Lol!!!
So you bang on about me changing the meaning of words, and here you are blatantly ignoring a word for word translation.
Sorry, no idea what you're talking about.
But it was a fact.
So according to your logic, and comprehension of the meaning of the word “fact”, it IS true.
I’m only summarising what you spewed.
“Whether a fact is known or not, it's still a fact, hence is true.”
Sorry Jan, but Piltdown Man was not a fact, it was challenged by researches right from the very beginning and continued to be challenged until it was discovered to be a hoax.
I doubt anything sensible makes sense to you.
From you, anyways.
I can’t even put your dumbness down to atheism.
What am I dumb about Jan? Educate me.
Stop trying to weasel out of it.
You said in the previous post... “They look at definitions and unlike yourself, don't change them to suit their narratives.
Now back it up.
I dare you!
I've pointed them out each and every time you committed those frauds and you know it.