I never said the scripture or religions do not have any positive aspects.
Sure.
Yes there is, if you are dealing with a religion where violent acts in the name of God are kinda "negotiable".
Given that we live in a world where violent acts are already "kinda negotiable", it seems you are just posturing to default religion to impotency. IOW in your books, its not about providing a legitimate critique, but about establishing a dominant ideology. Your so-called "Humanism" is window dressing.
Yes.
Lol
///
Yes, a Humanist ideology of "Thou shalt not kill", period. No pomp or circumstance, no sacrifices, just a simple "don't kill your fellow humans". It is not like it isn't practiced in nature. Ater all, many animals of the same species refrain from killing each other. Why should we act at a lower moral level than that?
Off the top of my head, the nature of God, the nature of the living entity, the nature of this phenomenal world and the natute of the relationship between these 3 things.
///
Rather than offering critique, which is immediately refuted exactly from the position of a higher authority you have been taking, such a fundamental tenet could apply to all races, creeds, and religions.
Its more the clause of "oh, and btw, you are all as equally unqualified as one another and bereft of any capacity to discriminate so the only ones worthy of yout equal and undivifed attention is us" ... that spoils the scene, or rather reveals that you are simply employing the same mofus operandi under a different name. IOW you are not seeing relative merit, only political identifications. As such, your intelligence can only bring further problems to an already problematic situation.
Nonsense.
The fact that I have pulled an understanding of those natures from his posts and you haven't probably indicates that you don't know your way around a laddhu.
You seem to be confusing religion and theism again. That is particularly relevant in some of the examples you list of Asian and African slaughters, where atheistic religions are common and large shares of the persecuted - making more obvious the lack of relevance of personal theistic belief in this slaughter business, unless a theistic religion is doing the killing.
Do you sign on to his bearing false witness, as in the OP and several of his replies here?
I understand what he saying and I can also understand why you can't understand what he is saying .... that said, I'm not sure I could attempt to explain it any better than what he is doing now.
I am not having any issue with that. I am having an issue with your drawing up of political affiliations before you bring assessments of merit (which is the standard approach of any intolerant fanatic group ... atheist, theist or otherwise).
