The "homophobic" lie

[superluminal]

Freud is overrated and quite quite dated.

He probably grew up in a family where everyone was always clothed.

Probably had secret fantasies about his family members and made it "normal" for himself to think like that.

Well, sam, if we used you as an example of "normal" we'd probably all be at the far ends of the curve.

 

[superluminal]

Depends on whats normal; apparently in your part of the world, that is normal :shrug:

Pretty much.

 

[shorty_37]

Well, sam, if we used you as an example of "normal" we'd probably all be at the far ends of the curve.

:bravo: No kidding! I rather be abnormal then.

 

[Xev]

Freud is overrated and quite quite dated.

He probably grew up in a family where everyone was always clothed.

Probably had secret fantasies about his family members and made it "normal" for himself to think like that.

Freud is scientifically irrelevent.

 

[superluminal]

What does that tell you? The knowledge of seeing your own mom automatically makes your mind take a different approach to how you view them sexually. Thus, erections aroused from seeing immediate family is very strange and uncommon. At least, in normal households.

I think you must be a teenager, right?

 

[Kadark]

I think you must be a teenager, right?

Because I don't get a boner from seeing my mom?

 

[S.A.M.]

Pretty much.

I find it really strange that people sexualise their family members, its automatically an ewww factor for me. And I have actually seen members of my family in various stages of undress.

 

[superluminal]

Look, all of you. We're talking about a phase that younger children may or may-not go through.

 

[shorty_37]

Look, all of you. We're talking about a phase that younger children may or may-not go through.

Exactly! They just don't see the possibilty of that ever happening though.
I think it's naive.

 

[superluminal]

Because I don't get a boner from seeing my mom?

No. Just a guess.

 

[superluminal]

Exactly! They just don't see the possibilty of that ever happening though.
I think it's naive.

Some people seem to like reading things into words that were never there...

 

[Xev]

Look, all of you. We're talking about a phase that younger children may or may-not go through.

So we're not really talking about something that may or may not even exist.

I mean, in my circle, coke-fiends are not widely regarded as reliable sorts.

 

[superluminal]

So we're not really talking about something that may or may not even exist.

I mean, in my circle, coke-fiends are not widely regarded as reliable sorts.

Oh boy. As far as I know, it exists in a non-trivial proportion of normal young humans.

Sheesh.

 

[S.A.M.]

Oh boy. As far as I know, it exists in a non-trivial proportion of normal young humans.

Sheesh.

Based on what exactly?

 

[superluminal]

Also, it appears to be far more common in males than females, which may explain some of the blank stares we're getting from the females here.

 

[superluminal]

Based on what exactly?

Reading? Conversations with a billion other men in my years on the planet?

 

[superluminal]

The billion is a slight exaggeration...

 

[shorty_37]

Reading? Conversations with a billion other men in my years on the planet?

But SAM seems to think she knows the MALE MIND and how it works!

Next she is going to tell us what it is like to get an erection

 

[superluminal]

But SAM seems to think she knows the MALE MIND and how it works!

I can guarantee that is false.

 

[Xev]

Oh boy. As far as I know, it exists in a non-trivial proportion of normal young humans.

Sheesh.

My tounge is fairly firmly planted in my cheek here. But what evidence do we have that the "Oedipus" complex actually exists?