations.
i'm dumbfounded by this.
'Sandy' was vile. Give it a little longer and I'm sure this troll will reveal it's true colours.
But she wasn't a bully.
He's the only one who has made it to my ignore list.
We actually had a brief but rocky affair. She not as innocent as she claims. She made me do things that were... unbiblical, I'll just leave it at that.
We actually had a brief but rocky affair. She not as innocent as she claims. She made me do things that were... unbiblical, I'll just leave it at that.
spider!Which you apparently are not aware of; however, let's cut right to it. If you are inclined to tell me that "my god exists" then you are a liar.
That would be incorrect. There are smart theists too. A correct statement would be that the overall population of Atheists have higher IQ scores than the overall population of theists. If you have never seen evidence for this before then I would be happy to provide it... and a spoon... so you can eat me when you see it
.Sarcasm of course is born about as a form of deception. If you want to add deception to your list of traits then go for it.
That would be incorrect. Both atheists and theists have the capacity to be rational and scientific.
What lies specifically?
You're not very good at taking your own advice.
Sounds craptacular.
No? She hated homosexuals, migrant workers, the unemployed,... if she voiced the same opinions face to face as she did here, sure, she'd qualify as being a bully.
All we need is some racism from 'RenaissanceMan' to clinch it's a sock puppet of 'Sandy'.
Hating portions of humanity does not classify one as a bully.
Perhaps her style of posts might lead to that claim, but bullying generally requires there to be an imbalance of power, and with the Great Ignore Button of Antioch that they have provided us with at Sciforums, we have in our own hands the ability to negate anyone's apparent power in a single stroke... or click.
Because she couldn't bully people here, doesn't mean she didn't exhibit all the qualities of being a bully in real life.
So the puppeteer is playing a slightly different character.
This person is not a newbie.
Ah so the right is never wrong. Glad we cleared that up.
after i took a long hiatus from this site, i came back and newbies were comparing me to sandy. i'm still kinda bitter about it actually.
Can't say I blame you, I'd rather be called a cunt than compared to sandy.