In threads that are worthy of serious attention I offer serious contributions. (Thre are damn few of these on sciforums today.) In the rest, I heckle and hassle with gay abandon.
However, my last post was a serious contribution. Your posts are frequently casual remarks that imply (or sometimes explicitly claim) a conspiracy of big business, or big government, or big something that is out to get us. It'sl ludicrous and you really ought to have been called on it long before now.
Your contributions are especially dangerous because you don't sound like a nutter. The naive neophyte may be seduced by your reasonable sounding argument, especially - and this is my beef - when you are never challenged on it. Well, that may be about to change.
Ophiolite,
What you should be challenging is the "actual truth", I'm not going to ask you to believe my rendition of what
I think is going on, that's something I'm even against to an extent. I have had similar experiences to Vinko, however I did start to reason that
not knowing was causing me to conjecturize about the who, how and why's. Left completely unregulated then it would likely become a spiral of madness to those that themselves do not observe it.
The simple truths are manipulation occurs and only those that misuse via the methods used know why. It's easy to point fingers at different people, parties or governments in regards to "who" has done things along these lines in the past, however the very method employed is about deception, so any stated party could easily be a group masquerading under their moniker.
We could query the why's, like why clandestine?
Well that's dependent on a few factors like what end's they are trying to justify with their means. For instance a legal method would require higher documentation, a greater visibility in public profile, costs like insurances (in case things go awry), ethical foundations like the observation by mutual third-parties for Human Rights complacency and adherence to the "Nuremberg Code", as well as the actual subject compliance with being a volunteer. (Under the "Nuremberg Code", this gives the subject explicit rights to terminate the operation/research at any time, for any reason.)
This is technically a lot of work, which if done by various academies and institutes "
would be required" as apart of any proposal to a Science Council, which would evaluate the proposal and decide on the allocation of funds. It would also generate an extremely large paper trail considering that a scientific endeavour tends to be more utilitarian in regards to allowing research results and information on operations to be made available.
This leaves only two, possibly three types of operations that do not condone to the ethical rules practice by mainstream Scientists.
Military Operations exist outside of the common standards of law, especially when trumped through the usage of fast imposed and possibly ill thought out laws to counter terrorism. What is a civilian to military other than a potential combatant or casualty, this expresses where concern over ethics can originate. (... and concerns that any such operations not following the previously set science ethics, suggests that such operators are suffering themselves from psychological impairment.)
Privately Financed Institutes/Organisations/Groups can be anything from a company trying to beat everyone to the bleeding edge technology to replace the annoying mobile phones with direct brain communication, right through to various cult groups that have specific agenda's like bringing about their messiah or absorbing Thetan's. Such independent's aren't forced to follow legislation if they aren't known about, they don't answer to laws that their either don't think apply to them or just pretend they didn't see (
Criminal Negligence)
Some might be already known to operate criminal businesses, (e.g like Rustock) which is why the clandestine nature and also the capacity to openly use all networks to gain global usage. This would of course impose that various "Hack Groups" might well be working towards this outside of any Academic or Government.
(There is already a bunch of terms like
Neurohack and
Braingate floating around out there.)
As for the "how"?
Well the radiology used is within the same spectrum as Telecommunications (The overall band is between Infrared - Microwave - low Ultraviolet, I can't identify one particular frequency with the range because if matricing is used it will be more than just one.)
In any case the radiation is "Non-ionizing", but it does cause the heating of the blood barrier in the body, since that's how your body will attempt to regulate heat.
There are many compounded ailments that will all identify that the Immune system is under a "subliminal" attack. (The terming here is just the terming as to the opposite of blunt overt trauma) This generates Lythergy, skin conditions, swollen glands, higher than normal temperatures and even the increase in T-Cell production which can be counter-productive. (Like lessening the immune system against other threats.) That's without the psychological torment of third-party interaction.
(There is also old studies that implied a low level dose of microwave radiation to the brain would increase brain activity, which if done to a whole country would technically boost the potential speed of "advancement" which might be an avenue followed by a country or group without the consideration of consequences, but again this is obviously just speculation.)
In essence Ophiolite, these are very real factors that effect people, the only thing that is illusive is the "Who" but there are only so many rocks left unturned.
