If you've never encountered a claim of belonging to an agricultural community or to a NES community, or even enough of them to rate it as common, it makes me wonder whether you are just making all this upAFAIK Hinduism is the only major religion that incorporates reincarnation in its theology, and those who take reincarnation seriously most definitely believe that everyone undergoes it. Even the lower animals, since if you're really an asshole you might come back as a rat, a cockroach or a flatworm.
Considering that up until the closing decades of the 19th century, 99% (or more) of humans were farmers, it is indeed amusing that very few of the people who claim to have memories of a past life remember being farmers. Depending on the era, a considerable number were also slaves, and I haven't heard of anyone remembering that experience either.
This in itself casts doubt on the veracity of the claims: they are statistically unbelievable.
Oh yeah, and people who speak English usually remember past lives in which they spoke English. The English-speaking community was a whole lot smaller before the colonial era, so it's hard to imagine how all those anglophones fit on Britannia.
If you don't also forget to include "extraordinary qualification" in the equation, then you would have a reasonable proposal
like a housewife finding out about personal things about a remote family in another country that they can't speak the language of during a period a few hundred years ago?
What biological mechanism does a dead person have?
Completely explained?
A partial explanation of abiogenesis is as credible as being partially alive or being partially pregnant.
its amusing that you cite the weakest claim in the field as the example to scrutinize
yet you dismiss this criteria when rallying behind the authority of abiogenesis?
If you are trying to suggest that you have thought about it greatly I think you are full of shit
Or alternatively, calling a person a name (like they are full of shit for example) is an accurate description of them (like if they offer a mere half paragraph as a conclusive investigation of a subject)Why thank you, they say that people who call others names are insecure with themselves, so you must have many problems.
I'm not reading your 3,400 posts to find out what you think to a similar question. I was hoping you or someone else could answer it directly. I've only been reading this place for a few weeks.
Get over yourself.
Why not compare them?
its not so much what you call them that I am concerned about - its more about your lack of investigation of the subject .... the whole half paragraph of itI only was generalizing when I made my statement, not at an individual but to ANYONE that thinks like that and thinks they are, you , on the other hand, singled me out to throw your insecurities at.
its not so much what you call them that I am concerned about - its more about your lack of investigation of the subject .... the whole half paragraph of it
