Are you suggesting that you'll only answer a question is someone proves tpo you that the answer is imoortant to them ?
Someone? I mean you.
I'm suggesting why engage in futility, you?
Are you suggesting that you'll only answer a question is someone proves tpo you that the answer is imoortant to them ?
Someone? I mean you.
I'm suggesting why engage in futility, you?
That's right I'm being evasive.
Evading a futile discussion with you.
And the whole world knows why. Your reputation for arrogance, unsupported statements and ignoring facts is growing on this site. Ask around !
And the whole world knows why. Your reputation for arrogance, unsupported statements and ignoring facts is growing on this site. Ask around !
Arrogance is what this forum seems to be made of.
In any case avoiding futility isn't arrogant it's logical. Your Hissy Fit Thread in the Site Feedback reiterates that you have a severe lack of perspective of just about everything. You lack self control and have demonstrated your weakeness on numerous occasions. You have a personality conflict with me. I'm not going to fight someone as dense as a brick wall. What would be the point. I allow your flawed human instincts to draw the rope that hangs you. There is no effort on my part and I'm entertained at the same time.
You're a waste of time, Miles. If that time is to be wasted I prefer to do so on my terms.
I thought this was Sciforums?...not Dawsons Creek....Oh well:shrug:
Nothing to be learned if god hadn't made a mess in the first place and then conveniently blamed it on others.He had a second try when he sent the deluge but he still didn't get it right. So now he's trying again. It's about time he realized his limitations and gave up.
If the choice is imperative to the plan they had no choice, God wanted it that way, so that's the way it had to be.
Don't take it personaly, it's just a frank analysis of obvious aberrant behavior.
You ask
I give.
Yes, Theres nothing like a stalker to make things intresting.
You mean a deerstalker, Sherlock.
Do I take it personally ? You are joking, I take it.Some of your better efforts
Matthew begins with the word history...look and see what you said to three of us who said you were wrong, You weaseled oue later by saying you equated history with genealogy, Remember your copy of the bible which differed fro the St James' version, the Vulgate and the Greek NT ? You never diid reveal your source because......
Then you claim Darwin said monkeys mutate into men, When asked for a source, you resorted to personal abuse.
Next, you suggest evolution does nothing.
Jesus did't work on the sabbath, ergo his creation is not finished, ergo that explains evolution, which according to you does nothing. That also explains why the seven days mentioned in Genesis must not be taken literally.
You have posted lots more of the same rubbish and still expect to be taken seriously. So you know what you can do with your analysis. It carries as much weight as your other crap. You show not the slightest sign of scholarship in what you write and get stroppy when you are contradicted.
I will leave it at that. Don't expect a response to your next tirade.
god wanted them to have a choice, and they made it. why can't it be both ways? he just knew what they would choose before they chose it because he's omniscient and omnipresent, and all that jazz.
Lori, is there any specific information you've seen that implies God is omnipresent.
I ask because my study of the bible shows that he has a specific location.
Yorda seems to be drawing similar conclusions as yourself.