Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Most cordial thanks to paulsamuels for his welcome and timely assistance in this tragic concern. What follows is an accounting of the government response to safety issues before the last flight of the Columbia space shuttle.

"Fears of a catastrophic shuttle accident were raised last summer with the White House by a former NASA engineer who pleaded for a presidential order to halt all further shuttle flights until safety issues had been addressed. In a letter to the White House, Don Nelson who served with NASA for 36 years until he retired in 1999 wrote to President George W. Bush warning that
'intervention' was necessary to prevent another catastrophic space shuttle accident."

"During the last 11 years at Nasa, Nelson served as mission operation evaluator for proposed advanced space transportation projects. He was on the initial design team for the space shuttle. He participated in every shuttle upgrade until his retirement." (The Guardian, Front page, Nasa chiefs 'repeatedly ignored' safety warnings, Peter Beaumont Sunday February 2 2003, The Observer)

The point may be well taken that government officials may be indifferent to safety concerns. In the case of high-energy physics, the loss of life due to a laboratory mischance will encompass all mankind in one final awful catastrophe!

All the children will thank you for most kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

Every Best Wish,

Yours sincerely.

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentaton
 
Last edited:
i like mr dixon. i am not qualified to comment on his posts. i however think his form letter style of posting is funnier than shit.



;)
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Ok I just read an ungodly amount of that thread... and I must ay Paul W. Dixon is full of it. He makes numerous physics mistakes in his numbers, and manages to pull 'quotes' that no one else can find in his alleged source.

I have a feling that he's an old guy who happens to live near the FERMILAB and his windows shake or something when they turn the generators on.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your prompt and effective actions in this most vital concern.

The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York is ramping up to 4.0E28 luminosity in order to create a sample of the quark gluon plasma present at the time of the origin of the Universe. This is clearly a point in energetics which bears on relativisitic cosmology and may then create a transition towards the high-energy condition termed de Sitter space yielding a Type !a supernova.

This is another exemplar of how our experimenation, which is at the limits of our technological expertise, may threaten the existence of all mankind. A timely warning is therefore in order in this connection also.

A reading in the History of Science in high-energy physics experimentation particularly in the recounting of the number of disasters concurrent with this line of research may be helpful in this regard.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this tragic concern.

A review of the Accelerator Update at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory indicates that by the middle of next week the Tevatron will again be imperiling all our lives with further collider trials. Please contact the staff at Fermilab and indicate your opinion of this continued plunge into the unknown before this continuing tragic work has commenced once again.

The experimenters at the Relativistc Heavy Ion Collier
at the Brookahven National Laboratory have been contacted with information regarding Type Ia Supernova generation via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space. As the goal of their research is to form a quark gluon plasma as found at the time of the point origin of our universe, it is clear that these energies are significant in terms of relativistic cosmology.

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
I have read all of the above posts (or most of them, some were just too boring)

My only comment: Paul is -let me think of a kind word- out to lunch.

And I will give 20 points to Crisp for his patient rebutal, which was well thought out and scientiffically and mathematically correct.

Thanks Crisp, I'm looking forward to other threads you might start or comment on.

M.J.
 
Paul, I was wondering what you have your PhD in? Farming? Sorry about the sarcasm, but as an astrophysicist myself I can tell you that the energy released during a supernova is on the order of 10^12 joules. I think it unlikely that a beam consisting of a few hundred thousand protons is going to come close to that. The energy densities you require for conversion to a de Sitter space is almost certainly on the order of the Planck scale and we are nowhere near that in terms of time, distance, or energy.

George
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

All thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.

The energies now achieved in the collisional focus of Fermilab, CERN and also the Relativisitic Heavy Ion Collider are those found at the point origin of the Universe. This is well known and what has been carried out during the recent downtime at Fermilab is to focus these energies more accurately with a technological upgrade. With this improved focus in the nanometer range, the probability of creating is a transition toward de Sitter space is greater via forming a breach in the classically defined potential barrier toward de Sitter space. These collisional interactions are now in the range of 17.3E30 luminosity and with energies close to 2 TeV at Fermilab. It is then the vast energies resident in de Sitter space which provide for the immense explosion of a Type Ia Supernova under this postulation.

All of these factors are well-known in modern science; it only requires the opening of ones eyes a little wider to allow all of these factors entrance into consciousness simultaneously to comprehend the central postulates of this paradigm.

All of the children will thank you for kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

PRAY FOR PEACE

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOV FROM EXPERIMENTATIONFROM AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTAITON AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this tragic concern.

The energetics now underway at Fermilab are at some 20E30 luminosity at almost 2 TeV for the collisional interaction while that at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider is at the luminosity stage of 7E27. These values are of moderate energetics for Run II at Fermilab and the RHIC yet in the sense of cosmological energies stochastic effects from these energy levels may yet trigger a transition towards de Sitter space. May it, therefore, be very respectully requested that a moratorium be promulgated on these highest-energy physics experiments at this time. We may recall in this connection the moratorium request to NASA regarding the Columbia and other space shuttle flights.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

PRAY FOR PEACE

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Does the discussion in the Physics and Math forum on moving unsupported science threads to pseudoscience apply to all Science forums, or just that one?
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to one and all of your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

The current energetics at Fermilab are again at a very high level with some 32.0E30 luminosity at nearly 2 TeV. The chances of forming a transition towards de Sitter space are increased due to the technical upgrade in the CDF at Fermilab carried out during the early part of this year. The forces in de Sitter space would then produce a Type Ia Supernova under this postulation by breaching the classically defined potgential barrier towards de Sitter space inthe Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed.

Please review those references on page 1 of this thread. A recent discussant, paulsamuels, pointed out that these references are from peer-reviewed journals. The primary references are from the journal, Nature, which has the highest reputation in world of modern science.

All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
All the children will thank you
Who's children? All is a hell of alot of kids

and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
What did I do?
 
and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul do you mean Allah?

I still think this should be in Pseudoscience!

:(
 
If they were going to move this they would have done it 2 years ago
 
Paul's area of expertise is in psychology supposedly.

And given the method of his posts, and the reactions beyond the debunkers' replies...

I'd suggest moving this to Human Science, as it is a blatent, much overdone psychology experiment.

Take the data, write your paper, and move on, Paul.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENATION AT FERMILAB

May we thank everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

Please take a moment and review the article by Malcolm J. Perry in the Theoretical Physics section of the journal Nature. This is entitled, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? (Nature, 320, 24 April 1986, p. 679). Within the context of relativistic cosmology, only a potential barrier protects our Universe from an intrusioal event from de Sitter space. Penetrance through a classically defined potential barrier is only a function of energy. Those energies now produced in the CDF at Fermilab, as previously indicated, are close to those found at the point origin of this universe. We are, therefore, risking everyone's lives in this reckless plunge into the unkown via high-energy physics experimentation. These most terrible risks in experimental science are clearly evidenced in the last flight of the Challenger and Columbia space shuttles.

All the children will thank you for your actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Paul W. Dixon

Happy belated anniversary!

As of Feb. 28/03, you’ve kept this thread alive for 2 years.

And guess what, we’re all still alive too! Will that thing ever blow?
 
reply to Jaxom

I wouldn't doubt that this is an experiment in psychology. I have a friend in Paul Dixon's department at UH Hilo. I'll ask him and get back to you, if you're interested.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATON AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to one and all for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

So far these notices, please note the earlier presentation of our picketing at Fermilab in this thread, have continued since 1975.

The result of this work has been to maintain current energetics at Fermilab at some 1.8 TeV with variation in luminosity close to that used during Run I at Fermilab. Continuous effort has, of course, been required in order to maintain the flow of information to those enaged in high-energy physics experimentation.

The response of those familiar with relativistic cosmology has been a kind of, "sad but true," wry agreement that, alas, research at this level of energetics does have these inherent risks but the researchers need: 1. Employment 2. Philosophical freedom to pursue truth via high-energy physics experimentation.

My colleagues, as shown in the above mentioned photograph of our picketing at Fermilab, objected to this most strongly saying this was an extremely selfish action on their part since they put everyone's lives at risk by this research.

All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph. D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top