You keep touting "Argument from Ignorance" but you haven't apparently taken notice of this portion;
My emphasis. Or are you claiming there is no evidence god merely because no-one has ever looked for evidence?
The argumentum ad ignorantiam [fallacy] is committed whenever it is argued that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proved false, or that it is false because it has not been proved true. He adds, A qualification should be made at this point. In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence despite searching, as positive evidence towards its non-occurrence. (Copi 1953)
My emphasis. Or are you claiming there is no evidence god merely because no-one has ever looked for evidence?