Bells said:
Hmmm... you don't like the thought of abortion but you'd kill the woman as she carries the child..
Well, that's pretty easy ...I don't consider it a child for a long, long time. I'm even leaning to the fact that it's not a child until it's birth!! So see, that ain't a hippo-critcal statement on my part.
Bells said:
So how would "society" police such a thing? Look at their taxable earnings before giving them the green light?....
Well, sure! But there are other ways that could be developed. As to how to keep "fucking" from making a baby, I'd suggest a birth-control implant into girls the minute they begin to produce eggs.
One thing that stands out in your post, Bells, is that, somehow, it seems that you feel that the right to fuck is so great and so important that ye're willing to subject all of those "accidental" children to a lifetime of abject poverty, disease, ill-health, hunger, poor housing, poor clothing and whatever else ....for all of their lives?!?! Surely you don't think that the "right to fuck" is that important, do you? ...to risk the lives of children? ..even one child?
Bells said:
Also, would you like everyone to be unfeeling little robots? Have no emotion or passion. How utterly boring Baron!
No, Bells, my ideas would make it quite the opposite!! With a birth-control implant, kids and adults could fuck their little brains out anytime, anywhere they wanted to. Then, when they want AND can show that they can support a child, then the implant would be "turned off".
I just can't see anyone agreeing that it's a "right" to bring a child into a life of abject poverty, disease, ill-health and poor housing. Does the child have no "rights" after it's born? (And just for Cotton, that also includes little black babies, too. Until they become, say, teenagers, all babies/kids are wonderful!)
Baron Max