It proves there are documented incidents of atheists persecuting theists.
Scientists discover that atheists might not exist, and that’s not a joke
- Thread starter Jan Ardena
- Start date
- Status
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Well now that is a leap.
Picture one could have been a result of the theist commandment; "Thou shalt have no false Gods before me".
Picture two could be a result of theist worshippers killing the followers of those false Gods.
Don't you even dare to cast these aspersions on atheists, asshole!
Alternatively you can use the google image search function and get an education in (amongst other things) modern history.
Last edited:
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Research on the internet is all I do all day long. I am very well informed on modern history.
This is another example of your impertinence and disrespect for others who are cut from a different cloth.
If daddy dresses up as Santa, Santa exists, as per definition.
Denial and rejection in full effect folks.
How could the natural world bring itself into being?
Surprise! Surprise! NOT.
Your a frickin atheist.
What did you think there was a possibility that God could be wholly necessary, to explain the universe, and its functions?
Don't you get it yet?
Jan.
At least you wasn't silly enough to maintain the notion that the pigeon had an excessively credulous belief in and reverence for the supernatural.
Jan.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Only in the mind of a child. It is a subjective experience, until it is revealed that the bearded man in the red suit is daddy. At that point Santa is no longer real.
blah, blah...
Self organization and self assembly are scientifically proven methods. Did you not provide examples yourself?
And that proves I'm wrong? Hubris "Vanity" (a deadly sin)Surprise! Surprise! NOT.
Your a frickin atheist.
Yes I thought about it and have come to the conclusion that a God was not necessary.
Yes I do and I do not accept the "common" definition of God as a sentient and motivated being.
And in the absence of a different definition of God by you or any other theist, I'll stick with the common definition, and that is wholly unacceptable as a cosmic imperative.
God is a metaphor, not an equation.
Last edited:
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
blah, blah.
No. Santa is right in front of them.
Santa is Santa, because of what Santa wears, and his white beard. If a woman put on a Santa suit, it is still classed as Santa. If you see someone walking down the road., in the middle of July, wearing a Santa suit, you will recognise that as Santa. Get over it.
I provided examples of an intelligent agency, causing salt particles to take on various forms, due to the manipulation of sound vibration.
As an atheist you just saw particles self-organise. This is the reality of our respective positions.
No. It is the reason you have this world view.
As an atheist, you had no choice but to come to that, or a similar conclusion.
You'll notice that most atheist, when asked will express the self in a similar way, as long as they are defending their position.
What do you accept? Mathematics?
Sound like a denial and rejection of God. But the acceptance of something that needn't be identified as God.
You deny and reject God, which is why you claim there has been no definition of God, from myself.
Jan.
///If daddy dresses up as Santa, Santa exists, as per definition.
Denial and rejection in full effect folks.
How could the natural world bring itself into being?
Surprise! Surprise! NOT.
Your a frickin atheist.
What did you think there was a possibility that God could be wholly necessary, to explain the universe, and its functions?
Don't you get it yet?
Jan.
So if someone dresses up as god, that means god exists. If someone dresses up as Odin, Odin exists. If someone dresses up as Donald Duck, Donald Duck exists.
<>
The post in which that claim appears is typical of your posting. Here's the rest of that post:
Notice how accurately my description of your posting predicted your response to that very post:How so?
How far I push my sinning?
Isn't this religious language?
Isn't this what the article pertains to?
Find your own atheist expressions, don't borrow from the Christian world view.
If you can.
I do, but you don't listen. You are too busy defending your delusion. I use that term in the spirit of the article. But I am beginning to notice how deluded, explicit atheists (at least) are.
Atheists don't attack theists, do they.
Nooooooooo....!
No atheist has attacked me, in this thread. Have they?
Nooooooooo...!
So the question remains, and we can repeat it here: "- - - - are you misrepresenting your ideas, as well as other people's? Are you bearing false witness against yourself as well?"
They are representing the forms of both characters, as they are perceived to exist. And those representations, like Santa Claus actually exist.
Jan.
- Status