Jan Ardena:
It would be easier if, for once, you could explain what you mean instead of needing me to wheedle a coherent statement out of you.
This is a bit off topic, but I'm interested. You referred previously to the man who "compiled" the Vedas. Where did the original writings come from? At what point did God step in personally to do the writing?Man cannot write scripture.
You accept that Capracus is your God, then? Responding to statements out of the context they obviously have wastes your time and mine.I don’t reject Capracus.
Why? Because God isn't an "entity", or because God doesn't claim to be God?It’s a no-brainier. God isn’t an entity claiming to be God.
It would be easier if, for once, you could explain what you mean instead of needing me to wheedle a coherent statement out of you.
Read my previous post to Musika where I explained this. Once again, Jan, context is important. My posts to you appear the context of a thread discussing a topic. You'll understand my posts better if you read not only what I write to you, but also the other things I write on the same topic, not directly addressed to you.Why didn’t you accept Capracus as God?