do you think there is science behind god too?
this is an interesting question...
i think there is a reason and an explanation for everything, whether we know what it is or not. so yeah...
do you think there is science behind god too?
law. everything that exists and happens does so according to some law...
natural, physical, chemical, biological, spiritual...it's all law.
That's the illusion. Once the knowledge exists of what you will do then you become powerless to do anything other than those actions - you no longer have a free choice.listen, i don't know what you're trippin' on, but if you moved forward in time, saw my decision made before i made it. came back and did not interfere with my free will to make that decision or influence me in my decision making, then i own that decision, and you didn't have a damn thing to do with it, obviously.
If not going to hell is in people's best interest but they still decide to go to hell then they clearly have not been appropriately informed. A truly omnipotent god would be able to provide the appropriate education if he really had our best interests in mind. In which case no one would ever choose hell. Since you think they do and God could have prevented that then he cannot have their best interests in mind.you are talking about taking away people's free will, and that is not in our best interest. people choose to be in hell. take a look around man...
i have no understanding of why it is that some people think that just because they haven't experienced something themselves, that it just doesn't happen. i'm not like that. why would i assume that i've experienced all there is, or that i know all there is? and if someone else tells me about an experience they had that i have never had, i don't argue with them and tell them they didn't have it. that's just preposterous!
he's actually setting us up to win. to be invincible. he is teaching us how to live forever. everything in the universe is a duality. everything is a choice or has an opposite.
the only thing you have to do to experience or know god is to want to, so the people who haven't, haven't really wanted to.
lori,
That's the illusion. Once the knowledge exists of what you will do then you become powerless to do anything other than those actions - you no longer have a free choice.
Lori,
If not going to hell is in people's best interest but they still decide to go to hell then they clearly have not been appropriately informed. A truly omnipotent god would be able to provide the appropriate education if he really had our best interests in mind. In which case no one would ever choose hell. Since you think they do and God could have prevented that then he cannot have their best interests in mind.
And yet you keep doing precisely this. To wit:
Let's give this a bit of a psychological analysis, with some background:
1. A person has done something they feel bad about.
2. The person desperately wants to feel good and worthy again.
3. The person turns to their own sense of ethics, or to other people, or to religions and philosophies to find a way to feel good and worthy again.
4. After some unsatisfactory search, they find Christianity, the Bible. There, they see a way to feel good and worthy again.
5. But in order to do so, they need to believe in God.
6. They try and they try to believe in God, and at first, it amounts to nothing, no sign from God. They think "Uh, so what ..."
7. They still feel pressured by the wrongdoing (1) that set them on this search. They want to feel good and worthy again.
8. They go back to seeking God. They read or are told that all it takes to believe in God or to know God is to simply want to do so, to be humble, pure and sincere.
9. They endure, they pray, they want to believe in God - but still, no sign or proof of God. The old wrongdoing burns them, and they want to feel good and worthy again. They want to think of themselves that they are a basically good person, they want to move on with their life. They want to think of themselves as humble, sincere and pure. They don't want to be liars.
10. They are facing the dilemma: They can either continue thinking themselves evil, insincere, worthless and remain stuck in life. Or they can declare they believe in God. - For if a person believes in God, this is proof that they have been humble, sincere and pure.
11. In time, the dilemma becomes more and more demanding, causing a lot of strain. The person is by now under great psychological stress, possibly also with intense physical symptoms. The person wants, more than ever, to feel good and worthy again. By now the only way to achieve this seems to be to believe in God - that is, to declare they believe in God, because they still have no sign or proof of God.
12. In a critical moment, the stress becomes too great, and the person resolves it by declaring they believe in God. They reinterpret their life experiences accordingly, so that they appear to be proof of God's existence.
They regain their sense of self-worth, and they begin to feel good and worthy again, they deem themselves humble, sincere and pure.
13. To maintain this state of well-being, they need to continue to pray, read the Bible and discuss their belief in God with other people, in order to stifle any doubt or suspicion they themselves might have.
- This, I think, is the most likely scenario for arriving at belief in God, aside from childhood conditioning and cultist manipulation.
People have the innate desire to feel good about themselves, and in order to do so, they are willing to lie, steal, kill, misinterpret, falsely accuse, manipulate, destroy anyone and anything, depending on what their particular circumstances are.
I think many theists underestimate this innate desire to feel good about oneself.
i think god wanted everything to be all fudged.
he wanted us to know good and evil so we can learn to make better choices, if we so choose.
the way i see it, is that the only way we can ever live eternally, is if the entire human race chooses of their own free will to do the right thing all the time.
doing what?
Lori_7 said:i have no understanding of why it is that some people think that just because they haven't experienced something themselves, that it just doesn't happen. i'm not like that. why would i assume that i've experienced all there is, or that i know all there is? and if someone else tells me about an experience they had that i have never had, i don't argue with them and tell them they didn't have it. that's just preposterous!
Lori_7 said:he's actually setting us up to win. to be invincible. he is teaching us how to live forever. everything in the universe is a duality. everything is a choice or has an opposite.
yes, you just described a liar. this is not my experience at all, and i have no idea how people live this way, or why they would even try to. see, this sign or proof that you're referring to...god has given that to me. and all i did was ask for it sincerely. for someone to say that they believe without it is a liar.
I think your poinrt is well made. The notion of forgiveness is a very powerful antidote to guilt.
Then the blame lies solely in one place: That god.
And, (if we were to argue that everyone has an innate understanding of right and wrong as theists so love to state), then he still could have simply created Bob and Jane and had two individuals who knew right and wrong and chose to do right. The result: Nobody burns for eternity.
So, just create Bob and Jane instead. But then, you did say earlier he wanted everything to be fudged, so therefore you're ultimately saying god doesn't want us to live eternally.
Doing what I quoted that you said you are not doing:
You say you are not like that - you say that you do not assume that you have experienced all there is, or that you know all there is.
Yet you say also:
Only someone who assumes to have experienced it or known it all would say something like that.
What I described above in the 13 steps is not lying; it is a description of what can happen to a person under durress when a mixture of psychological defense mechanisms, especially denial and compensation take over and lead the person to think and act in a particular way - while the person is completely unaware of those defense mechanisms and convinced she is being honest and sincere.
And until you understand such processes, I am afraid you will not understand how come some people do not believe in God, and much less will you be able to reach through to others about what it means to believe in God.
do we really need a god to forgive? or is it to determine why you feel guilty in the first place? to determine if you really did anything wrong? or if there is even such a thing as right or wrong, and if so, if it even matters which we choose?