Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

<i>there were a tiny number of Morton Thiokol technicians who worked on the Shuttle's O-Rings who had specifically stated that the conditions the orbiter had been exposed to the night before as well as the faulty design of the O-ring would cause it to fail during flight and the orbiter would be destroyed.</i>

Do you have a reference for that?

Why did the investigation take so long, then, and why is Feynman usually credited with advancing the O-ring explanation?
 
Originally posted by James R
Do you have a reference for that?
Click to expand...
I saw the correspondence some time ago -- it wasn't clear. It didn't say "hey, fools, the damn thing's going to explode!" It was a couple of very dense slides, filled with tables of data. The people at NASA who saw the slideshow didn't notice (or care) about what the data indicated. Had they paid attention to the details, they would have noticed the danger. But no Thiokol employee actually stood up and said it in plain english -- that I know of.

- Warren
 
You might want to read the official investigation reports from Feynman and his team.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone everyone for your prompt actions in this tragic concern.

In large measure, the experiment at the highest energy facility on earth at Fermilab is running at those very great energies of some 21.00E30 luminosity and near 2TeV energetics. The scientists who spoke with us whilst we picketed at Fermilab (Please note the photograph posted on this thread) indicated that that they were aware of the dangers inherent in their research yet they did not wish to work for, "Ma Bell Illinois," nor to give up their philosophic quest for truth via experimentation. In a sense, therfore, their persoinal needs and quests took precedence over the safety of all mankind. You may recall that at the time of the last flight of the Challenger the safety officer in charge refused to sign to allow the flight. This flight proceeded regardless of these warnings due the insistence of then President Ronald Reagan for his own political reasons.

These warnings of the well-known dangers inherent in high-energy physics experimentation have gone out since 1975. May we then continue with this work so long as breath remains.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf -and may the god Good have mercy on our souls!

Wishing one and all a -

VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS &

MOST HAPPY NEW YEAR !!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION ST FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for your most prompt actions in this tragic concern.

It is important to emphazie that alternate methodologies exist which can provide for even better analysis in high-energy physics of particle interactions at yet higher energies than those found in modern accelerators. These are scintillator arrays of electron and muon counters such as the KASCADE (Karlsruhe Shower Cone and Array Detector) for csomic rays: from K-H Kampert, et al The Physics of the Knee in the Cosmic Ray Spectrum, Proceedings of the ICRC 2001:1 Copernicus Geselschaft 2002.

Let us proceed in this direction towards safe and theorrtically sound research paramters while yet we may!

All the chidren will thank you fo your kind efforts on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

Every Best Wish for the New Year!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph. D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Best wishes for the new year paul.

ps. a supernova would make a great firework show wouldn't it :D
 
What does god have anything to do with this experiment? Is he afriad that we killed ourselves and he got no more follower?
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATON AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.

We have a responsibility to all life for its continuance from a compassionate standpoint. All of the views of life which have as common thread the love and trust of the other focus on compassion and forbearance towards others. It is not too great a generalization to extend this same compassionate regard to all creatures and even to the entire planet within a Gaia hypothesis.

Within a University community, this view is held almost universally so that while there are many separate and diverse philosophies, this respect towards all life and the quality thereof as well as our responsibility for our planetary existence may be thought as well-nigh universal sentiments within a collegial setting. This is now the middle of my 38th year of continuous service as full-time faculty at the University of Hawaii.

Supernova generation through a laboratory mischance would halt all these great achievements for which mankind has striven so valiantly over these many centuries. The great literature of humanism may be your inspiration in these matters.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf -
and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

All Best Wishes fo the New Year !!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENATION AT FERMILAB

May we thank everyone for your most kind support during 2002 in this tragic concern.

To review the work carried our during the year 2002 , please access the article by Kurt Rieselmann, See Tevatron Speeding Up, Vol 25, No. 21, Friday December 20, 2002. Such increments are cited as a 70% increase in transport efficiency and a 30% increase in antiparticle accumulation. There has been also a major increase in beam quality control for emittance - which is the control of beam diameter. This is of particular concern since it indicates that the focus of the beam is under greater control thus increasing the possiblity of breaching a classically defined potential barrier - forming a transition towards de Sitter space and thus releasing the force of Type Ia supernova on our planet and solar system. Greater control of the beam as well as increments in the aforementioned parameters are predicted for the year 2003.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

EVERY BEST WISH FOR THE NEW YEAR !!!

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIEMENTION AT AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for most kind efforts in this tragic concern.

The current parameters at Fermilab are in the range of 23E30 luminosity at almost 2TeV. Recall that this is 23 x 10 to the 30th number of particle collisions x 2 to the 10 to the 12th power electron volts. When multiplying exponents they are summed yielding around 10 to the 42nd power election volts. This is far greater than the largest cosmic ray at 10 to the 19th power electron volts. These large cosmic ray events are relatively infrequent being some two weeks apart and are of a solitary nature. In terms of numbers, 10 to the 19th power is much smaller than 10 to the 42nd power. We may well be testing the limits of the potential barrier which keeps us from the vast energies of de Sitter space at these parameter levels at Fermilab.

All the children will thank you for your most kind actions on ther behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
is this it? could this be the one? is the long wait finally over?

yes i see you paul!
think you can sneak in here without being noticed?
ha!
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATON AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks for everyone's actions in this tragic concern.

In the Fermilab website is a review of Research at Fermilab which details those significant Fermilab Experiments and Proposals. Here we may note the topic heading that Research at Fermilab will address the grand questions of particle physics today. Among these questions as listed is of note here, this is, "Are we part of a multidimensional megaverse?"

Important dimensional constructs in relativistic cosmology are the low-energy condition and also de Sitter space. An experimental demonstration of the presence of de Sitter space (the high-energy condition) would be to create a Type Ia supernova at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois. Unfortunately, this successful experiment would precude all other experiments ever being carrried out since the laboratory, planet earth, our solar system and a host of nearby stars would be detroyed by this vast explosion. Do we really wish to destroy ourselves, our families and our world by this reckless plunge into total and ultimate destruction?

All the children will thank you for your most kind efforts on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes for the New Year!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for your most kind interest and actions in this tragic concern.

The central theory postulated in this connectin is derived from those references cited on the first page of this thread. In this hypothesis, a potentially infinite number of universes form in de Sitter space. This is now the dominant theory of modern relativistic cosmology. An instability in this denslely energetic medium, it may be postulated, would give rise to universe formation.

Should we consider the low energy condition as fundamental in the ontogeny of universe formation, then it may be postulated that within the zeroth energy level - quantum instabilities occur which give rise to de Sitter space and to other densely energetic states here terrmed, "quous," which form the basis for yet other cosmologies not identical with our own. Where universe formation, under this postulation is the basis for the observation of gamma ray bursters which are found at cosmological distances, also in isotropic distribution under this postulation of observations may then be found longer lasting and yet more energetic cosmic-ray sources. These would then be, under this postulation, evidence for quous formation!

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy ono our souls!

All best wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimenation
 
Last edited:
Joe Halderman wrote a (really bad) scifi books about this a few years ago called 'Forever Peace.'
 
After listening to Dixon's ramblings for a while, I think I'll have to conclude like everyone else that he is probably a fruitcake. I can't understand a darn thing in any of his posts. It seems to me he knows how to throw big words around, but doesn't know what those big words mean.
 
It seems to me he knows how to throw big words around, but doesn't know what those big words mean.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I agree with you,I still think this thread belongs in Pseudoscience!
 
is this it paul? are we doomed? do i have time to bid farewell to family and friends?

yes you paul!
think you can sneak in here without being noticed?
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

May we extend our gratitude for everyone's strong actions in this most tragic concern.

Please review the posting for Astronomy in sciforums, Short and long gamma ray bursts have different origins, Porfiry 11-13-00 08:40 PM.
"In their brief moment of glory, the burst outshines the entire Universe in gamma rays before fading to oblivion." The short burst are of some two seconds duration whilst the longer bursts may extend to some 1000 seconds duration. It may then be hypothesized that the shorter bursts reveal the signature of universe formation whilst the larger are of the quous type of formation of various cosmic configurations originating from the zeroth energy level having initial origin, therefore, from quantal disturbances there as predicted by Zeldovich in his classic derivation from quantum mechanics. Since there is no time space orientation exterior to this universe, all of these energies due to gamma ray bursts are isotropically and iscochronically presented to those viewers within the inertial frame of our universe. Hypernova as now observed would therefore have origin in these higher energy levels it is here postulated.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

May we thank one and all for your kind actions in this tragic concern.

The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, RHIC, at Broohaven National Laboratory in Long Island is now ramping up to higher energy levels. Any suggestions regarding email addresses to whom notices regarding public endangerment from high-energy physics experimentation should be forwarded to at the Brookhaven facility would be most welcome at this time.

An additional footnote in this regard regarding gamma rays bursts may be of interest. There are also in observational astronomy soft gamma-ray bursters which are thought to have origin in glitches in the rotational equlibrium of neutron stars. This produces pulses of soft gamma-rays bursts which are in the MeV range.

Since these bursts are not observed at cosmological distances, and are of only moderate energetics, they are excluded from those postulations given in the preceeding post.

All the children will thank you for your efforts on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls !

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
attacks on Paul?

Why you guys attacking Paul?

He doesn't sneak on here, he lives in freaking hawaii, that's why his posts are always very late or very early morning.

What's interesting is that no one has been able to either logically or scientifically gainsay him.

Some of the arguments I've heard here are laughable.

example, "Paul can't be right because he sneaks on here when nobody's on line."

"Paul can't be right because I can't find the increase in energy levels that he has found."

"Paul can't be right because I don't know enough about physics to understand what he's talking about."

"Paul can't be right because those Fermi scientists would not do any experiments that would endanger us."

"Paul can't be right becuase his PhD is in psych not physics."

Paul has valid concerns that he has consistently backed up with peer reviewed journal publications and scientific reports.

None, NOT ONE, of his opponents has been able to do this.

I think that it's very possible that those scientists at Fermi could do something stupid with drastic consequences.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top