if
Actually, I have backed it up, many times now. Your refusal to acknowledge fact and reality really isn’t my problem. I have questioned the veracity of the video and the struggling young actress who starred it for all the many reasons previously and repeatedly stated whereas you mindlessly accept the video and the words of this young actress as gospel truth without question. You regard the video and this struggling young actress as sacrosanct. In your view, it cannot be questioned as it is gospel. And I have also repeatedly stated that neither you nor I know the veracity of the video and the struggling young actress who starred it. We only have their word that they are truthful. Well, given all the reasons I have repeatedly stated, that isn't sufficient proof. There are significant motivations for the makers of this video to lie and I have previously spelled out those motivations.
What you have repeatedly done is to pretend facts do not exist. You have used a host of fallacies. You have accused me of taking positions and of saying things I didn’t’ say or even hint at. You have repeatedly lied. Unfortunately for you, I am not going to defend positions I do not take or subscribe to just to make you feel better. You stepped in it, now live with it.
I answered every legitimate question you asked. You just didn’t like the answers. The questions I didn’t answer were not related to our discussion or my position which was and remains the basis for this discourse. I didn’t answer your questions about specific words which used would constitute harassment, because frankly the question is infantile and pointless. There are no specific words which if used would constitute harassment. Women, men, my dogs, can all be harassed without words or with any words, context and perception is everything. So to engage in an argument about what words which if used constitute harassment is just silly and pointless. It is quite frankly infantile. It isn’t my cup of tea and it has nothing to do with the subject of our discussion.
Given some people are denser than others; I will repeat myself one more time for your edification. I question the veracity of the video in question for all the reasons previously stated. That doesn’t mean that sexual harassment doesn’t occur. That doesn’t mean that sexual harassment should be condoned. I have said and will say once again for your edification, that harassment of any kind should not be condoned, sexual or otherwise, be it with words or with gestures.
What you need to do James is be honest or quit. You also might want to brush up on forum rules.
joepistole,
This is the second (or is it the third?) time you've made that claim, and the second time you've utterly failed to back it up with anything at all.
Actually, I have backed it up, many times now. Your refusal to acknowledge fact and reality really isn’t my problem. I have questioned the veracity of the video and the struggling young actress who starred it for all the many reasons previously and repeatedly stated whereas you mindlessly accept the video and the words of this young actress as gospel truth without question. You regard the video and this struggling young actress as sacrosanct. In your view, it cannot be questioned as it is gospel. And I have also repeatedly stated that neither you nor I know the veracity of the video and the struggling young actress who starred it. We only have their word that they are truthful. Well, given all the reasons I have repeatedly stated, that isn't sufficient proof. There are significant motivations for the makers of this video to lie and I have previously spelled out those motivations.
What you have repeatedly done is to pretend facts do not exist. You have used a host of fallacies. You have accused me of taking positions and of saying things I didn’t’ say or even hint at. You have repeatedly lied. Unfortunately for you, I am not going to defend positions I do not take or subscribe to just to make you feel better. You stepped in it, now live with it.
This isn’t about homeruns.Want to try for the home run?
Actually no, I am avoiding nothing and from my perspective there is no reason to bluff anything. From my perspective, this is really quite simple and straight forward. You on the other hand have a lot to be defensive about. You have repeatedly engaged in a host of deceptions, lies and fallacies. I suspect that is why we are still having this discussion. You have offered nothing but more deception, which is generally considered a defensive tactic friend. The plain and simple fact is I question the veracity of this video and the struggling actress who starred in it. You do not. You have taken offense that the veracity of the video and actress even be questioned even though you have no proofs, only their claims. And the truth is as I have stated from the onset and repeated with almost every post, that neither you nor I know if the video and actress in question were truthful. If you were not defensive, you could be honest…something you have yet to be, something you probably cannot be.You're the guy with the avoidance problem. I ask you uncomfortable questions; you avoid. That's how it has gone. I mean, I understand why you're defensive, but you can't bluff through this. You need to either call it quits or pony up.
I answered every legitimate question you asked. You just didn’t like the answers. The questions I didn’t answer were not related to our discussion or my position which was and remains the basis for this discourse. I didn’t answer your questions about specific words which used would constitute harassment, because frankly the question is infantile and pointless. There are no specific words which if used would constitute harassment. Women, men, my dogs, can all be harassed without words or with any words, context and perception is everything. So to engage in an argument about what words which if used constitute harassment is just silly and pointless. It is quite frankly infantile. It isn’t my cup of tea and it has nothing to do with the subject of our discussion.
Given some people are denser than others; I will repeat myself one more time for your edification. I question the veracity of the video in question for all the reasons previously stated. That doesn’t mean that sexual harassment doesn’t occur. That doesn’t mean that sexual harassment should be condoned. I have said and will say once again for your edification, that harassment of any kind should not be condoned, sexual or otherwise, be it with words or with gestures.
What you need to do James is be honest or quit. You also might want to brush up on forum rules.
Last edited: