The bible is a large book and while the central themes are simple, there are many complexities as well. Do you feel that not understanding everything is a basis for throwing it out?
No, but if something is misunderstood, we can't call it fact either.
what do you mean "translation problem"? I disagree that the bible is not defensible as truth. There are numerous "authorities" who defend it daily. Have you read anything by Dr. Gary Habermas or Josh McDowell for example?
Look up the word "Hell" in KJV. Cross reference that with the hebrew text. Also, the word "cross"
All English Bibles have been translated, and have lost some meaning. Then, we have a culture barrier. Phrases and sayings in the time and culture, cannot be translated accurately.
Also, God did not write the Bible and all forms of communication are inadequate to relating ideas completely. That is why it is dangerous. A nut job could distort the unseen truth and cause harm, under the guise of religion. If the text was not open to so much interpretation, there would not be these problems. But, a major problem is text itself is just inadequate to convey ideas. There are a lot of barriers.
I am not interested in playing it safe so I will defend the bible as truth. If you are saying that small copyist errors exist in the present documents from which translations are made I will conceed this point, but they are insignificant.
The idea of "Hell" is not insignificant. There are two good discussions going on on these forums concerning the word. They are more than convincing.
this is illogical. Are you saying that this position is the hardest to defend or that believing in the bible makes a person "dangerous"?
Believing the Bible is God's word (by relation perfect) and that God is real is dangerous. Get involved with a church, and try to deal with the board and its issues. You will see what I mean.
There is a difference between "having it all figured out" and axiomatically accepting the bible as truth. It is impossible to arrive at absolute truth empiricle, one must, at some point, make a committment or remain an agnostic.
If it is impossible, why did make me this way, only to on the other hand require I trick my mind into believing under pain of death. It is torture. I've lived that way too long. The mind is a powerful thing, I very much had myself fooled. It was God's lack of response over and over that changed my mind. That, and the fact that others who are more knowledgable and spiritual than me fail to do the most basic thing and reach out and be willing to put the Bible aside for the holy spirit. The judgements of what is good is distorted if you are forced to live and think by the law.
me too! Here is the good news! You don't have to. In fact, the bible condemns such a practice. Blind faith is the faith of the atheist. The bible enjoins the believe to love God with all your MIND. The central message of the NT Church was the objective evidence of a bodily resurrection. The resurrection evidence caused former atheist (now deist) Antony Flew to admit that Christians are "rational" for believing on the evidence for this miracle alone.
How can I love something that doesn't exist?
What objective evidence of a bodily resurrection?
A silent God? I think he is rather noisy, day to day pouring forth speech through is creation and his Word, the Bible.
You are metaphorically speaking, that doesn't make it true.
If I make a sand castle, that doesn't mean the thing speaks on my behalf.
If I asked a group of people to write my ideas down, can those be trusted without me editing the work?
"If God did that for this man, why not me when I was a believer for many years? There is no excuse that anyone can give, so don't be foolish and say something like "all in God's timing" or "if it's God's will" or "you didn't pray right". All that bullcrap is a man-made excuse. If you believe in God, you believe that he lives (and you think you even feel his presence) and will not let his sheep go astray when they ask for the glory of God's kingdom."
God didn't do this for Gideon to prove his existance, he did it to prove to Gideon that he was directing him. But God normally doesn't do this and it is not necessary. We now have the complete scripture, a wealth of apologetics which support the Bible.
That is a shallow argument. If Gideon had faith, he would have believed God the first time. Having faith in God is having faith that he is God, capable of anything.
Gideon was asking if God was with him.
"Either God doesn't exist, or the Bible is false sometimes."
Illogical conclusion. If the bible is false sometimes, the biblical God does not exist.
Not really, us humans get it right sometimes. If there is a God, I'm sure the Bible is partially correct....but as the Bible depicts, humans get things wrong more than right.
All of the bible is true, it has been tested in the fire and refined seven times. It can be believed and trusted which is why it says "taste and see that the Lord is good, How blessed is the man who takes refuge in Him". You have allowed foolish people to steal away your faith. That is sad.
Hmmm...the foolish people you are talking about are only following scripture....they were the Pastor and his wife of our church!! They were good people, and truly live out the Bible and it's teachings.
Here's a little sample, not that you are an authority of what God thinks of the situation:
The church wanted to have a charity auction to raise money. The Pastor and his wife were against the idea stating that it is removing the opportunity for someone to give (as in fill the cup singlehandedly). They are right, and they are wrong.
Another example is Mary Magdaline pouring oil on Jesus. The Disciples said she was wrong, Jesus said she is right. But, the Disciples were right too, that oil could have fed many starving people. In the end, only God is right, not what the Disciples had been taught through scriptures.