@NM --
have you read the bible all the way through? (how do you know 'Nowhere does the bible even come close to saying'?) i notice you did not bring any verses to back up your opinion.
Yes, I have read the bible the whole way through, multiple times, using multiple translations. And the story I cited is so well known that I didn't think that verse and chapter were really necessary. Everyone in the US(and virtually everyone elsewhere as well) knows the story of Adam and Eve, why should the verse it happened in make any damn difference?
This is an example of you moving the goalposts.
and i already know you would not accept any alternate perspective regarding this, so why should i answer?
Not when the text explicitly disagrees with it no. If you can cite something from the bible that supports the whole omniscience thing then by all means do it, but you know as well as I do that there is no such verse in the bible.
@Knowledge --
Just because he "knows" the outcome doesn't mean it will happen.
Actually that's exactly what it means. If the outcome is already known then that, by definition, means that the outcome will proceed that way.
You are getting progressivly worse.
No, you're getting progressively less and less coherent. Your posts keep making less and less sense.
@Chiller --
I don't know why you insist the biblical or Abrahamic God isn't omniscient.
Because there's no reason to think that it is and because the abrahamic religions really like postulating free will.
@Ellie --
There is still free will though.
This isn't supported by any sort of evidence, in fact the latest discoveries from neurology indicate otherwise. We've discovered that movement decisions, such as whether or not to move your arm, are made about half a second
before you become aware of the decision. In fact by the time you become aware of any such decision the movement is already underway.
Man (humans) being made in his image should have free will, as long as they can get along.
Well, if man is made in the image of god(though I think that it's most likely the other way around) and god has free will then god isn't omniscient. QED.
Jesus showed us how to live with the Sermon on the Mount.
Showed us how to die.
Showed us what comes after.
This is what you believe, but it's far from a demonstrable fact. Sure, the Sermon on the Mount had some good shit in it, that much is true, but Jesus didn't just preach good shit, he came up with some downright evil ideas too. Such as the idea of eternal torture, which first showed up in the NT.
As for "what comes after", you first need to show that there
is an after to speak of. Until you do that this is nothing but deep fried bullshit and chips.
Just like man, woman and child is a
Trinity because without there is no life.
This just shows that you don't know anything about biology. Ever heard of parthenogenesis? Did you know that there are entire species which survive by parthenogenesis? Did you know that sexual intercourse didn't develop until very late in the evolutionary game?
In fact, to say what you did involves either deliberately ignoring all of this or being ignorant of all of this. Either way...