This is a misconception. There is no actual conversing, unlike a cell phone conversation. Data is sent by "it" but questions concerning the data sent are rarely answered.
Hold on a second, so what makes 'it' God? We all take in new data all the time, and many people perceive new data differently. It sounds to me like you have experienced something unknown more then once and went with God as the explanation. Fair enough as long as you can see other possibilities as well.
Our neural code working in our brains has been deciphered. Words, pictures, feeling, sensations and also pain are all available to be manipulated through the data being sent by “it”.
Again, what makes 'it' God. Words, pictures, feelings, sensations, pain, etc.. are all things that everyone experiences everyday!
And even if you have specific experiences that you have been sent 'data', who is to say what the source of the data you recieved is indeed from God?
Thinking technology will lend a better understanding of “it”. Origninating from a different demension or universe is mostly likely not the case.
Well that is your opinion, and it has no basis. I look for anything that is possible, I don't pretend to know - I already know none of us know everything. I'm always looking for new knowledge though, you give my nothing more then percpectives and opinions, we all have different ones of those!
"It" is certainly involved in prompting religious perceptions.
But religious percpectives are quite primative nowadays. Most logical people that do believe in religion have adapted their belief so it can fit with things now known. Most also know man wrote the books, not God.
Experience is the best teacher. Without experience one has no reference or association in gaining understanding. Examination of my experiences has given me some insight.
Experience is one of many teachers. However experiences change when situations are different. We all experience different things and we perceive those experiences differently. Life is experience, and everyone is different from the next. Experience is obviously important, but there are many ways to experience. Our individual perceptions of our experiences are true to us, but the way we percieve things is not neccessarily true at all!
I doubt there is going to be proof. You know, something passing the rigorous test of science.
If it is true there will be proof of it one day. You saying you doubt there will be proof, is telling me sub-consciensly you doubt it is true.
Well, at first "it" was pretending to be God, but when I confronted "it" with known inconsistencies then "it" changed its tactics.
Oh so you don't think 'it' is God, 'it' was just pretending. Now I am kinda confused, lmao.