Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab
- Thread starter Paul W. Dixon
- Start date
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
With the current energetics of the CDC at Fermilab at 30E30 + luminosity and with some 2TeV as the operating energy, stochastic effects as well as quantum tunneling may also add to the generally increased probability of forming a transition toward de Sitter space with increased luminosity. Thus the transition toward de Sitter space may occur at any time with no prior warning. Type Ia supernovae evidence some 7 billion solar luminosities and outshine their galaxy of origination for some several weeks. It is, therefore, in the best interst of all mankind to have these experiments terminated until the
threshold of this transition toward de Sitter space has been ascertained via computer modeling and through increased knowledge of relativistic cosmology.
All the children will thank you now and for all time for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.
Every Best Wish,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
With the current energetics of the CDC at Fermilab at 30E30 + luminosity and with some 2TeV as the operating energy, stochastic effects as well as quantum tunneling may also add to the generally increased probability of forming a transition toward de Sitter space with increased luminosity. Thus the transition toward de Sitter space may occur at any time with no prior warning. Type Ia supernovae evidence some 7 billion solar luminosities and outshine their galaxy of origination for some several weeks. It is, therefore, in the best interst of all mankind to have these experiments terminated until the
threshold of this transition toward de Sitter space has been ascertained via computer modeling and through increased knowledge of relativistic cosmology.
All the children will thank you now and for all time for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.
Every Best Wish,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Tetraneutron
Registered Member
Interesting post, however a complete work of fiction as I know Professor Dixon and he doesn't post here, well not under his real name anyway.
T.
T.
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks to everyone for their kind actions in this most tragic concern.
In the context of a sciforum, we may recall that Copernican theory encountered the most violent opposition from the Inquisition and relativity from the Nazis. (Stephen Hawking (2002) in On the Shoulders of Giants, www.runningpress.com Page IX)
Relativistic cosmology is still not acceptable in our modern culture since our thinking is still essentially Newtonian in a culture largely derived from British historical antecedents. The laws of physics are none-the-less explicit in regard to supernova generation via the formation of a transition toward de Sitter space due to experimentation in high-energy physics. This conclusion may not be well-received due the very real hazards involved.
All the children will thank you for your most prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks to everyone for their kind actions in this most tragic concern.
In the context of a sciforum, we may recall that Copernican theory encountered the most violent opposition from the Inquisition and relativity from the Nazis. (Stephen Hawking (2002) in On the Shoulders of Giants, www.runningpress.com Page IX)
Relativistic cosmology is still not acceptable in our modern culture since our thinking is still essentially Newtonian in a culture largely derived from British historical antecedents. The laws of physics are none-the-less explicit in regard to supernova generation via the formation of a transition toward de Sitter space due to experimentation in high-energy physics. This conclusion may not be well-received due the very real hazards involved.
All the children will thank you for your most prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Last edited:
You know, what baffles me is that D(iminished) R(esponsibility) Dixon posts here and does not mail Fermilab. I mean, come on, what wieght have we got with the people at Fermilab. Do they read Pauls' missives then walk away muttering darkly that they have been rumbled but continue anyway. Nope.
Not one electron of Pauls' stored text will make an iota of difference to anything.
Wish I could find it again but there was a photo of Paul demonstrating outside Fermilab something like a decade ago. He's a lone crusader.
Not one electron of Pauls' stored text will make an iota of difference to anything.
Wish I could find it again but there was a photo of Paul demonstrating outside Fermilab something like a decade ago. He's a lone crusader.
![FermiNews98-06-19[1]_05_0001.jpg](http://www.o-t.us/upload/guest/FermiNews98-06-19[1]_05_0001.jpg)
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVAE FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
The energies now employed at Fermilab in the highest energy physics facility on the planet are those found some trillionths of a second after the point origin the universe. The extent of these energies coupled with the stochastic effects and quantum tunnelling in large measure already meet the requirements for forming a transition to the highest energy condition of de Sitter space. It must, therefore, be only a function of continuous time of operation and increased luminosity with these values of 30E30 + luminosity with some 2TeV at the CDF in Fermilab that will generate a Type Ia supernova. High energy physics is an experimental science and the final result of these experiments is not known in advance. In the sense of this postulation, these effects combined with the oscillatory actions and precession of the pencil-shaped mass of particles and antiparticles in collision are analagous to a key seeking, over time, to open the potential barrier toward de Sitter space.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
The energies now employed at Fermilab in the highest energy physics facility on the planet are those found some trillionths of a second after the point origin the universe. The extent of these energies coupled with the stochastic effects and quantum tunnelling in large measure already meet the requirements for forming a transition to the highest energy condition of de Sitter space. It must, therefore, be only a function of continuous time of operation and increased luminosity with these values of 30E30 + luminosity with some 2TeV at the CDF in Fermilab that will generate a Type Ia supernova. High energy physics is an experimental science and the final result of these experiments is not known in advance. In the sense of this postulation, these effects combined with the oscillatory actions and precession of the pencil-shaped mass of particles and antiparticles in collision are analagous to a key seeking, over time, to open the potential barrier toward de Sitter space.
All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Last edited:
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks for everyone's most kind efforts in this most tragic concern.
Statistically the problem lies in that there has been no observed supernova in our galaxy since 1604, which is the year that Kepler observed the last known supernova within our galaxy. The chances for this, according to current theories, is less thatn 6 x 10 to the - 4 power (p < .001). Some 10 supernovae should have been observed in this time frame with a mean rate of supernovae production of 2.5 per century. Evidence may be found that certain gamma - ray emissions at 1.157 MeV are evidence of faint supernova that may have been too faint in the optical wavelengths for observation during this historical period.
(A Iyudin, G. Lichti, MPE Jahresbericht 1998 - Kapitel 3 (Be...port 1998 - Chapter 3 (Contribution 4))
Yet there is still the statistical likelihood of a Type Ia supernova in this sampling of supernovae during this time frame from 1604 to the present since the instrinsic luminosity of a Type Ia supernova would have permitted observation in the optical wavelengths. In a general statistical sense, therefore, it may be tenatively concluded that a Type Ia supernova is perhaps overdue in our galaxy. Let us, therefore continue with these efforts at Fermilab and elsewhere to extend this time of life for everyone.
All of the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks for everyone's most kind efforts in this most tragic concern.
Statistically the problem lies in that there has been no observed supernova in our galaxy since 1604, which is the year that Kepler observed the last known supernova within our galaxy. The chances for this, according to current theories, is less thatn 6 x 10 to the - 4 power (p < .001). Some 10 supernovae should have been observed in this time frame with a mean rate of supernovae production of 2.5 per century. Evidence may be found that certain gamma - ray emissions at 1.157 MeV are evidence of faint supernova that may have been too faint in the optical wavelengths for observation during this historical period.
(A Iyudin, G. Lichti, MPE Jahresbericht 1998 - Kapitel 3 (Be...port 1998 - Chapter 3 (Contribution 4))
Yet there is still the statistical likelihood of a Type Ia supernova in this sampling of supernovae during this time frame from 1604 to the present since the instrinsic luminosity of a Type Ia supernova would have permitted observation in the optical wavelengths. In a general statistical sense, therefore, it may be tenatively concluded that a Type Ia supernova is perhaps overdue in our galaxy. Let us, therefore continue with these efforts at Fermilab and elsewhere to extend this time of life for everyone.
All of the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
All Best Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Last edited:
Re: SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
You'd really be better off shutting your mouth, and opening your eyes and ears for a change.
- Warren
What has this to do with anything you've ever said before? You've been quite specific that the Tevatron was going to create a type Ia supernova at literally every incremental step in collision energy for years now. Now you're talking about real supernovae, in stars?
So let me get this straight: there is a known probability of a supernova occuring in a certain period of time in our galaxy. As it's been a while, we're "overdue" for one, and therefore it's going to happen at Fermilab? What the fuck are you smoking?
You'd really be better off shutting your mouth, and opening your eyes and ears for a change.
- Warren
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
As can be seen in theoretical physics in the journal Nature, in the article of Malcolm J. Perry entitled, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? Nature Vol. 320, 24 April 1986, p.679, only a large potential barrier protects us from the high-energy condition of de Sitter space. With sufficient energy in the Tevatron at Fermilab, it is then predicted, under this postulation, that this potential barrier would be overcome thus producing a Type Ia supernova.
In the Biblical reference we note: Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin (You have been weighed in the balance and found wanting). Or in a more modern reference in the translation by Edward Fitzgerald of the Rubaiyat of Omar Kayyam:
The Moving Finger writes; and having writ,
Moves on: nor all your Piety and Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all your tears wash out a Word of it.
It is essential, therefore, that we review the predictions from relativistic cosmology before plunging to our doom via high-energy physics experimentation.
All the chidren will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf, and may the good God have mercy our souls!
Every Best Wish,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many, many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
As can be seen in theoretical physics in the journal Nature, in the article of Malcolm J. Perry entitled, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? Nature Vol. 320, 24 April 1986, p.679, only a large potential barrier protects us from the high-energy condition of de Sitter space. With sufficient energy in the Tevatron at Fermilab, it is then predicted, under this postulation, that this potential barrier would be overcome thus producing a Type Ia supernova.
In the Biblical reference we note: Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin (You have been weighed in the balance and found wanting). Or in a more modern reference in the translation by Edward Fitzgerald of the Rubaiyat of Omar Kayyam:
The Moving Finger writes; and having writ,
Moves on: nor all your Piety and Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all your tears wash out a Word of it.
It is essential, therefore, that we review the predictions from relativistic cosmology before plunging to our doom via high-energy physics experimentation.
All the chidren will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf, and may the good God have mercy our souls!
Every Best Wish,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Last edited: