Still wrong.Jus pointing out to you that theories can be proven to be factual or just WRONG.
Theories cannot be proven to be factual, they simply gather more supporting evidence.
You are STILL misconstruing what a theory is.
Still wrong.Jus pointing out to you that theories can be proven to be factual or just WRONG.
Still wrong.
Theories cannot be proven to be factual, they simply gather more supporting evidence.
You are STILL misconstruing what a theory is.
I am only concerned with facts.
Is that why you have a predilection for inventing your own?I am only concerned with facts.
Theories cannot be proven to be factual.
Question:
If God knows the decision of every individual, before they are born, regarding the acceptance or denial of Jesus as a savior, then why does he create one set of individuals destined for heaven and another set destined for eternal damnation? This seems unjust, perverse and particularly evil.
Conclusions:
If God is omniscient then humans do not have free will (see argument above) and the apparent arbitrary choice of God to condemn many individuals to eternal damnation is evil. I.e. God does not possess the property of omni benevolence and is therefore not worth our attention.
If humans have true free will then God cannot be omniscient (see argument above). If he is not omniscient then he also cannot be omnipotent since knowledge of the future is a prerequisite for total action. Without these abilities God can no longer be deemed a god – i.e. God does not exist.
If humans do not have free will then the choice of whether to choose Jesus as a savior or not makes total nonsense of Christianity since the choice is pre-determined and we are merely puppets at the hands of an evil monster.
Cris
Still wrong.Perhaps one way to look at it. So you are saying that proving something factual and it is no longer a theory.
The explanation cannot, ever, be proven to be factual it can only gain more supporting evidence (more facts that agree with the theory).
Wow you really do have a talent for missing the point don't you.Now you are nickel and dimeing.
"Now I'm nickel and dimeing (sic)"?
What is the sic for?
It means there is a spelling error.
Ever heard of Google?What is the sic for?
It may also be used to highlight a perceived error, sometimes for the purpose of ridicule
Thank you, i know what the purpose is but where is the spelling error?
Thank you, i know what the purpose is but where is the spelling error?
how about dieing?