It was you who mentioned my supposed penis, in spite of me never stating my gender, which lends credibility to my hypothesis about feminists suffering penis envy. If you want to dispute Freud's theory of penis envy, then fine, go ahead. However, my sexual organs have no bearing on feminists' propensity to interpret inanimate objects as phallic objects.
And it was you who brought up the gun is the extension of the gun analogy, coupled with Freud's penis envy, it basically means that your sex is irrelevant. What matters is the gun in your hand.
Oh, I'm sure there are gun owners out there with their own little complexes. What's more disturbing is feminists' propensity to disarm men, while then applauding women who shoot their unarmed spouse. And you want me to believe that that's the behaviour of someone who wants to protect and preserve life? Do you think the audience is stupid?
It is this inherent dishonesty that makes your post and your reasoning pathetic.
In labeling women and men who shoot their abusive partners as being people who simply killed unarmed spouses, you completely make the years of abuse irrelevant, as though it never even happened. You also completely ignore the psychological damage that occurs in such abusive relationships, not to mention the desperation that leads them to that final and unspeakable act. The "unarmed spouse", as you describe the abusive partner or spouse, is not innocent and it is their actions which has ultimately driven the other to commit such acts. You leave out how these men, women and their children fear for their safety in a system that is not designed to protect them before the fact, and instead, often leaves them at the hands of their abusers, who stalk, threaten them and their families if they leave or try to leave. Often these victims are pushed to the brink and the only way out they see where they will be free from violence is to kill the abuser.
And it is because of what led up to the victim taking a gun and ending their abuse in shooting their spouse, that you will often see the police not charge these victims and why they are often found not guilty.
In your zeal to attack feminists, you completely disregard those facts and that is what makes your arguments in general so ridiculous.
So no, it isn't always just the woman killing the "unarmed spouse" as he or she sleeps. Next time you want to use that kind of argument, go and google what happens to men and women who suffer a lifetime of abuse in a relationship. In short, get a bit of a clue first.
