The conference hall debate!

Status
Not open for further replies.
See a doctor. (Psychiatrist can prescribe medication. Councilors cannot.)
I try to avoid medication, I do know my own problems, I am wise and aware of them, but nevertheless I have a brain that can think well and I am sure my ideas have some merit , so If I can get one idea completely understand I will feel much better in my self, because helping the world out is the best contribution anyone can make in life.
 
I try to avoid medication, I do know my own problems, I am wise and aware of them, but nevertheless I have a brain that can think well and I am sure my ideas have some merit , so If I can get one idea completely understand I will feel much better in my self, because helping the world out is the best contribution anyone can make in life.

Didn't you say somewhere "After a brew" i.e. alcohol?

That affects the chemicals in your brain, would it not?
 
If there were truths in your ideas we wouldn't all call it gibberish, tc.

Sorry to hear that you feel you lack a purpose in life, but science clearly isn't it.
I understand why you'd want your kids to be proud of you, but are they going to feel proud if what you do is completely misunderstand science and spend countless hours on a science board exposing your lack of knowledge?
You may want to look at your science and answers in this thread from members, there is a lot of truths in my ideas.
 
Think the denial is on your end, tc. When countless people across several fora all say your ideas have no merit, reconsider your position.
 
''Clear Light
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the 1960s American psychedelic rock band. For other uses, see Clearlight (disambiguation).
Clear Light was a psychedelic rock band that formed in Los Angeles in 1966.''



''White Light may refer to:



I am still looking around my room for this white light you keep saying is not clear light...
 
hmmm, let me think.
Please do!
Although you haven't, thus far, shown that you're capable of so doing.

because I have read it and viewed it in documentaries and most of you have told me over and over again things, things that are not quite accurate.
Actually things ARE "that accurate".
You have demonstrated, time and again, in just about every one of your posts that you don't understand science.
You do NOT learn science from watching documentaries.
Which science books have you read?
And you have consistently failed to understand and learn what others have told about science.
 
Please do!
Although you haven't, thus far, shown that you're capable of so doing.


Actually things ARE "that accurate".
You have demonstrated, time and again, in just about every one of your posts that you don't understand science.
You do NOT learn science from watching documentaries.
Which science books have you read?
And you have consistently failed to understand and learn what others have told about science.
No I have demonstrated Empirical evidence.

''Empirical evidence is information that justifies a belief in the truth or falsity of a claim. In the empiricist view, one can claim to have knowledge only when one has a true belief based on empirical evidence. This stands in contrast to the rationalist view under which reason or reflection alone is considered to be evidence for the truth or falsity of some propositions.[2] The senses are the primary source of empirical evidence. Although other sources of evidence, such as memory and the testimony of others, ultimately trace back to some sensory experience, they are considered to be secondary, or indirect.[2]''
 
Nope.
You made up bullshit and demonstrated that you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.
It is neither bs or made up, you can not deny the clear of light in air, that is empirical evidence, one can claim to have knowledge only when one has a true belief based on empirical evidence, you can not deny that a wave is only a wave until interpreted by a means, more empirical evidence.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top