Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
You need to actually address this, or else you really are just trolling.
To reiterate↑:
Technically, the letter of the law does prohibit such harassment, except the loophole is to say it isn't harassment.
Your response↑ skipped over that point.
I'll say this slower this time:
The law doesn't tell you what you CAN do, it tells you what you CAN'T do! Do you understand that point? Please directly answer and respond to this very point, otherwise you are the troll (with access to a ban button). Let me guess, you want to push that button on me, right? So the conversation will not include me, and the discussion can continue like you want it to? Respond or you are a TROLL!
Since then, you have been reiterating that there is no law, therefore no crime.
Right!! Because, well, there is no law, so I keep saying it and you keep ignoring it.??
Again, respond or you are a troll.
Your trolling, belligerent posts have the glaring flaw of being cowardly for refusing to acknowledge the obvious point.
What point do I refuse to acknowledge, SPECIFICALLY? Respond or you are a troll.
Consider it this way: Rape is against the law.
Right. What is the reason you now want to talk about an act of breaking a law?
Respond, or as usual, you are a troll.
The loophole is to argue that "she was asking for it", say, according to what she was wearing. You know, like a bikini or short skirt in Florida during the summer. And I use Florida as an example because yes, it is possible to convince a jury to acquit on those grounds. Or there is also Colorado, where refusing to prosecute a confessed rape on the grounds that the victim deserved it earns one a ticket to Congress.
Why are you talking about loopholes again? What is the loophole out of an act on the street that there is no law against doing? Being arrested?
I hate to keep saying it, but...ROYAAT.
And it works both ways. To wit, in South Carolina, one has the right to defend themselves in their home under what is known as Castle Doctrine. The way to make self-defense in the home illegal is to argue in court that the law was never intended to apply to women defending themselves against domestic abuse.
I guess you need to ask the law makers why they wrote stupid laws??
ROYAAT
Remember?
Yup.
ROYAAT
Word games?
Yup.
ROYAAT!!!!!
Last edited: