So they are burning and looting in Baltimore tonight

It sounds like the legality of the knife is a matter of interpretation - here's the Baltimore City Code (Article 19, Subtitle 59, Section 19) "It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, carry, or possess any knife with an automatic spring or other device for opening and/or closing the blade, commonly known as a switch-blade knife,” - - .

So the knife is not the kind commonly known as a switch-blade, and the spring assists the hand in opening the knife rather than "automatically" opening it. Or so it could be argued, quite plausibly. That would appear to make it a legal possession.

Notice that all common folding knives - including the multitool devices one sees on the belts of tradesmen of all kinds, in Baltimore and everywhere else - are equipped with springs and cams and such to help hold them open or closed securely, and with many (such as my "Leatherman" tool) the spring does help snap the blade into position.

Not that the matter is particularly relevant, as no one is claiming the knife was a threat or other motive for either the arrest or the rough treatment of Mr. Gray.

But the police investigation found that the knife was illegal under Baltimore city code.
We have reason to mistrust the police in this matter, especially since they seem to be using this issue as chaff to deflect attention from the matter of their fellow officers's behavior.

A common tactic, used in every one of the recent such events we have seen hit the news.
 
Last edited:
It sounds like the legality of the knife is a matter of interpretation - here's the Baltimore City Code (Article 19, Subtitle 59, Section 19) "It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, carry, or possess any knife with an automatic spring or other device for opening and/or closing the blade, commonly known as a switch-blade knife,” - - .

So the knife is not the kind commonly known as a switch-blade, and the spring assists the hand in opening the knife rather than "automatically" opening it. Or so it could be argued, quite plausibly. That would appear to make it a legal possession.

Not that the matter is particularly relevant, as no one is claiming the knife was a threat or other motive for either the arrest or the rough treatment of Mr. Gray.

We have reason to mistrust the police in this matter, especially since they seem to be using this issue as chaff to deflect attention from the matter of their fellow officers's behavior.

A common tactic, used in every one of the recent such events we have seen hit the news.
more over the only reason they found it because they searched him with out cause.
 
Mosby.jpg


"The murder charges filed against the Baltimore officers who arrested Freddie Gray could be dropped, because the police investigation into his death doesn't support the prosecution's case, it's been reported."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...support-case-say-officials.html#ixzz3ZVNljv00

baltimore-state-attorney-marilyn-mosby-announces-police-officer.jpg
 
It sounds like the legality of the knife is a matter of interpretation - here's the Baltimore City Code (Article 19, Subtitle 59, Section 19) "It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, carry, or possess any knife with an automatic spring or other device for opening and/or closing the blade, commonly known as a switch-blade knife,” So the knife is not the kind commonly known as a switch-blade, and the spring assists the hand in opening the knife ... with many (such as my "Leatherman" tool) the spring does help snap the blade into position. ... We have reason to mistrust the police in this matter, especially since they seem to be using this issue as chaff to deflect attention from the matter of their fellow officers's behavior.
A common tactic, used in every one of the recent such events we have seen hit the news.{bold added by Billy T}
Yes all too common in use by police. Freddy was body searched with no justifying "probable cause" only because he was black. The blade of the knife found in his pocket was not under any spring force to open. It was in its normal zero-force" equilibrium closed position, unlike any switch blade or "automatic opening knife", with some lock restraining the blade from opening. The illegal in all 50 states knives have closed blade under constant opening force, that when unlocked throws the blade into the full open position. Freddy's knife does not have any blade lock - no need for a lock as there is no opening force on the blade. ONLY after the user exerts some opening force on the blade will a spring begin to assist in fully opening the blade. IT IS NOT AN ILLEGAL AUTOMATIC OPENING KNIFE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joepistoe refuted my statement that blacks were 21 times more like to be killed by police than whites were, despite making up less than 15% of the US population and asked for my source. Despite, as often is the case, Joe's rebutting "facts" are only pulled from his dark and smelly place. - For current on thread example, Joe gives his opinion that Freddy's knife was illegal, and when asked for quote of at least one state's code telling that, he can give none.
Codes are public - Not hard to find at least one. Iceaura gave Baltimore's "legal knife code" so if even one state does call Freddy's knife "illegal," Joe could quote it.
(Joe's ego is big. He never admits error or apologizes for putting words in someone's mouth. We should just take as truth whatever he pull from you know where.)

Unfortunately, it was CNN where I first heard that Blacks are 21 times more likely to be killed by police than white are. So I could not prove CNN said that, but accidently today found a quotable link - a video, saying the same thing, even also giving a bar chart with one bar 21 times taller than the other.
Entire video is good discussion of US (and especially the police) bias against blacks but the "Blacks are 21 times more likely to be killed by police" section of the video begins at 1:45 and ends at 1:55 minutes into this video: http://www.vox.com/2015/5/7/8568621/map-police-have-killed-at-least-1500-in-the-past-16-months

Video is slow to open (at least in Brazil) and entitled: "Why the police are rarely processed for using deadly force."

In general the video is very "pro-police." For example, notes that it does not matter if the deadly force was not justified. That the test of legality is what the police officer BELIEVED. If he believed his or another's life was in immediate danger, then killing someone (Blacks 21 times more than whites.) is not an abuse of authority.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re-expressing post 185 video's 1500 killed by police in terms of 21 blacks killed per white killed by police; that is 1432 blacks killed and 68 whites killed in last 16 months. Or:
Police kill 4.25 whites per month and 89.5 blacks per month, many are un armed men less than 26 years old, but of course some are armed criminals and an immediate danger to the police officer or others. Blacks are less than 15% of the population. China loves these facts and uses them very effectively in Africa.

Watch another video, China will show in Africa, here: http://news.yahoo.com/arrest-cop-kicking-black-man-signs-shift-prosecuting-174955849.html
New prosecutor re-opens clear case of police abuse, due to release of 2013 video (Showing police office kicking face of a black man complying with order to get down as soon as man gets to all fours, breaking his jaw.) First prosecutor and "JUSTIC SYSTEM" did nothing* two years ago. Things may be getter better, lets hope.
Baltimore's Marilyn Mosbe, prosecutor, seems to have set new standard for prosecutors: not to just accept what the solid-blue, silent, self-protecting line says, as fact.

* Not completely true. They fought ACLU's effort to force video release, but lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"The murder charges filed against the Baltimore officers who arrested Freddie Gray could be dropped, because the police investigation into his death doesn't support the prosecution's case, it's been reported."

The murder charges were a feint, designed to appease the ignorant and stupid. The prosecution overcharged the evidence knowing that conviction was unlikely for those charges. If it goes to trial, the cops get off and cannot be retried. If one thinks the cops guilty, then only an idiot or an ignoramus would find the action a cause for joy.

Some days, it seems that a total sham is the closest thing to something meaningful that this culture has to offer.
 
The murder charges were a feint, designed to appease the ignorant and stupid. The prosecution overcharged the evidence knowing that conviction was unlikely for those charges. If it goes to trial, the cops get off and cannot be retried.
The cops can be tried on multiple charges at the same time - it's common for prosecutors to pile charges on, with conviction likely for only the lesser ones, in ordinary cases. It acts as leverage for plea bargaining, for obtaining cooperation from minor or auxiliary offenders, etc.

The unusual feature is to see that tactic used against police officers, as if they were ordinary citizens. I doubt the Baltimore police are used to that.
 
... If it goes to trial, the cops get off and cannot be retried. ...
Lets not pre-judge the result, but wait for it. I lived seven years in Baltimore. Baltimore is an old port* city with large number of ethnic neighborhoods.
They get along together, with mutual respect, even pride in their diversity. I have faith in them to do what is right.

* Once a more important port than NYC, as it is about 300 miles closer to the heart land of the US - important when cargo moved more by wagon than by rail.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It was pointed out in today's Washington Post that across a three-mile distance (5km) between a concentration of Afro-American neighborhoods and a concentration of Euro-American neighborhoods in Baltimore, there is an 19-year difference in life expectancy. 15 Baltimore neighborhoods have a lower life expectancy than North Korea. Moreover, 8 neighborhoods have a lower life expectancy than Syria!

One of the major causes of early death in Baltimore's low-income areas is lead poisoning. When the city's economy collapsed in the "Rust Belt" phenomenon of the 1980s (because the U.S. manufacturing sector closed down their plants and moved them to China, where labor is cheaper), the value of many houses plummeted. When landlords were suddenly renting out houses for $250 per month or less, they didn't bother investing in them. Many of them have not been repaired or even inspected in 30 years. Therefore, even though lead paint has been outlawed for decades, these houses have not been repainted or improved in any other way, so they still have lead paint, which is a tremendous health hazard and a cause of early death.

Freddy Gray and his sister both had/have advanced symptoms of lead poisoning.
 
It was pointed out in today's Washington Post that across a three-mile distance (5km) between a concentration of Afro-American neighborhoods and a concentration of Euro-American neighborhoods in Baltimore, there is an 19-year difference in life expectancy. 15 Baltimore neighborhoods have a lower life expectancy than North Korea. Moreover, 8 neighborhoods have a lower life expectancy than Syria!

One of the major causes of early death in Baltimore's low-income areas is lead poisoning. When the city's economy collapsed in the "Rust Belt" phenomenon of the 1980s (because the U.S. manufacturing sector closed down their plants and moved them to China, where labor is cheaper), the value of many houses plummeted. When landlords were suddenly renting out houses for $250 per month or less, they didn't bother investing in them. Many of them have not been repaired or even inspected in 30 years. Therefore, even though lead paint has been outlawed for decades, these houses have not been repainted or improved in any other way, so they still have lead paint, which is a tremendous health hazard and a cause of early death.

Freddy Gray and his sister both had/have advanced symptoms of lead poisoning.
I think this mostly correct - When Bethlehem's large steel plant (third largest in the nation, I seem to recall) on the east side of the Harbor closed down and a few others did too, Baltimore ceased to be a "blue collar" town, but a town with growing low wages. I don't know as was there about 5 decades ago. Is the only "high tech" and big employer, The Martin aero/space plant on Middle River, still there / working?
 
Unfortunately, it was CNN where I first heard that Blacks are 21 times more likely to be killed by police than white are. So I could not prove CNN said that
Why not?

From CNN:

Syndicated columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote this week that young black men are 21 times more likely to be shot and killed by police than young white men. Fox News Channel host Bill O'Reilly had a much different take on his show Monday night, offering that more whites are killed by police than blacks.

"In 2012, 123 African-Americans were shot dead by police. There are currently more than 43 million blacks living in the U.S.A.," O'Reilly said on his program. "Same year, 326 whites were killed by police bullets. Those are the latest stats available."

Two dramatically different statistics -- and they could both be right.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/02/politics/kristoff-oreilly-police-shooting-numbers-fact-check/

You're welcome...
 
Why not?

From CNN:

Syndicated columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote this week that young black men are 21 times more likely to be shot and killed by police than young white men. Fox News Channel host Bill O'Reilly had a much different take on his show Monday night, offering that more whites are killed by police than blacks.

"In 2012, 123 African-Americans were shot dead by police. There are currently more than 43 million blacks living in the U.S.A.," O'Reilly said on his program. "Same year, 326 whites were killed by police bullets. Those are the latest stats available."

Two dramatically different statistics -- and they could both be right.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/02/politics/kristoff-oreilly-police-shooting-numbers-fact-check/

You're welcome...
Good Post Randwolf. the FBI study on which the 21 to 1 ratio is based on has some glaring holes in it. Some large states like Florida haven't reported for many years if not decades. So it really cannot be used to substantiate the number reported by ProPublica. Essentially the ProPublica numbers are worthless. The CDC is a much better source because it is more complete and it certainly doesn't rely on self reporting.

Per my previous post on this issue and Politifact citation, an analysis based on the CDC database, over a 19 year period, almost twice as many whites are killed by law enforcement than blacks. But when adjusted for population differences, blacks are 3 times (not 21 times) more likely to be killed by law enforcement than are whites. But that doesn't mean blacks are the victims of racism. In all likelihood, the rate differences are more related to class than race. The statistics also show blacks are more likely to be involved in crimes and therefore much more likely to have encounters with law enforcement. To state as some have, that just because blacks are more likely to be killed by law enforcement, it doesn't mean the cause is racism. People in lower social classes be they white or be they black are far more likely to be involved in crime and therefore far more likely to have fatal encounters with law enforcement.

http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/so...-baltimore-tonight.145828/page-8#post-3295550

From Politifact:

"Over the span of more than a decade, 2,151 whites died by being shot by police compared to 1,130 blacks. In that respect, Medved is correct.

However, Brian Forst, a professor in the Department of Justice, Law and Criminology at American University, said this difference is predictable.
"More whites are killed by the police than blacks primarily because whites outnumber blacks in the general population by more than five to one," Forst said. The country is about 63 percent white and 12 percent black.

Rather than comparing the raw numbers, you can look at the likelihood that a person will die due to "legal intervention" in the same way you might look at the chance a person will die in a car accident or a disease like lung cancer. When you do that, the numbers flip.
A 2002 study in the American Journal of Public Health found that the death rate due to legal intervention was more than three times higher for blacks than for whites in the period from 1988 to 1997. That is not the final story though. There are different theories as to why the black rate is so much higher.

Candace McCoy is a criminologist at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice at the City University of New York. McCoy said blacks might be more likely to have a violent encounter with police because they are convicted of felonies at a higher rate than whites. Felonies include everything from violent crimes like murder and rape, to property crimes like burglary and embezzlement, to drug trafficking and gun offenses.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that in 2004, state courts had over 1 million felony convictions. Of those, 59 percent were committed by whites and 38 percent by blacks. But when you factor in the population of whites and blacks, the felony rates stand at 330 per 100,000 for whites and 1,178 per 100,000 for blacks. That’s more than a three-fold difference.
McCoy noted that this has more to do with income than race. The felony rates for poor whites are similar to those of poor blacks.

"Felony crime is highly correlated with poverty, and race continues to be highly correlated with poverty in the USA," McCoy said. "It is the most difficult and searing problem in this whole mess."

On his website,Medved tried to link police killings with whether someone resisted arrest. "If you defer and don’t try to challenge a police officer, he may insult you but he won’t kill you," Medved said.

But criminologist Lorie Fridell at the University of South Florida told PunditFact that the research on this point is mixed. Some studies that factor in the level of resistance show that race doesn’t matter, and some show that it does." Politifact

While racism isn't dead, it probably never will be, you cannot legitimately attribute the cause for all woes to racism. We are not well served by blindly attributing every woe to racism. It's too easy to blame everything on racism. There are causes afoot here which go beyond racism.
 
Last edited:
Good Post Randwolf. the FBI study on which the 21 to 1 ratio is based on has some glaring holes in it. Some large states like Florida haven't reported for many years if not decades. So it really cannot be used to substantiate the number reported by ProPublica. Essentially the ProPublica numbers are worthless. The CDC is a much better source because it is more complete and it certainly doesn't rely on self reporting.

Per my previous post on this issue and Politifact citation, an analysis based on the CDC database, over a 19 year period, almost twice as many whites are killed by law enforcement than blacks. But when adjusted for population differences, blacks are 3 times (not 21 times) more likely to be killed by law enforcement than are whites. But that doesn't mean blacks are the victims of racism. In all likelihood, the rate differences are more related to class than race. The statistics also show blacks are more likely to be involved in crimes and therefore much more likely to have encounters with law enforcement. To state as some have, that just because blacks are more likely to be killed by law enforcement, it doesn't mean the cause is racism. People in lower social classes be they white or be they black are far more likely to be involved in crime and therefore far more likely to have fatal encounters with law enforcement.

http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/so...-baltimore-tonight.145828/page-8#post-3295550
actually the CDC statistics have some holes in them as well which is actually part of the problem. it contingent on catching every single death certificate, for those death certificates to be accurate. also the CDC numbers only include deaths by gun meaning people like freddie gray here won't be in the statistics. all the numbers have issues with them and thats kinda of the problem. we don't actually know how often cops kill people because we haven't taken the steps to get the info correct. and with out that information there not actually anything we can do concretely to fix the problem.


also the fact you seem to be pushing is that cops kill poor people not black people as if that's somehow better is kind of disturbing. your once again missing the point. the rate isn't so much the problem as it happens at all. note no one was surprised to here american cops killed somebody because it happens so often.
 
actually the CDC statistics have some holes in them as well which is actually part of the problem. it contingent on catching every single death certificate, for those death certificates to be accurate. also the CDC numbers only include deaths by gun meaning people like freddie gray here won't be in the statistics. all the numbers have issues with them and thats kinda of the problem. we don't actually know how often cops kill people because we haven't taken the steps to get the info correct. and with out that information there not actually anything we can do concretely to fix the problem.

Actually, no. While the CDC data isn't perfect, it is the best available an infinitely better than the FBI data. The CDC doesn't need to catch every single death certificate to be valid. It just has be representative PJ. I don't suppose you are familiar with the practice of polling? Obviously statistics isn't your forte. And the CDC database is certainly far more representative than FBI data you like.

And this is the definition used by the CDC (per the previously referenced Politicfact Article:

"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention keeps data on fatal injuries from 1999 to 2011 and one category is homicides by legal intervention. The term "legal intervention" covers any situation when a person dies at the hands of anyone authorized to use deadly force in the line of duty."


also the fact you seem to be pushing is that cops kill poor people not black people as if that's somehow better is kind of disturbing. your once again missing the point. the rate isn't so much the problem as it happens at all. note no one was surprised to here american cops killed somebody because it happens so often

Oh, and what leads you to that conclusion PJ? Where have I said it is better to kill poor people rather than black people? I am challenging you to support that assertion. Facts are facts, black are killed by law enforcement at a rate 3 times that of whites, but that doesn't mean the reason is because their skin was black. Blacks are also three times more likely to be involved in crime. Poor people are 3 times more likely to be involved in crime. In relative terms, more poor people are black. If you are black it is more likely you are poor. That's what the numbers say PJ. Just because the numbers are not consistent with your beliefs, it doesn't mean you should ignore them. Let me remind you, 3 of the 6 officers involved in Mr. Gray's case are black. The officer charged with Mr. Gray's murder is black.

Based on previously referenced material, the problem in our inner city appears to be more class related than race related. If we want to solve our inner city problems, instead of chasing our tails pursuing imaginary daemons, we need to focus on solving our very real problems and fighting our very real daemons, and the real daemon here is poverty. People (e.g. you) need to stop finger pointing and working to solve problems. It's really easy to point fingers and find blame. It's much more difficult to identify the problems, find solutions and implement them. And unless we fix our real problems, we are going to be jousting with windmills in perpetuity. Poverty is an old problem and it has yet to be solved.

That said, it doesn't mean some police departments need to change. Because they do, Mr. Gray's case clearly demonstrates that point. There is absolutely no justification why Mr. Gray should have lost his life after being arrested by Baltimore police. Now how Mr. Gray came to loose his life still remains a bit of a mystery. But regardless of how it happened, the Baltimore Police Department had a duty and obligation to protect his life and obviously they didn't. And there are police departments like Ferguson which were really out of touch with the community they policed. Unlike other developed nations, the US has a very fragmented police system and that make consistent police practices difficult and very vulnerable to local politics. That is a larger structural issue, but I don't see that changing anytime soon, if ever.

As for your assertion cop killings are so common, this nation has 320 million people in it. of that population, only a small infinitesimal portion are killed by police officers. The odds of anyone, black or white, being killed by a police officer are infinitesimally small. Just because you hear about it in the news once every few weeks, it doesn't make it the "cops gone wild" meme you are trying to paint. Cops killing people isn't common place - as much as you want it to be. This is a nation of over 320 million people.
 
Last edited:
the real daemon here is poverty...Poverty is an old problem and it has yet to be solved.

Seems to me that points to a larger problem/"daemon". Poverty is easily recognisable, so what gives? What about the countless law breakers among the middle class, the white collar criminals, or the murderous elite of the military industrial complex? What's their excuse? Their relative riches do not immunize them against committing acts of violence or crime. And why, for all their wealth--not to mention the wealth of politicians (left or right) who unnecessarily/selfishly spend exorbitant sums of money on themselves (continually adding as many perks as possible) while they 'serve' the public--do the poor even exist?

Does 'educating' the privileged humans do any good? What about educating the unfortunate? Who needs to learn what? What good will that do? Do you compel them to learn? Good luck.
 
... What about the countless law breakers among the middle class, the white collar criminals, or the murderous elite of the military industrial complex? ... And why, for all their wealth--not to mention the wealth of politicians (left or right) who unnecessarily/selfishly spend exorbitant sums of money on themselves (continually adding as many perks as possible) while they 'serve' the public--do the poor even exist?

Yes, but only in the abstract.
 
...we don't actually know how often cops kill people because we haven't taken the steps to get the info correct. and with out that information there
not actually anything we can do concretely to fix the problem. ...
There is one simple thing we could do with near zero cost that would help a lot, I think:
{part of post 16 here: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/wh...e-with-so-little-reason.145706/#post-3296494}. One thing that might help is if the dashboard camera recordings were public, not suppressible by the police as this one was for two years until legal action by ACLU against police department and Mayor forced its public release: http://news.yahoo.com/arrest-cop-kicking-black-man-signs-shift-prosecuting-174955849.html Video shows police office kicking face of a black man complying with order to get down as soon as man gets down to all fours (easy foot kick level), breaking his jaw and his hat flying > 6 feet up into air.
... Almost all police cars have dashboard cameras now, as do quite a few private cars whose owners want to be able to prove they were not at fault in accidents.
We need to "weed out" the really bad cops. They give the 99% a harder job working in the community. Police video records being public would help the 99% of good dedicated cops, who unfortunately, for very understandable reasons,* form a "solid blue line of silence" - worse than doctors do in mal-practice cases.

* Would you like other cops you work with (who could "accidently" shoot you) come to the conclusion you were "tattle telling" on other cops to the prosecutors, etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top